Biology subjects

Gomi, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Gomi, H..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2021

Neural dynamics of illusory tactile pulling sensations

The sensation of directional forces and their associated sensorimotor commands are inextricably intertwined, complicating the identification of brain circuits responsible for tactile pulling sensations. One hypothesis is that, like tactile frequency discrimination, pulling sensations are generated by early sensory-frontal activity. Alternatively, they may be generated later in the somatosensory association cortex. To dissociate these accounts and uncouple the pulling sensation from unrelated but correlated sensory and motor processing, we combined high-density EEG with an oddball paradigm and asymmetric vibration, which creates an illusory sensation of the hand being directionally pulled. Oddballs that created a pulling sensation in the opposite direction to common stimuli were compared to the same oddballs in the context of neutral common stimuli (symmetric vibration) and to neutral oddballs. Brain responses to having directional pulling expectations violated by directional stimuli were therefore isolated. Contrary to the sensory-frontal account, frontal N140 brain activity was actually larger for neutral than pulling oddballs. Instead, pulling sensations were associated with amplitude and latency modulations of midline P200 and P3b potentials, and specifically, to contralateral parietal lobe activity 280ms post-stimulus. The timing of this activity suggested pulling sensations involve spatial processing, such as tactile remapping between coordinate frames. Source localization showed this activity to be centered on the postcentral sulcus, superior parietal lobule and intraparietal sulcus, suggesting that pulling sensations arise via the processing of body position, tactile orientation and peripersonal space. Our results demonstrate how tactile illusions can uniquely disambiguate parietal contributions to somatosensation by removing unrelated sensory processing. Significance statementThe neural mechanisms of tactile pulling sensations are poorly understood. Competing early sensory-frontal and later somatosensory association cortex accounts are hard to dissociate due to confounding sensory and motor signals present when forces are applied to the skin. Here, we used EEG and a novel asymmetric vibration approach to induce an illusory pulling sensation, which circumvents these issues. We found that pulling sensations were associated with parietal lobe activity 280ms post-stimulus and modulations of the P200. The timing and location of this activity suggested that pulling sensations necessitate spatial processing and supported a somatosensory association cortex account of the pulling sensation.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Intermanual transfer of visuomotor learning is facilitated by a cognitive strategy

Humans continuously adapt their movement to a novel environment by recalibrating their sensorimotor system. Recent evidence, however, shows that explicit planning to compensate for external changes, i.e. a cognitive strategy, can also aid performance. If such a strategy is indeed planned in external space, it should improve performance in an effector independent manner. We tested this hypothesis by examining whether promoting a cognitive strategy during a visual-force adaptation task performed in one hand can facilitate learning for the opposite hand. Participants rapidly adjusted the height of visual bar on screen to a target level by isometrically exerting force on a handle using their right hand. Visuomotor gain increased during the task and participants learned the increased gain. Visual feedback was continuously provided for one group, while for another group only the endpoint of the force trajectory was presented. The latter has been reported to promote cognitive strategy use. We found that endpoint feedback produced stronger intermanual transfer of learning and slower response times than continuous feedback. In a separate experiment, we confirmed that the aftereffect is indeed reduced when only endpoint feedback is provided, a finding that has been consistently observed when cognitive strategies are used. The results suggest that intermanual transfer can be facilitated by a cognitive strategy. This indicates that the behavioral observation of intermanual transfer can be achieved either by forming an effector-independent motor representation, or by sharing an effector-independent cognitive strategy between the hands. New and noteworthyThe causes and consequences of cognitive strategy use for motor learning are poorly understood. We tested whether a visuomotor task learned using a strategy generalizes across effectors. Visual feedback was manipulated to enhance the use of a cognitive strategy. Learning using a cognitive strategy for one hand transferred to the task performed by the un-learned hand. Our result suggests that intermanual transfer can also result from a common cognitive strategy used to control both hands.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Sensory and cognitive factors affecting multi-digit touch: a perceptual and modeling study

Whilst everyday interactions with objects often involve multiple tactile contacts, integration of tactile signals remains poorly understood. Here we characterise the integration process of tactile motion on multiple fingerpads. Across four experiments, participants averaged the direction of two simultaneous tactile motion trajectories delivered to different fingerpads. Averaging performance differed between within- and between-hands in terms of sensitivity and precision but was unaffected by somatotopic proximity between stimulated fingers. The sensitivity to the average direction was influenced by the discrepancy between individual motion signals, but only for within-hand conditions. This was explained by a model, in which the virtually leading finger received a higher perceptual weighting. Precision was greater in between-hand compared to within-hand conditions. While biased weighting accounted for differences in sensitivity, it was not sufficient to explain the difference in precision, implying additional sensory limitations during within-hand integration. We suggest that unimanual integration is limited and thus exploits a natural cognitive prior involving a single object moving relative to the hand to maximise information gain. Author summaryTactile stimulation is always on. Yet little is known about how the brain combines widespread tactile inputs for perception. Most tactile studies emphasize a single point of tactile stimulation (e.g., location or intensity of a static stimulus) and minimal units of tactile perception (e.g., acuity or selectivity). However, our daily interactions with the world involve encoding spatially and temporally extended tactile signals. Perceiving tactile objects and events as coherent entities requires the somatosensory system to aggregate tactile afferent signals across separate skin regions (i.e., separate digits). Across four experiments we asked participants to average direction of two tactile motion trajectories delivered simultaneously to two different fingerpads, either on the same, or on different hands. Our results show strong integration between multiple tactile inputs, but subject to limitations for inputs delivered within a hand. Our model suggests that tactile inputs are weighted according to an integrative model of hand-object interaction that operates within-hands on purely geometric information to prioritise novel information from a virtually leading finger (VLF).

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Constructing spatial perception through self-touch

Classical accounts of spatial perception are based either on the topological layout of sensory receptors, or on implicit spatial information provided by motor commands. In everyday self-touch, as when stroking the left arm with the right hand, these elements are inextricably linked, meaning that tactile and motor contributions to spatial perception cannot readily be disentangled. Here, we developed a robot-mediated form of self-touch in order to decouple the spatial extent of active or passive movements from their tactile consequences. Participants judged the spatial extent of either the movement of the right hand, or of the resulting tactile stimulation to their left forearm. Across five experiments, we found bidirectional interference between motor and tactile information. Crucially, both directions of interference were stronger during active than passive movements. Thus, voluntary motor commands produced stronger integration of multiple signals relevant to spatial perception.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Somatosensory evoked potentials indexing lateral inhibition are modulated according to the mode of perceptual processing: comparing or combining multi-digit tactile motion

Many perceptual studies focus on the brains capacity to discriminate between stimuli. However, our normal experience of the world also involves integrating multiple stimuli into a single perceptual event. Neural circuit mechanisms such as lateral inhibition are believed to enhance local differences between sensory inputs from nearby regions of the receptor surface. However, this mechanism would seem dysfunctional when sensory inputs need to be combined rather than contrasted. Here, we investigated whether the brain can strategically regulate the strength of suppressive interactions that underlie lateral inhibition between finger representations in human somatosensory processing. To do this, we compared sensory processing between conditions that required either comparing or combining information. We delivered two simultaneous tactile motion trajectories to index and middle fingertips of the right hand. Participants had to either compare the directions of the two stimuli, or to combine them to form their average direction. To reveal preparatory tuning of somatosensory cortex, we used an established event-related potential design to measure the interaction between cortical representations evoked by digital nerve shocks immediately before each tactile stimulus. Consistent with previous studies, we found a clear suppressive interaction between cortical activations when participants were instructed to compare the tactile motion directions. Importantly, this suppressive interaction was significantly reduced when participants had to combine the same stimuli. These findings suggest that the brain can strategically switch between a comparative and a combinative mode of somatosensory processing, according to the perceptual goal, by preparatorily adjusting the strength of a process akin to lateral inhibition.

neuroscience↗