bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Gilliland, C. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Gilliland, C. A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Gut bacteria induce heterologous immune priming in Rhodnius prolixus encompassing both humoral and cellular immune responses

Insects lack the adaptive, antibody mediated responses of vertebrates, yet they possess a robust innate immune system capable of defending the host against pathogens. Immune priming has been observed in multiple insect species, wherein exposure to a pathogen provides protection against subsequent infections by the pathogen. Less frequently, heterologous immune priming has been observed where exposure to one bacterial species provides protection against other species. We determined that Rhodococcus rhodnii, a gut symbiont of the kissing bug Rhodnius prolixus, induces a strong heterologous immune priming effect, while axenic bugs lacking any gut bacteria are highly susceptible to pathogens in their hemolymph. Commensal Escherichia coli provides a less robust protective effect than R. rhodnii. R. rhodnii must be alive within the insect as dead bacteria do not stimulate immune priming and pathogen resistance. Removal of R. rhodnii from the gut reduces resistance to pathogens while restoring it to otherwise axenic bugs improves resistance to pathogens, though not completely. R. rhodnii and E. coli activate both the Imd and Toll pathways, indicating cross-activation of the pathways and demonstrating the canonical Drosophila immune response has diverged in Hemiptera. Silencing of either pathway leads to a loss of the protective effect. Several antimicrobial peptides are induced in the fat body by presence of gut bacteria. When E. coli is in the gut, expression of antimicrobial peptides is often higher than when R. rhodnii, though R. rhodnii stimulates proliferation of hemocytes and induce a stronger melanization response. Hemolymph from R. rhodnii bugs has a greater ability to convert the melanin precursor DOPA to melanization products than axenic or E. coli-harboring bugs. These results demonstrate that R. rhodniis benefits to its host extend beyond nutritional provisioning, playing an important role in the host immune system. Author SummaryInsects often form beneficial relationships with bacteria allowing them to eat nutritionally deficient diets. In insects that only consume blood, symbionts are necessary to provide B vitamins absent in the host diet. There is a growing appreciation that in some of these symbiotic associations, the bacteria provide services beyond nutrition. We show that in kissing bugs, which feed exclusively on vertebrate blood and require bacterial symbionts for development, these symbiotic bacteria are important in activating the insect immune system. Insects with no gut bacteria are highly susceptible to infection and cannot mount an effective immune response. The bacteria reside exclusively in the insect gut yet protect against infections in the rest of the insects body. The bacteria must be alive to prime the immune system, and the response is dependent on the species of bacteria in the gut, with symbiotic bacteria providing stronger protection against infection and inducing a broader array of immune responses than commensal bacteria. This study expands our understanding of the role of beneficial bacteria in insect immunity and demonstrates that immune systems differ between major groups of insects.

immunology↗

Using axenic and gnotobiotic insects to examine the role of different microbes on the development and reproduction of the kissing bug Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera: Reduviidae)

Kissing bugs (Hempitera: Reduviidae) are obligately and exclusively blood feeding insects. Vertebrate blood is thought to provide insufficient B vitamins to insects, which rely on obligate symbiotic relationships with bacteria that provision these nutrients. Kissing bugs harbor environmentally acquired bacteria in their gut lumen, without which they are unable to develop to adulthood. Early experiments identified a single bacterial species, Rhodococcus rhodnii, as a symbiont of Rhodnius prolixus, but modern studies of the kissing bug microbiome suggest that R. rhodnii is not always present or abundant in wild-caught individuals. We asked whether R. rhodnii or other bacteria alone could function as symbionts of R. prolixus. Bacteria-free (axenic) insects were produced whose microbiome could be experimentally manipulated to produce insects with known microbiomes (gnotobiotic). We found that gnotobiotic insects harboring R. rhodnii alone developed faster, had higher survival, and laid more eggs than gnotobiotic R. prolixus harboring other bacterial monocultures, including other described symbionts of kissing bugs and several related Rhodococcus species. R. rhodnii grew to high titer in the guts of R. prolixus while other tested species were found at much lower abundance. Rhodococcus species tested had nearly identical B vitamin biosynthesis genes, and dietary supplementation of B vitamins had a relatively minor effect on development and survival of gnotobiotic R. prolixus. Our results indicate that R. prolixus have a higher fitness when harboring R. rhodnii than other bacteria tested, and that symbiont B vitamin synthesis is likely a necessary but not sufficient function of gut bacteria in kissing bugs.

microbiology↗