bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Gardechaux, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Gardechaux, G..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Internal perturbation reveals the flexible and adaptive nature of the coordination between decisions and movements

Although growing evidence indicates that decision-making and movement control are tightly coordinated, the functional significance of this coordination remains poorly understood. In particular, it is unclear whether changes in the animals arousal are sufficient to reorganize decision-action coordination in a manner that preserves behavioral efficiency. To address this question, we pharmacologically slowed behavior in rhesus monkeys performing a reaching-based foraging task while leaving task demands unchanged. Under this internal perturbation, prolonged decisions were initially associated with shorter movement durations, revealing a compensatory coordination that reduced the additional temporal cost of slower deliberation. As animals progressively adapted across sessions, decision durations decreased, reward rates increased, and compensatory coordination became less prevalent, giving way to patterns of decision-movement co-regulation. This observation suggests that compensatory adjustments are recruited transiently during adaptation rather than representing a constitutive mode of behavioral control. These findings provide causal evidence that an internally-induced slowing of decision-making is sufficient to reorganize the temporal relationship between decisions and movements. More broadly, they support the view that decision-making and movement execution are regulated as complementary components of a unified adaptive control process that flexibly adjusts the temporal organization of behavior in response to changes in internal state, thereby contributing to the maintenance of efficient reward acquisition.

neuroscience↗

Optimal foraging requires coordinating decisions with movements

Decision-making and motor execution are both constrained by time and energy, and their optimization depends on cost-benefit trade-offs. While many studies suggest that decisions and movements follow common economic principles and can be jointly regulated to maximize reward rate, recent findings indicate that these two processes can also be decoupled or modulated in compensatory ways. This variability raises the question of whether decision-action coordination reflects an optimal strategy aimed at maximizing reward rate, or rather a flexible but suboptimal adaptation to contextual constraints. To address this issue, we trained three macaque monkeys to perform a reaching-based foraging task. The observed adjustments in decision-action coordination of the three monkeys are consistent with the pursuit of a strategy that approximates the theoretical optimum of reward intake rate at the single trial level. The present findings indicate, both behaviorally and theoretically, that coordination between decision and movement is required to optimize behavior in economic terms.

animal behavior and cognition↗