Biology subjects

Glaser, L. V.

Publications and source records attributed to Glaser, L. V..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Connecting the Dots: PHF13 and cohesin promote polymer-polymer phase separation of chromatin into chromosomes

How interphase chromatin compacts into mitotic chromosomes has eluded researchers for over a century. Here we show that PHF13, a tightly regulated H3K4me epigenetic reader, and cohesin, a mediator of chromatin architecture, cooperate to drive polymer-polymer-phase-separation (PPPS) and higher order compaction of chromatin into chromosomes. PHF13 interacts with cohesin, shows similar dynamics during mitosis, and their co-depletion dramatically impairs mitotic condensation. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that PHF13 stabilizes cohesin chromatin interactions and that itself oligomerizes, resulting in a polymer with increased chromatin avidity and the ability to bridge neighboring and distant nucleosomes. Consistently, molecular dynamic simulations modelling the ability of PHF13 and cohesin to drive chromatin phase separations recapitulated our in vivo observations and are in line with 2-step condensation models.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Assessing genome-wide dynamic changes in enhancer activity during early mESC differentiation by FAIRE-STARR-seq

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) can differentiate into any given cell type and therefore represent a versatile model to study the link between gene regulation and differentiation. To quantitatively assess the dynamics of enhancer activity during the early stages of murine ESC differentiation, we analyzed accessible genomic regions using STARR-seq, a massively parallel reporter assay. This resulted in a genome-wide quantitative map of active mESC enhancers, in pluripotency and during the early stages of differentiation. We find that only a minority of accessible regions is active and that such regions are enriched near promoters, characterized by specific chromatin marks, enriched for distinct sequence motifs, and modeling shows that active regions can be predicted from sequence alone. Regions that change their activity upon retinoic acid-induced differentiation are more prevalent at distal intergenic regions when compared to constitutively active enhancers. Further, analysis of differentially active enhancers verified the contribution of individual TF motifs toward activity and inducibility as well as their role in regulating endogenous genes. Notably, the activity of retinoic acid receptor alpha (RAR) occupied regions can either increase or decrease upon the addition of its ligand, retinoic acid, with the direction of the change correlating with spacing and orientation of the RAR consensus motif and the co-occurrence of additional sequence motifs. Together, our genome-wide enhancer activity map elucidates features associated with enhancer activity levels, identifies regulatory regions disregarded by computational prediction tools, and provides a resource for future studies into regulatory elements in mESCs.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

CRUP: A comprehensive framework to predict condition-specific regulatory units

We present the software CRUP (Condition-specific Regulatory Units Prediction) to infer from epigenetic marks a list of regulatory units consisting of dynamically changing enhancers with their target genes. The workflow consists of a novel pre-trained enhancer predictor that can be reliably applied across cell lines and species, solely based on histone modification ChIP-seq data. Enhancers are subsequently assigned to different conditions and correlated with gene expression to derive regulatory units. We thoroughly test and then apply CRUP to a rheumatoid arthritis model, identifying enhancer-gene pairs comprising known disease genes as well as new candidate genes.\n\nAvailabilityhttps://github.com/VerenaHeinrich/CRUP

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Expanding the repertoire of glucocorticoid receptor target genes by engineering genomic response elements

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR), a hormone-activated transcription factor, binds to a myriad of genomic binding sites yet seems to regulate a much smaller number of genes. Genome-wide analysis of GR binding and gene regulation has shown that the likelihood of GR-dependent regulation increases with decreased distance of its binding to the transcriptional start site of a gene. To test if we can adopt this knowledge to expand the repertoire of GR target genes, we used homology directed repair (HDR)-mediated genome editing to add a single GR binding site directly upstream of the transcriptional start site of four genes. To our surprise, we found that the addition of a single GR binding site can be enough to convert a gene into a GR target. The gain of GR-dependent regulation was observed for two out of four genes analyzed and coincided with acquired GR binding at the introduced binding site. However, the gene-specific gain of GR-dependent regulation could not be explained by obvious differences in chromatin accessibility between converted genes and their non-converted counterparts. Further, by introducing GR binding sequences with different nucleotide compositions, we show that activation can be facilitated by distinct sequences without obvious differences in activity between the GR binding sequence variants we tested. The approach to use genome engineering to build genomic response elements facilitates the generation of cell lines with tailored repertoires of GR-responsive genes and a framework to test and refine our understanding of the cis-regulatory logic of gene regulation by testing if engineered response elements behave as predicted.

bioengineering↗