bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Glaenzer, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Glaenzer, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Triggering closure of a sialic acid TRAP transporter substrate binding protein through binding of natural or artificial substrates

The pathogens Vibrio cholerae and Haemophilus influenzae use tripartite ATP-independent periplasmic transporters (TRAPs) to scavenge sialic acid from host tissues. They use it as a nutrient or to evade the innate immune system by sialylating surface lipopolysaccharides. An essential component of TRAP transporters is a periplasmic substrate binding protein (SBP). Without substrate, the SBP has been proposed to rest in an open-state, which is not recognised by the transporter. Substrate binding induces a conformational change of the SBP and it is thought that this closed state is recognised by the transporter, triggering substrate translocation. Here we use real time single molecule FRET experiments and crystallography to investigate the open- to closed-state transition of VcSiaP, the SBP of the sialic acid TRAP transporter from V. cholerae. We show that the conformational switching of VcSiaP is strictly substrate induced, confirming an important aspect of the proposed transport mechanism. Two new crystal structures of VcSiaP provide insights into the closing mechanism. While the first structure contains the natural ligand, sialic acid, the second structure contains an artificial peptide in the sialic acid binding site. Together, the two structures suggest that the ligand itself stabilises the closed state and that SBP closure is triggered by physically bridging the gap between the two lobes of the SBP. Finally, we demonstrate that the affinity for the artificial peptide substrate can be substantially increased by varying its amino acid sequence and by this, serve as a starting point for the development of peptide-based inhibitors of TRAP transporters.

biophysics

Cross-validation of distance measurements in proteins by PELDOR/DEER and single-molecule FRET

Pulsed electron-electron double resonance spectroscopy (PELDOR or DEER) and single molecule Forster resonance energy transfer spectroscopy (smFRET) are recent additions to the toolbox of integrative structural biology. Both methods are frequently used to visualize conformational changes and to determine nanometer-scale distances in biomacromolecules including proteins and nucleic acids. A prerequisite for the application of PELDOR/DEER and smFRET is the presence of suitable spin centers or fluorophores in the target molecule, which are usually introduced via chemical biology methods. The application portfolio of the two methods is overlapping: each allows determination of distances, to monitor distance changes and to visualize conformational heterogeneity and -dynamics. Both methods can provide qualitative information that facilitates mechanistic understanding, for instance on conformational changes, as well as quantitative data for structural modelling. Despite their broad application, a comprehensive comparison of the accuracy of PELDOR/DEER and smFRET is still missing and we set out here to fill this gap. For this purpose, we prepared a library of double cysteine mutants of three well-studied substrate binding proteins that undergo large-scale conformational changes upon ligand binding. The distances between the introduced spin- or fluorescence labels were determined via PELDOR/DEER and smFRET, using established standard experimental protocols and data analysis routines. The experiments were conducted in the presence and absence of the natural ligands to investigate how well the ligand-induced conformational changes could be detected by the two methods. Overall, we found good agreement for the determined distances, yet some surprising inconsistencies occurred. In our set of experiments, we identified the source of discrepancies as the use of cryoprotectants for PELDOR/DEER and label-protein interactions for smFRET. Our study highlights strength and weaknesses of both methods and paves the way for a higher confidence in quantitative comparison of PELDOR/DEER and smFRET results in the future.

biophysics