bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Goddard, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Goddard, E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A humanness dimension to visual object coding in the brain

Neuroimaging studies investigating human object recognition have largely focused on a relatively small number of object categories, in particular, faces, bodies, scenes, and vehicles. More recent studies have taken a broader focus, investigating hypothesised dichotomies, for example animate versus inanimate, and continuous feature dimensions, such as biologically similarity. These studies typically have used stimuli that are clearly identified as animate or inanimate, neglecting objects that may not fit into this dichotomy. We generated a novel stimulus set including standard objects and objects that blur the animate-inanimate dichotomy, for example robots and toy animals. We used MEG time-series decoding to study the brains emerging representation of these objects. Our analysis examined contemporary models of object coding such as dichotomous animacy, as well as several new higher order models that take into account an objects capacity for agency (i.e. its ability to move voluntarily) and capacity to experience the world. We show that early brain responses are best accounted for by low-level visual similarity of the objects; and shortly thereafter, higher order models of agency/experience best explained the brains representation of the stimuli. Strikingly, a model of human-similarity provided the best account for the brains representation after an initial perceptual processing phase. Our findings provide evidence for a new dimension of object coding in the human brain - one that has a \"human-centric\" focus.

neuroscience

Spatial and feature-selective attention have distinct effects on population-level tuning.

Attention is a fundamental brain process by which we selectively prioritize relevant information in our environment. Cognitively, we can employ different methods for selecting visual information for further processing, but the extent to which these are implemented by similar or different neural processes remains unclear. Spatial and feature-selective attention both change the stimulus related information signaled by single-cells and neural populations, but relatively few studies have directly compared the effects of these distinct types of attention. We scanned participants (n=20) using MEG, while they covertly attended to an object on the left or the right of fixation (spatial attention manipulation) and reported the objects shape or color (feature-selective attention manipulation). We used multivariate pattern classification to measure population stimulus-coding in occipital and frontal areas, for attended and non-attended stimulus features, at attended and non-attended locations. In occipital cortex, we show that both spatial and feature-selective attention enhanced object representations, and the effects of these two attention types interacted multiplicatively. We also found that spatial and feature-selective attention induced qualitatively different patterns of enhancement in occipital cortex for the encoding of stimulus color. Specifically, feature-based attention primarily enhanced small color differences, while spatial attention produced greater enhancement for larger differences. We demonstrate that principles of response-gain and tuning curve sharpening that have been applied to describe the effects of attention at the level of a single neuron can account for these differences. An information flow analysis suggested that these attentional effects may be driven by feedback from frontal areas.

neuroscience