Biology subjects

Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L..

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

bioRxiv2019

Gene regulatory architectures dissect the evolutionary dynamics of regulatory elements in humans and non-human primates

To gain insight into the evolution of the epigenetic regulation of gene expression in primates, we extensively profiled a new panel of human, chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, and macaque lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), using ChIP-seq for five histone marks, ATAC-seq and RNA-seq, further complemented with WGS and WGBS. We annotated regulatory elements and integrated chromatin contact maps to define gene regulatory architectures, creating the largest catalog of regulatory elements in primates to date. We report that epigenetic conservation and its correlation with sequence conservation in primates depends on the activity state of the regulatory element. Our gene regulatory architectures reveal the coordination of different types of components and highlight the role of promoters and intragenic enhancers in the regulation of gene expression. We observed that most regulatory changes occur in weakly active intragenic enhancers. Remarkably, novel human-specific intragenic enhancers with weak activities are enriched in human-specific mutations. These elements appear in genes with signals of positive selection, tissue-specific expression and particular functional enrichments, suggesting that the regulatory evolution of these genes may have contributed to human adaptation.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Ancient genomic regulatory blocks are a major source for gene deserts in vertebrates after whole genome duplications

We investigated how the two rounds of whole genome duplication that occurred at the base of the vertebrate lineage have impacted ancient microsyntenic associations involving developmental regulators (known as genomic regulatory blocks, GRBs). We showed that the majority of GRBs present in the last common ancestor of chordates have been maintained as a single copy in humans. We found evidence that dismantling of the additional GRB copies occurred early in vertebrate evolution often through the differential retention of the regulatory gene but loss of the bystander genes exonic sequences. Despite the large evolutionary scale, the presence of duplicated highly conserved non-coding regions provided unambiguous proof for this scenario for dozens of ancient GRBs. Remarkably, the dismantling of ancient GRB duplicates has contributed to the creation of large gene deserts associated with regulatory genes in vertebrates, providing a widespread mechanism for the origin of these enigmatic genomic traits.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2019

The epigenomic landscape regulating organogenesis in human embryos linked to developmental disorders

How the genome activates or silences transcriptional programmes governs organ formation. Little is known in human embryos undermining our ability to benchmark the fidelity of in vitro stem cell differentiation or cell programming, or interpret the pathogenicity of noncoding variation. Here, we studied histone modifications across thirteen tissues during human organogenesis. We integrated the data with transcription to build the first overview of how the human genome differentially regulates alternative organ fates including by repression. Promoters from nearly 20,000 genes partitioned into discrete states without showing bivalency. Key developmental gene sets were actively repressed outside of the appropriate organ. Candidate enhancers, functional in zebrafish, allowed imputation of tissue-specific and shared patterns of transcription factor binding. Overlaying more than 700 noncoding mutations from patients with developmental disorders allowed correlation to unanticipated target genes. Taken together, the data provide a new, comprehensive genomic framework for investigating normal and abnormal human development.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

Pluripotency factors regulate the onset of Hox cluster activation in the early embryo

Pluripotent cells are a transient population present in the early mammalian embryo dependent on transcription factors, such as OCT4 and NANOG, which maintain pluripotency while simultaneously suppressing lineage specification. Interestingly, these factors are not exclusive to uncommitted cells, but are also expressed during early phases of differentiation. However, their role in the transition from pluripotency to lineage specification is largely unknown. Using genetic models for controlled Oct4 or Nanog expression during postimplantation stages, we found that pluripotency factors play a dual role in regulating key lineage specifiers, initially repressing their expression and later being required for their proper activation. We show that the HoxB cluster is coordinately regulated in this way by OCT4 binding sites located at the 3 end of the cluster. Our results show that core pluripotency factors are not limited to maintaining the pre-committed epiblast, but are also necessary for the proper deployment of subsequent developmental programs.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Evolution of the embryonic cis-regulatory landscapes between divergent Phallusia and Ciona ascidians.

Ascidian species of the Phallusia and Ciona genera are distantly related, their last common ancestor dating several hundred million years ago. Although their genome sequences have extensively diverged since this radiation, Phallusia and Ciona species share almost identical early morphogenesis and stereotyped cell lineages.\n\nHere, we explored the evolution of transcriptional control between P. mammillata and C. robusta. We combined genome-wide mapping of open chromatin regions in both species with a comparative analysis of the regulatory sequences of a test set of 10 pairs of orthologous early regulatory genes with conserved expression patterns.\n\nWe find that ascidian chromatin accessibility landscapes obey similar rules as in other metazoa. Open-chromatin regions are short, highly conserved within each genus and cluster around regulatory genes. In most cases, chromatin accessibility is not temporally regulated during early embryogenesis. Open-chromatin regions are highly enriched in cis-regulatory elements: 73% of 49 open chromatin regions around our test genes behaved as either distal enhancers or proximal enhancer/promoters following electroporation in Phallusia eggs. Analysis of this datasets suggests a pervasive use in ascidians of \"shadow\" enhancers with partially overlapping activities. Cross-species electroporations point to a deep conservation of the trans-regulatory logic between these distantly-related ascidians and. Finally, we found that the relative order and approximate distance to the transcription start site of open chromatin regions can be conserved between Ciona and Phallusia species despite extensive sequence divergence, a property that can be used to identify orthologous enhancers, whose regulatory activity can partially diverge.\n\nHIGHLIGHTSO_LIOpen chromatin regions are highly enriched for cis-regulatory elements in ascidian early embryos.\nC_LIO_LIAscidian Clusters of Open Regulatory Elements (COREs) are found next to regulatory genes.\nC_LIO_LIRegulatory gene expression, the trans-regulatory code, is conserved between distantly-related Ciona and Phallusia ascidians.\nC_LIO_LIAscidians show pervasive use of \"shadow\" enhancers\nC_LIO_LIThe position of homologous enhancers can be conserved, despite extensive genome divergence.\nC_LI

genomics↗

bioRxiv2017

Gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts influences the genetic basis of morphological evolution

Convergent phenotypic evolution is often caused by recurrent changes at particular nodes in the underlying gene regulatory networks (GRNs). The genes at such evolutionary hotspots are thought to maximally affect the phenotype with minimal pleiotropic consequences. This has led to the suggestion that if a GRN is understood in sufficient detail, the path of evolution may be predictable. The repeated evolutionary loss of larval trichomes among Drosophila species is caused by the loss of shavenbaby (svb) expression. svb is also required for development of leg trichomes, but the evolutionary gain of trichomes in the naked valley on T2 femurs in Drosophila melanogaster is caused by the loss of microRNA-92a (miR-92a) expression rather than changes in svb. We compared the expression and function of components between the larval and leg trichome GRNs to investigate why the genetic basis of trichome pattern evolution differs in these developmental contexts. We found key differences between the two networks in both the genes employed, and in the regulation and function of common genes. These differences in the GRNs reveal why mutations in svb are unlikely to contribute to leg trichome evolution and how instead miR-92a represents the key evolutionary switch in this context. Our work shows that variability in GRNs across different developmental contexts, as well as whether a morphological feature is lost versus gained, influence the nodes at which a GRN evolves to cause morphological change. Therefore, our findings have important implications for understanding the pathways and predictability of evolution.\n\nAuthor SummaryA major goal of biology is to identify the genetic cause of organismal diversity. Convergent evolution of traits is often caused by changes in the same genes - evolutionary hotspots. shavenbaby is a hotspot for larval trichome loss in Drosophila, however microRNA-92a underlies the gain of leg trichomes. To understand this difference in the genetics of phenotypic evolution, we compared the expression and function of genes in the underlying regulatory networks. We found that the pathway of evolution is influenced by differences in gene regulatory network architecture in different developmental contexts, as well as by whether a trait is lost or gained. Therefore, hotspots in one context may not readily evolve in a different context. This has important implications for understanding the genetic basis of phenotypic change and the predictability of evolution.

evolutionary biology↗