Biology subjects

Glausier, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Glausier, J..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2021

Molecular rhythm alterations in prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens associated with opioid use disorder

Severe and persistent disruptions to sleep and circadian rhythms are common features of people with opioid use disorder (OUD). Preclinical findings suggest altered molecular rhythms in the brain are involved in opioid reward and dependence. However, whether molecular rhythms are disrupted in brains of people with OUD remained an open question, critical to understanding the role of circadian rhythms in opioid addiction. We previously used subjects times of death (TOD) as a marker of time of day to investigate transcriptional rhythm alterations in psychiatric disorders. Using TOD and RNA sequencing, we discovered rhythmic transcripts in both the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and nucleus accumbens (NAc), key brain areas involved in opioid addiction, were largely distinct between OUD and unaffected comparison subjects. Further, fewer rhythmic transcripts were identified in DLPFC of OUD subjects compared to unaffected subjects, but nearly double the number of rhythmic transcripts were found in the NAc of OUD subjects. In OUD, rhythmic transcripts in the NAc peaked either in the evening or near sunrise, and were associated with dopamine, opioid, and GABAergic neurotransmission. Co-expression network analysis identified several OUD-specific modules in the NAc, enriched for transcripts involved in the modulation of dopamine and GABA synapses, including glutamatergic signaling and extracellular matrices. Integrative analyses with human GWAS revealed that rhythmic transcripts in DLPFC and NAc were enriched for genomic loci associated with sleep duration and insomnia. Overall, our results connect transcriptional rhythm changes in dopamine, opioid, and GABAergic synaptic signaling in human brain to sleep-related phenotypes and OUD.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Transcriptional alterations in opioid use disorder reveal an interplay between neuroinflammation and synaptic remodeling

BackgroundPrevalence rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) have increased dramatically, accompanied by a surge of overdose deaths. While opioid dependence has been extensively studied in preclinical models, an understanding of the biological alterations that occur in the brains of people who chronically use opioids and who are diagnosed with OUD remains limited. To address this limitation, RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) was conducted on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and nucleus accumbens (NAc), regions heavily implicated in OUD, from postmortem brains in subjects with OUD. MethodsWe performed RNA-seq on the DLPFC and NAc from unaffected comparison subjects (n=20) and subjects diagnosed with OUD (n=20). Our transcriptomic analyses identified differentially expressed (DE) transcripts and investigated the transcriptional coherence between brain regions using rank-rank hypergeometric ordering (RRHO). Weighted gene co-expression analyses (WGCNA) also identified OUD-specific modules and gene networks. Integrative analyses between DE transcripts and GWAS datasets using linkage disequilibrium score (LDSC) assessed the genetic liability psychiatric-related phenotypes. ResultsRRHO analyses revealed extensive overlap in transcripts between DLPFC and NAc in OUD, primarily relating to synaptic remodeling and neuroinflammation. Identified transcripts were enriched for factors that control pro-inflammatory cytokine-mediated, chondroitin sulfate, and extracellular matrix signaling. Cell-type deconvolution implicated a role for microglia as a critical driver for opioid-induced neuroplasticity. Using LDSC, we discovered genetic liabilities for risky behavior, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and depression. ConclusionsOverall, our findings reveal new connections between the brains immune system and opioid dependence in the human brain.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Mitochondrial Proteostasis Requires Genes Encoded in a Neurodevelopmental Syndrome Locus that are Necessary for Synapse Function

Eukaryotic cells maintain proteostasis through mechanisms that require cytoplasmic and mitochondrial translation. Genetic defects affecting cytoplasmic translation perturb synapse development, neurotransmission, and are causative of neurodevelopmental disorders such as Fragile X syndrome. In contrast, there is little indication that mitochondrial proteostasis, either in the form of mitochondrial protein translation and/or degradation, is required for synapse development and function. Here we focus on two genes deleted in a recurrent copy number variation causing neurodevelopmental disorders, the 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome. We demonstrate that SLC25A1 and MRPL40, two genes present in this microdeleted segment and whose products localize to mitochondria, interact and are necessary for mitochondrial protein translation and proteostasis. Our Drosophila studies show that mitochondrial ribosome function is necessary for synapse neurodevelopment, function, and behavior. We propose that mitochondrial proteostasis perturbations, either by genetic or environmental factors, are a novel pathogenic mechanism for neurodevelopmental disorders.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Synaptic Proteome Alterations in the Primary Auditory Cortex of Schizophrenia

ImportanceFindings from unbiased genetic studies have consistently implicated synaptic protein networks in Schizophrenia (Sz), but the molecular pathology at these networks and their potential contribution to the synaptic and circuit deficits thought to underlie disease symptoms remain unknown.\n\nObjectiveTo determine if protein levels are altered within synapses from primary auditory cortex (A1) of subjects with Sz; and if so, are these differences restricted to the synapse or present throughout the grey matter?\n\nDesignA paired case-control design was utilized for this study. Biochemical fractional - targeted Mass Spectrometry (MS) was used to measure the levels of >350 proteins in A1 grey matter homogenate and synaptosome preparations, respectively. All experimenters were blinded to diagnosis at every stage of sample preparation, MS analysis, and raw data processing. The effects of postmortem interval (PMI) and antipsychotic drug treatment on protein levels were assessed in mouse and monkey models, respectively.\n\nSettingAll cases were recruited from a single site, The Allegheny County Office of the Medical Examiner, and all tissues were processed at the University of Pittsburgh.\n\nParticipantsBrain specimens from all subjects were obtained during autopsies conducted at the Allegheny County Office of the Medical Examiner after receiving consent from the next-of-kin. An independent panel of experienced clinicians made consensus Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition diagnoses. Unaffected comparison subjects underwent identical assessments and were determined to be free of lifetime psychiatric illness. Each Sz subject was matched by sex, and as closely as possible for age and PMI, with one unaffected comparison subject.\n\nMain Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary measures were homogenate and synaptosome protein levels and their co-regulation network features. Prior to data collection we hypothesized: 1. That levels of canonical postsynaptic proteins in A1 synaptosome preparations would differ between Sz and control subjects; and 2. That these differences would not be explained by changes in total A1 homogenate protein levels.\n\nResultsMean subject age was 48 years for both groups with a range of 17-83; each group included 35 males and 13 females; mean PMI was 17.7 hours in controls and 17.9 in Sz. We observed robust alterations (q < 0.05) in synaptosome levels of canonical mitochondrial and postsynaptic proteins that were highly co-regulated and not readily explained by postmortem interval, antipsychotic drug treatment, synaptosome yield, or underlying alterations in homogenate protein levels.\n\nConclusions and RelevanceOur findings indicate a robust and highly coordinated rearrangement of the synaptic proteome likely driven by aberrant synaptic, not cell-wide, proteostasis. In line with unbiased genetic findings, our results identified alterations in synaptic levels of postsynaptic proteins, providing a road map to identify the specific cells and circuits that are impaired in Sz A1.

neuroscience↗