bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Godfrey, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Godfrey, P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Massively parallel reporter assays and mouse transgenic assays provide complementary information about neuronal enhancer activity

Genetic studies find hundreds of thousands of noncoding variants associated with psychiatric disorders. Massively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) and in vivo transgenic mouse assays can be used to assay the impact of these variants. However, the relevance of MPRAs to in vivo function is unknown and transgenic assays suffer from low throughput. Here, we studied the utility of combining the two assays to study the impact of non-coding variants. We carried out an MPRA on over 50,000 sequences derived from enhancers validated in transgenic mouse assays and from multiple fetal neuronal ATAC-seq datasets. We also tested over 20,000 variants, including synthetic mutations in highly active neuronal enhancers and 177 common variants associated with psychiatric disorders. Variants with a high impact on MPRA activity were further tested in mice. We found a strong and specific correlation between MPRA and mouse neuronal enhancer activity including changes in neuronal enhancer activity in mouse embryos for variants with strong MPRA effects. Mouse assays also revealed pleiotropic variant effects that could not be observed in MPRA. Our work provides a large catalog of functional neuronal enhancers and variant effects and highlights the effectiveness of combining MPRAs and mouse transgenic assays.

genomics↗

Uncovering Hidden Enhancers Through Unbiased In Vivo Testing

Transcriptional enhancers are a predominant class of noncoding regulatory elements that activate cell type-specific gene expression. Tissue-specific enhancer-associated chromatin signatures have proven useful to identify candidate enhancer elements at a genome-wide scale, but their sensitivity for the comprehensive detection of all enhancers active in a given tissue in vivo remains unclear. Here we show that a substantial proportion of in vivo enhancers are hidden from discovery by conventional chromatin profiling methods. In an initial comparison of over 1,200 in vivo validated tissue-specific enhancers with tissue-matched mouse developmental epigenome data, 14% (n=286) of active enhancers did not show canonical enhancer-associated chromatin signatures in the tissue in which they are active. To assess the prevalence of enhancers not detectable by conventional chromatin profiling approaches in more detail, we used a high throughput transgenic enhancer reporter assay to systematically screen over 1.3 Mb of mouse genomic sequence at two critical developmental loci, assessing a total of 281 consecutive 5kb regions for in vivo enhancer activity in mouse embryos. We observed reproducible enhancer-reporter activity in 88 tissue-specific elements, 26% of which did not show canonical enhancer-associated chromatin signatures in the corresponding tissues. Overall, we find these hidden enhancers are indistinguishable from marked enhancers based on levels of evolutionary conservation, enrichment of transcription factor families, and genomic positioning relative to putative target genes. In combination, our retrospective and prospective studies assessed only 0.1% of the mouse genome and identified 309 tissue-specific enhancers that are hidden from current chromatin-based enhancer identification approaches. Our findings suggest the existence of tens of thousands of active enhancers throughout the genome that remain undetected by current chromatin profiling approaches and are an unappreciated source of additional genome function of import in interpreting growing whole human genome sequencing data.

genomics↗