Biology subjects

Gerrish, P. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Gerrish, P. J..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2021

Natural selection promotes the evolution of recombination 1: among selected genotypes

Shuffling ones genetic material with another individual seems a risky endeavor more likely to decrease than to increase offspring fitness. This intuitive argument is commonly employed to explain why the ubiquity of sex and recombination in nature is enigmatic. It is predicated on the notion that natural selection assembles selectively well-matched combinations of genes that recombination would break up resulting in low-fitness offspring - a notion often stated in the literature as a self-evident premise. We show however that, upon closer examination, this premise is flawed: we find to the contrary that natural selection in fact has an encompassing tendency to assemble selectively mismatched gene combinations; recombination breaks up these selectively mismatched combinations (on average), assembles selectively matched combinations, and should thus be favored. The new perspective our findings offer suggests that sex and recombination are not so enigmatic but are instead unavoidable byproducts of natural selection.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Natural selection promotes the evolution of recombination 2: during the selective process

The ubiquity of sex and recombination in nature has eluded unified explanation since the time of Darwin. Conditions that promote the evolution of recombination, broadly defined as any form of genetic mixing, are fairly well understood: it is favored when genomes tend to contain more selectively mismatched combinations of alleles than can be explained by chance alone. Yet, while a variety of theoretical approaches have been put forth to explain why such conditions would prevail in natural populations, each has turned out to be of limited scope and applicability. Here, we show, simply and surprisingly, that natural selection acting on standing heritable variation always creates conditions favoring the evolution of recombination, in expectation. Specifically, we find that, in expectation: 1) the mean selective advantage of recombinants is non-negative, 2) the mean selective advantage of a recombination-competent modifier is non-negative, and 3) the asymptotic frequency of a recombination-competent modifier is close to one and is independent of the strength of selection. Remarkably, these findings are independent of the distribution of genic fitnesses in the standing heritable variation upon which natural selection acts, implying that the source of this variation is immaterial. Taken together, our findings indicate that: 1) the evolution of recombination should be promoted in expectation wherever natural selection is operating, and 2) sex and recombination may have evolved more as a byproduct than as a catalyst of natural selection.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Why are viral genomes so fragile? The bottleneck hypothesis

If they undergo new mutations at each replication cycle, why are RNA viral genomes so fragile, with most mutations being either strongly deleterious or lethal? Here we provide theoretical evidence for the hypothesis that genetic fragility evolves as a consequence of the pervasive population bottlenecks experienced by viral populations at various stages of their life cycles. Modelling within-host viral populations as multi-type branching processes, we show that mutational fragility lowers the rate at which Mullers ratchet clicks and increases the survival probability through multiple bottlenecks. In the context of a susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered epidemiological model, we find that the attack rate of fragile viral strains can exceed that of more robust strains, particularly at low infectivities and high mutation rates. Our findings highlight the importance of demographic events such as transmission bottlenecks in shaping the genetic architecture of viral pathogens.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Natural selection and the advantage of recombination

The ubiquity of sex and recombination in nature is widely viewed as enigmatic, despite an abundance of limited-scope explanations. Natural selection, it seems, should amplify well-matched combinations of genes. Recombination would break up these well-matched combinations and should thus be suppressed. We show, to the contrary, that on average: 1) natural selection amplifies poorly-matched gene combinations and 2) creates time-averaged negative associations in the process. Recombination breaks up these poorly-matched combinations, neutralizes the negative associations, and should thus be passively and universally favored.

evolutionary biology↗