Goodson, A. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2024

Protein identification using cryo-EM and artificial intelligence guides improved sample purification

Protein purification is essential in protein biochemistry, structural biology, and protein design. It enables the determination of protein structures, the study of biological mechanisms, and the biochemical and biophysical characterization of both natural and de novo designed proteins. Despite the broad application of various protein purification protocols, standard strategies can still encounter challenges, such as the unintended co-purification of unknown contaminants alongside the target protein. In particular, co-purification issues pose significant challenges for designed self-assembling protein nanomaterials, as it is difficult to determine whether unexpected observed geometries represent novel assembly states of the designed system, cross-contamination from other assemblies, or native proteins originating from the expression host. In this study, we assessed the ability of an automated structure-to-sequence pipeline to unambiguously identify an unknown co-purifying protein found across several purified designed protein samples. Using cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM), ModelAngelos sequence-agnostic automated model-building feature, and the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST), we identified the unknown protein as dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase (DLST). This identification was further confirmed by comparing the cryo-EM data with available DLST structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and AlphaFold 3 predictions from the top BLAST hits. The clear identification of DLST informed our subsequent literature search and led to the rational modification of our protein purification protocol, ultimately enabling the exclusion of the contaminant from preparations of our target nanoparticle. This study demonstrates the successful application of a structure-to-sequence workflow, integrating Cryo-EM, ModelAngelo, protein BLAST, PDB structures, and AlphaFold 3 predictions, to identify and remove an unknown protein from a purified sample. It also highlights the broader potential of integrating Cryo-EM with AI-driven tools for accurate protein identification across various samples and contexts within protein science. HighlightsO_LIAn unknown protein was consistently found in multiple de novo designed protein samples. C_LIO_LIThe protein was identified as dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase (DLST) using Cryo-EM, ModelAngelo and BLAST, and further verified using AlphaFold 3 and the PDB. C_LIO_LIIdentification enabled rational modification of the purification protocol to exclude the contaminant. C_LIO_LIThis method enables accurate protein identification without requiring near-atomic resolution or prior sequence and structural data, making it broadly applicable to various areas of protein science. C_LI Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=147 SRC="FIGDIR/small/612515v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (65K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@592410org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4ea3f3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@edd0bcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@122fba2_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2023

Rapid and automated design of two-component protein nanomaterials using ProteinMPNN

The design of novel protein-protein interfaces using physics-based design methods such as Rosetta requires substantial computational resources and manual refinement by expert structural biologists. A new generation of deep learning methods promises to simplify protein-protein interface design and enable its application to a wide variety of problems by researchers from various scientific disciplines. Here we test the ability of a deep learning method for protein sequence design, ProteinMPNN, to design two-component tetrahedral protein nanomaterials and benchmark its performance against Rosetta. ProteinMPNN had a similar success rate to Rosetta, yielding 13 new experimentally confirmed assemblies, but required orders of magnitude less computation and no manual refinement. The interfaces designed by ProteinMPNN were substantially more polar than those designed by Rosetta, which facilitated in vitro assembly of the designed nanomaterials from independently purified components. Crystal structures of several of the assemblies confirmed the accuracy of the design method at high resolution. Our results showcase the potential of deep learning-based methods to unlock the widespread application of designed protein-protein interfaces and self-assembling protein nanomaterials in biotechnology.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2021

Neural correlates and determinants of approach-avoidance conflict in the prelimbic prefrontal cortex

The recollection of environmental cues associated with threat or reward allows animals to select the most appropriate behavioral responses. Neurons in the prelimbic cortex (PL) respond to both threat- and reward-associated cues. However, it remains unknown whether PL regulates threat-avoidance vs. reward-approaching responses when an animals decision depends on previously associated memories. Using a conflict model in which male Long-Evans rats retrieve memories of shock- and food-paired cues, we observed two distinct phenotypes during conflict: i) rats that continued to press a lever for food (Pressers); and ii) rats that exhibited a complete suppression in food seeking (Non-Pressers). Single-unit recordings revealed that increased risk-taking behavior in Pressers is associated with persistent food-cue responses in PL, and reduced spontaneous activity in PL glutamatergic (PLGLUT) neurons during conflict. Activating PLGLUT neurons in Pressers attenuated food-seeking responses in a neutral context, whereas inhibiting PLGLUT neurons in Non-Pressers reduced defensive responses and increased food approaching during conflict. Our results establish a causal role for PLGLUT neurons in mediating individual variability in memory-based risky decision making by regulating threat-avoidance vs. reward-approach behaviors.

neuroscience↗