Gnanabharathi, B. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2025

Synaptic vesicles that store monoamines and glutamate differ in protein composition.

Neuromodulators such as the monoamines are known to differ from classical neurotransmitters like glutamate in the time scale of signaling due to activation of slower G protein-coupled receptors. Recent work has suggested that the mode of release also differs between classical and modulatory transmitters. Although many components of neurotransmitter release machinery have been identified, we still understand little about the mechanisms responsible for differences in release. In this study, we address the differences between release of dopamine and glutamate by comparing the composition of synaptic vesicles (SVs) that contain the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) versus vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (VGLUT2). Previous work has shown that these SV populations differ in frequency dependence, recycling kinetics and biogenesis. Taking advantage of a CRISPR-generated knock-in mouse with a cytoplasmic hemagglutinin (HA) tag at the N-terminus of VMAT2 to immunoisolate monoamine SVs, we find differences in the abundance and isoform expression of many SV protein families. Validation in primary neurons and in brain tissue confirms these differences in SV protein abundance between dopamine and glutamate release sites. Functional analysis reveals that the loss of differentially expressed SCAMP5 selectively impairs the recycling of VGLUT2 SVs, sparing VMAT2 vesicles in the same neuronal population. These findings provide new insights into the molecular diversity of SVs and the mechanisms that regulate the release of dopamine and glutamate, with implications for the physiological role of these transmitters and behavior.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Biphasic Internetwork Coordination is Funneled through an Electrical Synapse

Linked rhythmic behaviors, such as respiration/locomotion or swallowing/chewing often require coordination for proper function. Despite its prevalence, the cellular mechanisms controlling coordination of the underlying neural networks remain undetermined in most systems. We use the stomatogastric nervous system of the crab Cancer borealis to investigate mechanisms of inter-network coordination, due to its small, well characterized feeding-related networks (gastric mill [chewing, [~]0.1 Hz]; pyloric [filtering food, [~]1 Hz]). Here, we investigate coordination between these networks during the Gly1-SIFamide neuropeptide modulatory state. Gly1-SIFamide activates a unique triphasic gastric mill rhythm in which the typically pyloric-only LPG neuron generates dual pyloric- plus gastric mill-timed oscillations. Additionally, the pyloric rhythm exhibits shorter cycles during gastric mill rhythm-timed LPG bursts, and longer cycles during IC, or IC plus LG gastric mill neuron bursts. Photoinactivation revealed that LPG is necessary to shorten pyloric cycle period, likely through its rectified electrical coupling to pyloric pacemaker neurons. Hyperpolarizing current injections demonstrated that although LG bursting enables IC bursts, only gastric mill rhythm bursts in IC are necessary to prolong the pyloric cycle period. Surprisingly, LPG photoinactivation also eliminated prolonged pyloric cycles, without changing IC firing frequency or gastric mill burst duration, suggesting that pyloric cycles are prolonged via IC synaptic inhibition of LPG, which indirectly slows the pyloric pacemakers via electrical coupling. Thus, the same dual-network neuron directly conveys excitation from its endogenous bursting and indirectly funnels synaptic inhibition to enable one network to alternately decrease and increase the cycle period of a related network. Significance StatementRelated rhythmic behaviors frequently exhibit coordination, yet the cellular mechanisms coordinating the underlying neural networks are not determined in most systems. We investigated coordination between two small, well-characterized crustacean feeding-associated networks during a neuropeptide-elicited modulatory state. We find that a dual fast/slow network neuron directly shortens fast network cycles during its slow, intrinsically generated bursts, likely via electrical coupling to fast network pacemakers, despite rectification favoring the opposite direction. Additionally, the fast network is indirectly prolonged during another slow-network phase, via chemical synaptic inhibition that is likely funneled through the same electrical synapse. Thus, a dual-network neuron alternately reinforces and diminishes neuropeptide actions, enabling distinct frequencies of a faster network across different phases of a related slower rhythm.

neuroscience↗