Biology subjects

Gebelein, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Gebelein, B..

11 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

A model of transcriptional bursting dynamics based on coupling between chromatin and enhancer states

In recent years, it has become evident that transcription is not always a continuous process. Rather, many genes exhibit bursting behavior characterized by discrete periods of transcriptional activity and inactivity. While transcriptional bursting has been broadly observed across different organisms, from bacteria to mammals, we lack a mechanistic understanding of the molecular events that regulate this widespread process. Specifically, how the expression of a bursty gene is quantitatively determined by different molecular factors such as the concentration of transcription factors (TF) and architecture of the enhancers is not well understood. Here, we introduce a model based on the interplay between chromatin state and TF binding in order to describe bursting dynamics. We leverage the widespread Monod-Wyman-Changeux two-state model to predict the dependence of transcriptional bursting dynamics on TF concentration, binding affinity, and number of TF binding sites. We use the model to qualitatively reproduce the behavior of bursting dynamics observed in the C. elegans gonad. Overall, we provide a tractable model for transcriptional bursting that offers mechanistic insights into the factors regulating transcriptional bursting and generates experimentally testable predictions capable of uncovering the molecular basis of this widespread process.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2025

Decoding the mechanisms of cooperative DNA binding by the Paired-like homeodomain family

The 36 Paired-like homeodomain transcription factors are required for the development of many cell types, tissues, and organs as missense variants in 24 genes are associated with a variety of diseases and developmental disorders. How these factors identify distinct genomic targets using highly similar DNA binding domains is not fully understood. Here, we focus on determining how the Paired-like homeodomain factors gain DNA binding specificity by cooperatively binding palindromic sites spaced three base pairs apart (P3 site). Through structural, biochemical, and bioinformatic approaches, we define 11 rules that describe homeodomain residues that are critical, permissive, and inhibitory to cooperativity on the P3 site. Applying these rules, we successfully altered the cooperative behavior of Paired-like factors, identified residues that prevent the related Antennapedia class of homeodomains from binding cooperatively, and predict that thirty-eight disease-associated missense variants across ten Paired-like proteins alter cooperativity. Using quantitative DNA binding assays, we confirmed eleven of twelve of these disease-associated variants impact cooperativity but not DNA binding affinity. These findings reveal the importance of cooperativity in defining DNA binding specificity and highlight how missense variants associated with as many as fifteen different diseases can selectively disrupt cooperative DNA binding.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2025

A mouse model of Adams-Oliver Syndrome reveals defective Notch1 signaling in endothelial cells as a driver of pathogenesis

Adams-Oliver Syndrome (AOS) is a rare congenital disorder characterized by scalp, limb, and cardiovascular defects. While variants in the NOTCH1 receptor, DLL4 ligand, and RBPJ transcription factor have been implicated in AOS, the driving tissue types and molecular mechanisms by which these variants cause pathogenesis are unknown. Here, we used quantitative binding assays to show that AOS-associated RBPJ missense variants compromise DNA binding but not cofactor binding. These findings suggest that AOS-associated RBPJ variants do not function as loss-of-function alleles but instead act as dominant-negative proteins that sequester cofactors from DNA. Consistent with this idea, mice carrying an AOS-associated Rbpj allele develop dominant phenotypes that include lethality and cardiovascular defects in a Notch1 heterozygous background, whereas Notch1 and Rbpj compound heterozygous null alleles are well-tolerated. To facilitate studies into the key tissues driving AOS pathogenesis, we employed conditional genetics to isolate the contribution of the vasculature to the development of AOS-like phenotypes. Importantly, our studies show that expression of the Rbpj AOS allele in endothelial cells is both necessary and sufficient to cause lethality and cardiovascular defects. These data establish that defective Notch1 signaling in the vasculature is a key driver of pathogenesis in this AOS mouse model.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Structural and biochemical characterization of the ALX4 dimer reveals novel insights into how disease alleles impact ALX4 function

1.How homeodomain proteins gain sufficient DNA binding specificity to regulate diverse processes has been a long-standing question. Here, we determine how the ALX4 Paired-like protein achieves DNA binding specificity for a TAAT - NNN - ATTA dimer site. We first show that ALX4 binds this motif independently of its co-factor, TWIST1, in cranial neural crest cells. Structural analysis identified seven ALX4 residues that participate in dimer binding, many of which are conserved across the Paired-like family, but not other homeodomain proteins. Unexpectedly, the two ALX4 proteins within the dimer use distinct residues to form asymmetric protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions to mediate cooperativity. Moreover, we found that ALX4 cooperativity is required for transcriptional activation and that ALX4 disease variants cause distinct molecular defects that include loss of cooperativity. These findings provide new insights into how Paired-like factors gain DNA specificity and show how disease variants can be stratified based on their molecular defects.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Cooperative Gsx2-DNA Binding Requires DNA Bending and a Novel Gsx2 Homeodomain Interface

The conserved Gsx homeodomain (HD) transcription factors specify neural cell fates in animals from flies to mammals. Like many HD proteins, Gsx factors bind A/T-rich DNA sequences prompting the question -- how do HD factors that bind similar DNA sequences in vitro regulate specific target genes in vivo? Prior studies revealed that Gsx factors bind DNA both as a monomer on individual A/T-rich sites and as a cooperative homodimer to two sites spaced precisely seven base pairs apart. However, the mechanistic basis for Gsx DNA binding and cooperativity are poorly understood. Here, we used biochemical, biophysical, structural, and modeling approaches to (1) show that Gsx factors are monomers in solution and require DNA for cooperative complex formation; (2) define the affinity and thermodynamic binding parameters of Gsx2/DNA interactions; (3) solve a high-resolution monomer/DNA structure that reveals Gsx2 induces a 20{degrees} bend in DNA; (4) identify a Gsx2 protein-protein interface required for cooperative DNA binding; and (5) determine that flexible spacer DNA sequences enhance Gsx2 cooperativity on dimer sites. Altogether, our results provide a mechanistic basis for understanding the protein and DNA structural determinants that underlie cooperative DNA binding by Gsx factors, thereby providing a deeper understanding of HD specificity.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2021

A Drosophila Su(H) Model of Adams-Oliver Syndrome Reveals Notch Cofactor Titration as a Mechanism Underlying Developmental Defects

Notch signaling is a conserved pathway that converts extracellular receptor-ligand interactions into changes in gene expression via a single transcription factor (CBF1/RBPJ in mammals; Su(H) in Drosophila). In humans, RBPJ variants have been linked to Adams-Oliver syndrome (AOS), a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by scalp, cranium, and limb defects. Here, we found that a previously described Drosophila Su(H) allele encodes a missense mutation that alters an analogous residue found in an AOS-associated RBPJ variant. Importantly, genetic studies support a model that Drosophila with a single copy of the AOS-like Su(H) allele behave in an opposing manner as flies with a Su(H) null allele due to a dominant activity of sequestering either the Notch co-activator or the antagonistic Hairless co-repressor. Consistent with this model, AOS-like Su(H) and Rbpj variants decrease DNA binding activity compared to wild type proteins, but these variants do not significantly alter protein binding to the Notch co-activator or the fly and mammalian co-repressors, respectively. Taken together, these data suggest a cofactor sequestration mechanism underlies AOS phenotypes associated with RBPJ variants, whereby a single RBPJ allele encodes a protein with compromised DNA binding activity that retains cofactor binding, resulting in Notch target gene dysregulation.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2020

Gli3 utilizes Hand2 to synergistically regulate tissue-specific transcriptional networks

Despite a common understanding that Gli TFs are utilized to reiterate a Hh morphogen gradient, genetic analyses suggest craniofacial development does not completely fit this paradigm. We demonstrated that rather than being driven by a Hh threshold, robust Gli3 transcriptional activity during skeletal and glossal development required interaction with the bHLH TF Hand2. Not only did genetic and expression data support a co-factorial relationship, but genomic analysis further revealed that Gli3 and Hand2 were enriched at regulatory elements for genes essential for mandibular patterning and development. Interestingly, motif analysis at sites co-occupied by Gli3 and Hand2 uncovered mandibular-specific, low-affinity, divergent Gli binding motifs (dGBMs). Functional validation revealed these dGBMs conveyed synergistic activation of Gli targets essential for mandibular patterning and development. In summary, this work elucidates a novel, sequence-dependent mechanism for Gli transcriptional activity within the craniofacial complex that is independent of a graded Hh signal.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Exposure to Mites Sensitizes Intestinal Stem Cell Maintenance, Splenic Marginal Zone B Cell Homeostasis, And Heart Development to Notch Dosage and Cooperativity.

Cooperative DNA binding is a key feature of transcriptional regulation. Here we examined the role of cooperativity in Notch signaling by CRISPR-mediated engineering of mice in which neither Notch1 nor Notch2 can homo- or heterodimerize, essential for cooperative binding to sequence paired sites (SPS) located near many Notch-regulated genes. While most known Notch-dependent phenotypes were unaffected in Notch1/2 dimer-deficient mice, a subset of tissues proved highly sensitive to loss of cooperativity. These phenotypes include heart development, compromising viability in combination with low gene dose, and the gut, developing ulcerative colitis in response to 1% DSS. The most striking phenotypes - gender imbalance and splenic marginal zone B cell lymphoma - emerged in combination with dose reduction or when challenged by chronic fur mite infestation. This study highlights the role of the environment in malignancy and colitis, and is consistent with Notch-dependent anti-parasite immune responses being compromised in the dimer deficient animals. HighlightsO_LINotch dimerization has an in vivo role in contributing to intestinal homeostasis C_LIO_LILoss of cooperativity can manifest as Notch gain or loss of function phenotypes C_LIO_LIMite infestation exacerbates all phenotypes, triggers MZB hyperproliferation in mutant animals C_LIO_LIMite-infested mutant mice develop SMZL with age C_LI

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Physical interactions between Gsx2 and Ascl1 regulate the balance between progenitor expansion and neurogenesis in the mouse lateral ganglionic eminence

The Gsx2 homeodomain transcription factor is required to maintain neural progenitor identity in the lateral ganglionic eminence (LGE) within the developing ventral telencephalon, despite its role in upregulating the neurogenic factor Ascl1. How Gsx2 maintains cells as progenitors in the presence of a pro-differentiation factor is unclear. Here, we show that Gsx2 and Ascl1 are co-expressed in dividing subapical progenitors within the LGE ventricular zone (VZ). Moreover, we show that while Ascl1 misexpression promotes neurogenesis in dorsal telencephalic progenitors that do not express Gsx2, co-expression of Gsx2 with Ascl1 inhibits neurogenesis in these cells. To investigate the mechanisms underlying this inhibition, we used a cell-based luciferase assay to show that Gsx2 reduced the ability of Ascl1 to activate target gene expression in a dose-dependent and DNA binding-independent manner. Yeast 2-hybrid and co-immunoprecipitation assays revealed that Gsx2 physically interacts with the basic-Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH) domain of Ascl1, and DNA binding assays demonstrated that this interaction interferes with the ability of Ascl1 to form homo- or heterodimers with E-proteins such as Tcf3 on DNA. To further assess for in vivo molecular interactions between these transcription factors within the telencephalon, we modified a proximity ligation assay for embryonic tissue sections and found that Ascl1:Gsx2 interactions are enriched within VZ progenitors, whereas Ascl1:Tcf3 interactions predominate in basal progenitors. Altogether, these findings suggest that physical interactions between Gsx2 and Ascl1 limit Ascl1:Ascl1 and Ascl1:Tcf3 interactions, and thereby inhibit Ascl1-dependennt neurogenesis and allow for progenitor expansion within the LGE.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Enhancer architecture sensitizes cell specific responses to Notch gene dose via a bind and discard mechanism

Notch pathway haploinsufficiency can cause severe developmental syndromes with highly variable penetrance. Currently, we have a limited mechanistic understanding of phenotype variability due to gene dosage. Here, we show that inserting a single enhancer containing pioneer transcription factor sites coupled to Notch dimer sites can unexpectedly induce a subset of Drosophila Notch haploinsufficiency phenotypes in an animal with wild type Notch gene dose. Mechanistically, this enhancer couples Notch DNA binding to degradation in a Cdk8-dependent, transcription-independent manner. Using mathematical modeling combined with quantitative trait and expression analysis, we show that tissues requiring long duration Notch signals are more sensitive to perturbations in Notch degradation compared to tissues relying upon short duration processes. These findings support a novel \"bind and discard\" mechanism in which enhancers with specific binding sites promote rapid Notch turnover, reduce Notch-dependent transcription at other loci, and thereby sensitize tissues to gene dose based upon signal duration.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2018

The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila

Hox genes encode a family of transcription factors that, despite having similar in vitro DNA binding preferences, regulate distinct genetic programs along the metazoan anterior-posterior axis. To better define mechanisms of Hox specificity, we compared and contrasted the ability of abdominal Hox factors to regulate two cis-regulatory elements within the Drosophila embryo. Both the Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and Abdominal-A (Abd-A) Hox factors form cooperative complexes with the Extradenticle (Exd) and Homothorax (Hth) transcription factors to repress the distal-less leg selector gene via the DCRE, whereas only Abd-A interacts with Exd and Hth on the RhoA element to activate a rhomboid serine protease gene that stimulates Epidermal Growth Factor secretion. By swapping binding sites between these elements, we found that the RhoA Exd/Hth/Hox site configuration that mediates Abd-A specific activation can also convey transcriptional repression by both Ubx and Abd-A when placed into the DCRE, but only in one orientation. We further show that the orientation and spacing of Hox sites relative to additional transcription factor binding sites within the RhoA and DCRE elements is critical to mediate appropriate cell- and segment-specific output. These results indicate that the interaction between Hox, Exd, and Hth neither determines activation vs repression specificity nor defines Ubx vs Abd-A specificity. Instead the precise integration of Hox sites with additional TF inputs is required for accurate transcriptional output. Taken together, these studies provide new insight into the mechanisms of Hox target and regulatory specificity as well as the constraints placed on regulatory elements to convey appropriate outputs.\n\nAuthor SummaryThe Hox genes encode a family of transcription factors that give cells within each region along the developing body plan a unique identity in animals from worms to mammals. Surprisingly, however, most of the Hox factors bind the same or highly similar DNA sequences. These findings raise a paradox: How can proteins that have highly similar DNA binding properties perform different functions in the animal by regulating different sets of target genes? In this study, we address this question by studying how two Hox factors regulate the expression of target genes that specify leg development and the making of liver-like cells in the developing fly. By comparing and contrasting how Hox target genes are activated and/or repressed, we found that the same Hox binding sites can mediate either activation or repression in a manner that depends upon context. In addition, we found that a Hox binding site that is normally regulated by only one Hox factor, can also be used by more than one Hox factor swapped into another target gene. These findings indicate that the specificity of a Hox factor to regulate target genes does not rely solely upon DNA binding specificity but also requires regulatory specificity.

developmental biology↗