Biology subjects

Gholipourshahraki, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Gholipourshahraki, T..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Evaluation of Bayesian Linear Regression Models for Gene Set Prioritization in Complex Diseases

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) provide valuable insights into the genetic architecture of complex traits, yet interpreting their results remains challenging due to the polygenic nature of most traits. Gene set analysis offers a solution by aggregating genetic variants into biologically relevant pathways, enhancing the detection of coordinated effects across multiple genes. In this study, we present and evaluate a gene set prioritization approach utilizing Bayesian Linear Regression (BLR) models to uncover shared genetic components among different phenotypes and facilitate biological interpretation. Through extensive simulations and analyses of real traits, we demonstrate the efficacy of the BLR model in prioritizing pathways for complex traits. Simulation studies reveal insights into the models performance under various scenarios, highlighting the impact of factors such as the number of causal genes, proportions of causal variants, heritability, and disease prevalence. Application of both single-trait and multi-trait BLR models to real data, specifically GWAS summary data for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and related phenotypes, identifies significant associations with T2D-related pathways. Furthermore, comparison between single- and multi-trait BLR analyses highlights the superior performance of the multi-trait approach in identifying associated pathways, showcasing increased statistical power when analyzing multiple traits jointly. Additionally, enrichment analysis with integrated data from various public resources supports our results, confirming significant enrichment of diabetes-related genes within the top T2D pathways resulting from the multi-trait analysis. The BLR models ability to handle diverse genomic features, perform regularization, conduct variable selection, and integrate information from multiple traits, genders, and ancestries demonstrates its utility in understanding the genetic architecture of complex traits. Our study provides insights into the potential of the BLR model to prioritize gene sets, offering a flexible framework applicable to various datasets. This model presents opportunities for advancing personalized medicine by exploring the genetic underpinnings of multifactorial traits, potentially leading to tailored therapeutic interventions.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2024

Evaluation of Bayesian Linear Regression Derived Gene Set Test Methods

Gene set tests can pinpoint genes and biological pathways that exert small to moderate effects on complex diseases like Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). By aggregating genetic markers based on biological information, these tests can enhance the statistical power needed to detect genetic associations. Our goal was to develop a gene set test utilizing Bayesian Linear Regression (BLR) models, which account for both linkage disequilibrium (LD) and the complex genetic architectures intrinsic to diseases, thereby increasing the detection power of genetic associations. Through a series of simulation studies, we demonstrated how the efficacy of BLR derived gene set tests is influenced by several factors, including the proportion of causal markers, the size of gene sets, the percentage of genetic variance explained by the gene set, and the genetic architecture of the traits. Comparing our method with other approaches, such as the gold standard MAGMA (Multi-marker Analysis of Genomic Annotation) approach, our BLR gene set test showed superior performance. This suggests that our BLR-based approach could more accurately identify genes and biological pathways underlying complex diseases.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2023

Evaluation of Bayesian Linear Regression Models as a Fine Mapping tool

Our aim was to evaluate Bayesian Linear Regression (BLR) models with BayesC and BayesR priors as a fine mapping tool and compare them to the state-of-the-art external models: FINEMAP, SuSIE-RSS, SuSIE-Inf and FINEMAP-Inf. Based on extensive simulations, we evaluated the different models based on F1 classification score. The different models were applied on quantitative and binary UK Biobank (UKB) phenotypes and evaluated based upon predictive accuracy and features of credible sets (CSs). We used over 533K genotyped and 6.6 million imputed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for simulations and UKB phenotypes respectively, from over 335K UKB White British Unrelated samples. We simulated phenotypes from low (GA1) to moderate (GA2) polygenicity, heritability (h2) of 10% and 30%, causal SNPs ({pi}) of 0.1% and 1% sampled genome-wide, and disease prevalence (PV) of 5% and 15%. Single marker summary statistics and in-sample linkage disequilibrium were used to fit models in regions defined by lead SNPs. BayesR improved the F1 score, averaged across all simulations, between 27.26% and 13.32% relative to the external models. Predictive accuracy quantified as variance explained (R2), averaged across all the UKB quantitative phenotypes, with BayesR was decreased by 5.32% (SuSIE-Inf) and 3.71% (FINEMAP-Inf), and was increased by 7.93% (SuSIE-RSS) and 8.3% (BayesC). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve averaged across all the UKB binary phenotypes, with BayesR was increased between 0.40% and 0.05% relative to the external models. SuSIE-RSS and BayesR, demonstrated the highest number of CSs, with BayesC and BayesR exhibiting the smallest average median size CSs in the UKB phenotypes. The BLR models performed similar to the external models. Specifically, BayesRs performance closely aligned with SuSIE-Inf and FINEMAP-Inf models. Collectively, our findings from both simulations and application of the models in the UKB phenotypes support that the BLR models are efficient fine mapping tools.

genomics↗