bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ginot, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Ginot, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Automatically producing large morphometric datasets from natural history collection images: a case study of Lepidoptera wing shape

Publicly available image data (2D and 3D) from biological specimens is becoming extremely widespread, notably following digitization efforts from natural history institutions worldwide. To deal with this huge amount of data, high-throughput phenotyping methods are being developed by researchers, to extract biologically meaningful data, in correlation with the burgeoning of the field of phenomics. Here we explore the potential of a combination of simple image treatment algorithms, with a geometric morphometrics contour analysis, applicable to strongly standardized images such as collections of Lepidotera. Using a previously manually landmarked dataset of Morpho butterflies, we show that our automated approach can produce a morphospace similar to that produced by a manual approach. Although the former is more noisy than the latter, it appears to pick up phylogenetic and to some extent ecological signal. Applying then the same approach to a large dataset of images from two different museums, we produce a morphospace containing >5000 specimens, representing 851 species in 24 families of butterflies and moths. The most notable feature of this space is that Sphingidae morphology is clearly separate from the rest, and appears much more constrained. We also show some indirect evidence that at this large interspecific level, potential museum related bias (e.g. inter-user bias in specimen preparation and photography) can be negligible. Altogether, our results suggest that this approach has the potential to produce large-scale analysis of morphology, and could be refined to include more specimens.

evolutionary biology↗

Bite force performance from wild derived mice has undetectable heritability despite having heritable morphological components.

Fitness-related traits tend to have low heritabilities. Conversely, morphology tends to be highly heritable. Yet, many fitness-related performance traits such as running speed or bite force depend critically on morphology. Craniofacial morphology correlates with bite performance in several groups including rodents. However, within species, this relationship is less clear, and the genetics of performance, morphology and function are rarely analyzed in combination. Here, we use a half-sib design in outbred wild-derived Mus musculus to study the morphology-bite force relationship and determine whether there is additive genetic (co-)variance for these traits. Results suggest that bite force has undetectable additive genetic variance and heritability in this sample, while morphological traits related mechanically to bite force exhibit varying levels of heritability. The most heritable traits include the length of the mandible which relates to bite force. Despite its correlation with morphology, realized bite force was not heritable, which suggests it is less responsive to selection in comparison to its morphological determinants. We explain this paradox with a non-additive, many-to-one mapping hypothesis of heritable change in complex traits. We furthermore propose that performance traits could evolve if pleiotropic relationships among the determining traits are modified.

evolutionary biology↗