bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Gibson, B. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Gibson, B. A..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Multi-scale structure of chromatin condensates rationalizes phase separation and material properties

Biomolecular condensates, compartments that concentrate molecules without surrounding membranes, are integral to numerous cellular processes. The structure and interaction networks of molecules within condensates remain poorly understood. Using cryo-electron tomography and molecular dynamics simulations we elucidated the structure of phase separated chromatin condensates across scales, from individual amino acids to network architecture. We found that internucleosomal DNA linker length controls nucleosome arrangement and histone tail interactions, shaping the structure of individual chromatin molecules both within and outside condensates. This structural modulation determines the balance between intra- and intermolecular interactions, which in turn governs the molecular network, thermodynamic stability, and material properties of chromatin condensates. Mammalian nuclei contain dense clusters of nucleosomes whose non-random organization is mirrored by the reconstituted condensates. Our work explains how the structure of individual chromatin molecules ultimately determines physical properties of chromatin condensates, with implications for cellular chromatin organization.

biophysics↗

Nucleosome Spacing Can Fine-Tune Higher Order Chromatin Assembly

Cellular chromatin displays heterogeneous structure and dynamics, properties that control diverse nuclear processes. Models invoke phase separation of conformational ensembles of chromatin fibers as a mechanism regulating chromatin organization in vivo. Here we combine biochemistry and molecular dynamics simulations to examine, at single base-pair resolution, how nucleosome spacing controls chromatin phase separation. We show that as DNA linkers extend from 25 bp to 30 bp, as examplars of 10N+5 and 10N (integer N) bp lengths, chromatin condensates become less thermodynamically stable and nucleosome mobility increases. Simulations reveal that this is due to trade-offs between inter- and intramolecular nucleosome stacking, favored by rigid 10N+5 and 10N bp linkers, respectively. A remodeler can induce or inhibit phase separation by moving nucleosomes, changing the balance between intra- and intermolecular stacking. The intrinsic phase separation capacity of chromatin enables fine tuning of compaction and dynamics, likely contributing to heterogeneous chromatin organization in vivo.

biophysics↗

In Diverse Conditions Intrinsic Chromatin Condensates Have Liquid-like Material Properties

Eukaryotic nuclear DNA is wrapped around histone proteins to form nucleosomes, which further assemble to package and regulate the genome. Understanding of the physical mechanisms that contribute to higher order chromatin organization is limited. Previously, we reported the intrinsic capacity of chromatin to undergo phase separation and form dynamic liquid-like condensates, which can be regulated by cellular factors. Recent work from Hansen, Hendzel, and colleagues suggested these intrinsic chromatin condensates are solid in all but a specific set of conditions. Here we show that intrinsic chromatin condensates are fluid in diverse solutions, without need for specific buffering components. Exploring experimental differences in sample preparation and imaging between these two studies, we suggest what may have led Hansen, Hendzel, and colleagues to mischaracterize the innate properties of chromatin condensates. We also describe how liquid-like in vitro behaviors can translate to the locally dynamic but globally constrained movement of chromatin in cells.

biophysics↗

A chromatin phase transition protects mitotic chromosomes against microtubule perforation

Dividing eukaryotic cells package extremely long chromosomal DNA molecules into discrete bodies to enable microtubule-mediated transport of one genome copy to each of the newly forming daughter cells1-3. Assembly of mitotic chromosomes involves DNA looping by condensin4-8 and chromatin compaction by global histone deacetylation9-13. While condensin confers mechanical resistance towards spindle pulling forces14-16, it is not known how histone deacetylation affects material properties and segregation mechanics of mitotic chromosomes. Here, we show how global histone deacetylation at the onset of mitosis induces a chromatin-intrinsic phase transition that endows chromosomes with specific characteristics necessary for their precise movement during cellular division. Deacetylation-mediated compaction of chromatin forms a structure dense in negative charge and allows mitotic chromosomes to resist perforation by microtubules as they are pushed to the metaphase plate. Hyperacetylated mitotic chromosomes lack a defined surface boundary, are frequently perforated by microtubules, and are prone to missegregation. Our study highlights the different contributions of DNA loop formation and chromatin-intrinsic phase separation to genome segregation in dividing cells.

cell biology↗

Inhibition of CRISPR-Cas12a DNA Targeting by Nucleosomes and Chromatin

Genome engineering nucleases, including CRISPR-Cas12a, must access chromatinized DNA. Here, we investigate how Acidaminococcus sp. Cas12a cleaves DNA within human nucleosomes and phase-condensed nucleosome arrays. Using quantitative kinetics approaches, we show that dynamic nucleosome unwrapping regulates DNA target accessibility to Cas12a. Nucleosome unwrapping determines the extent to which both steps of Cas12a binding-PAM recognition and R-loop formation-are inhibited by the nucleosome. Nucleosomes inhibit Cas12a binding even beyond the canonical core particle. Relaxing DNA wrapping within the nucleosome by reducing DNA bendability, adding histone modifications, or introducing a target-proximal nuclease-inactive Cas9 enhances DNA cleavage rates over 10-fold. Surprisingly, Cas12a readily cleaves DNA linking nucleosomes within chromatin-like phase separated nucleosome arrays--with DNA targeting reduced only ~4-fold. This work provides a mechanism for the observation that on-target cleavage within nucleosomes occurs less often than off-target cleavage within nucleosome-depleted regions of cells. We conclude that nucleosome wrapping restricts accessibility to CRISPR-Cas nucleases and anticipate that increasing nucleosome breathing dynamics will improve DNA binding and cleavage in eukaryotic cells.

biochemistry↗

Organization and Regulation of Chromatin by Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation

Genomic DNA is highly compacted in the nucleus of eukaryotic cells as a nucleoprotein assembly called chromatin1. The basic unit of chromatin is the nucleosome, where [~]146 base pair increments of the genome are wrapped and compacted around the core histone proteins2,3. Further genomic organization and compaction occur through higher order assembly of nucleosomes4. This organization regulates many nuclear processes, and is controlled in part by histone post-transtranslational modifications and chromatin-binding proteins. Mechanisms that regulate the assembly and compaction of the genome remain unclear5,6. Here we show that in the presence of physiologic concentrations of mono- and divalent salts, histone tail-driven interactions drive liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of nucleosome arrays, resulting in substantial condensation. Phase separation of nucleosomal arrays is inhibited by histone acetylation, whereas histone H1 promotes phase separation, further compaction, and decreased dynamics within droplets, mirroring the relationship between these modulators and the accessibility of the genome in cells7-10. These results indicate that under physiologically relevant conditions, LLPS is an intrinsic behavior of the chromatin polymer, and suggest a model in which the condensed phase reflects a genomic \"ground state\" that can produce chromatin organization and compaction in vivo. The dynamic nature of this state could enable known modulators of chromatin structure, such as post-translational modifications and chromatin binding proteins, to act upon it and consequently control nuclear processes such as transcription and DNA repair. Our data suggest an important role for LLPS of chromatin in the organization of the eukaryotic genome.

biophysics↗