Biology subjects

Gkatzionis, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Gkatzionis, A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2019

Genetic determinants of lipids and cardiovascular disease outcomes: a wide-angled Mendelian randomization investigation

AimsTo systematically investigate causal relationships between circulating lipids and cardiovascular outcomes, using a Mendelian randomization approach.\n\nMethods and ResultsIn the primary analysis, we performed two-sample multivariable Mendelian randomization using data from participants of European ancestry. We also conducted univariable analyses using inverse-variance weighted and robust methods, and gene-specific analyses using variants that can be considered as proxies for specific lipid-lowering medications. We obtained associations with lipid fractions from the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium, a meta-analysis of 188,577 participants, and genetic associations with cardiovascular outcomes from 367,703 participants in UK Biobank.\n\nFor LDL-cholesterol, in addition to the expected positive associations with coronary artery disease (CAD) risk (odds ratio per 1 standard deviation increase [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.35-1.57) and other atheromatous outcomes (ischemic cerebrovascular disease and peripheral vascular disease), we found independent associations of genetically-predicted LDL-cholesterol with abdominal aortic aneurysm (OR 1.75; 95%CI 1.40-2.17), and aortic valve stenosis (OR 1.46; 95%CI 1.25-1.70). Genetically-predicted triglyceride levels were positively associated with CAD (OR 1.25; 95%CI 1.12-1.40), aortic valve stenosis (OR 1.29; 95%CI 1.04-1.61), and hypertension (OR 1.17; 95%CI 1.07-1.27), but inversely associated with venous thromboembolism (OR 0.79; 95%CI 0.67-0.93). The positive associations of genetically-predicted LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides with heart failure and aortic stenosis appeared to be mediated by CAD.\n\nConclusionLowering LDL-cholesterol is likely to prevent abdominal aortic aneurysm and aortic stenosis, in addition to CAD and other atheromatous cardiovascular outcomes. Lowering triglycerides is likely to prevent CAD and aortic valve stenosis, but may increase risk of thromboembolism.

epidemiology↗

bioRxiv2019

Bayesian Variable Selection with a Pleiotropic Loss Function in Mendelian Randomization

Mendelian randomization is the use of genetic variants as instruments to assess the existence of a causal relationship between a risk factor and an outcome. A Mendelian randomization analysis requires a set of genetic variants that are strongly associated with the risk factor and only associated with the outcome through their effect on the risk factor. We describe a novel variable selection algorithm for Mendelian randomization that can identify sets of genetic variants which are suitable in both these respects. Our algorithm is applicable in the context of two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization and employs a recently proposed theoretical extension of the traditional Bayesian statistics framework, including a loss function to penalize genetic variants that exhibit pleiotropic effects. The algorithm offers robust inference through the use of model averaging, as we illustrate by running it on a range of simulation scenarios and comparing it against established pleiotropy-robust Mendelian randomization methods. In a real data application, we study the effect of systolic and diastolic blood pressure on the risk of suffering from coronary heart disease. Based on a recent large-scale GWAS for blood pressure, we use 395 genetic variants for systolic and 391 variants for diastolic blood pressure. Both traits are shown to have significant risk-increasing effects on coronary heart disease risk.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

Shared mechanisms between coronary heart disease and depression: findings from a large UK general population-based cohort

While comorbidity between coronary heart disease (CHD) and depression is evident, it is unclear whether the two diseases have shared underlying mechanisms. We performed a range of analyses in 367,703 unrelated middle-aged participants of European ancestry from UK Biobank, a population based cohort study, to assess whether comorbidity is primarily due to genetic or environmental factors, and to test whether cardiovascular risk factors and CHD are likely to be causally related to depression using Mendelian randomization. We showed family history of heart disease was associated with a 20% increase in depression risk (95% confidence interval [CI] 16% to 24%, p<0.0001), but a genetic risk score that is strongly associated with CHD risk was not associated with depression. An increase of one standard deviation in the CH D genetic risk score was associated with 71% higher CHD risk, but 1% higher depression risk (95% CI 0% to 3%; p=0.11). Mendelian randomization analyses suggested that triglycerides, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) are likely causal risk factors for depression. The odds ratio for depression per standard deviation increase in genetically-predicted triglycerides was 1.18 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.27; p=2x10-5); per unit increase in genetically-predicted log-transformed I L-6 was 0.74 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.89; p=0.0012); and per unit increase in genetically-predicted log-transformed CRP was 1.18 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.29; p=0.0009). Our analyses suggest that comorbidity between depression and CHD arises largely from shared environmental factors. I L-6, CRP and triglycerides, are likely to be causally linked with depression, so could be targets for treatment and prevention of depression.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Improving on a modal-based estimation method: model averaging for consistent and efficient estimation in Mendelian randomization when a plurality of candidate instruments are valid

BackgroundA robust method for Mendelian randomization does not require all genetic variants to be valid instruments to give consistent estimates of a causal parameter. Several such methods have been developed, including a mode-based estimation method giving consistent estimates if a plurality of genetic variants are valid instruments; that is, there is no larger subset of invalid instruments estimating the same causal parameter than the subset of valid instruments.\n\nMethodsWe here develop a model averaging method that gives consistent estimates under the same plurality of valid instruments assumption. The method considers a mixture distribution of estimates derived from each subset of genetic variants. The estimates are weighted such that subsets with more genetic variants receive more weight, unless variants in the subset have heterogeneous causal estimates, in which case that subset is severely downweighted. The mode of this mixture distribution is the causal estimate. This heterogeneity-penalized model averaging method has several technical advantages over the previously proposed mode-based estimation method.\n\nResultsThe heterogeneity-penalized model averaging method outperformed the mode-based estimation in terms of effciency and outperformed other robust methods in terms of Type 1 error rate in an extensive simulation analysis. The proposed method suggests two distinct mechanisms by which inflammation affects coronary heart disease risk, with subsets of variants suggesting both positive and negative causal effects.\n\nConclusionsThe heterogeneity-penalized model averaging method is an additional robust method for Mendelian randomization with excellent theoretical and practical properties, and can reveal features in the data such as the presence of multiple causal mechanisms. (249 words)\n\nKey messagesO_LIWe propose a heterogeneity-penalized model averaging method that gives consistent causal estimates if a weighted plurality of the genetic variants are valid instruments.\nC_LIO_LIThe method calculates causal estimates based on all subsets of genetic variants, and upweights subsets containing several genetic variants with similar causal estimates.\nC_LIO_LIThe method is asymptotically effcient and does not rely on bootstrapping to obtain a confidence interval, nor is the confidence interval constrained to be symmetric.\nC_LIO_LIIn particular, the confidence interval can include multiple disjoint intervals, suggesting the presence of multiple causal mechanisms by which the risk factor influences the outcome.\nC_LIO_LIThe method can incorporate biological knowledge to upweight the contribution of genetic variants with stronger plausibility of being valid instruments.\nC_LI

genetics↗