Biology subjects

Garcea, F. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Garcea, F. E..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Causal Lesion Evidence for Two Motor Speech Coordination Networks in the Brain

Speech production is supported by sensory-to-motor transformations to coordinate activity of the larynx and orofacial muscles. Here, we show that lesions to left temporal lobe areas involved in pitch processing cause reduced neural responses when repeating sentences and when humming piano melodies in a dorsal portion of the left precentral gyrus linked to laryngeal motor control. In contrast, lesions to left inferior parietal areas involved in somatosensory processing of speech cause reduced neural responses when repeating sentences but not when humming piano melodies in a ventral portion of the left precentral gyrus linked to orofacial motor control. Analyses in neurotypical participants converge in showing that the dorsal and ventral portions of the left precentral gyrus exhibit strong functional connectivity to left temporal and inferior parietal regions, respectively. These results provide causal lesion evidence that dissociable networks underlie distinct sensory-to-motor transformations supporting laryngeal and orofacial motor control for speech production.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Visual processing of manipulable objects in the ventral stream is modulated by inputs from parietal action systems

Functional object use requires the integration of visuomotor representations processed in the dorsal visual pathway with representations of surface texture and material composition of objects, processed in the ventral visual pathway. Do regions in the ventral visual pathway project outputs to dorsal visual pathway action systems, or are the outputs of the dorsal visual pathway communicated to the ventral visual pathway to modulate processing? And what are the white matter pathways that mediate structural connectivity in support of functional object use? Here we show that the left inferior parietal cortex, a region within the dorsal visual pathway, exerts a direct effect on neural responses in ventral occipital-temporal cortex during visual processing of manipulable objects. We studied a series of consecutively enrolled participants in the pre-operative phase of their neurosurgical care (N = 109) with lesions principally distributed throughout the left hemisphere. Participants completed an object processing category localizer functional MRI experiment in which they viewed images of manipulable objects, animals, faces, and places. We then used Voxel-based Lesion-Activity Mapping (VLAM), a technique in which functional responses in a region-of-interest are used to predict variance in voxel-wise lesion incidence throughout the brain. In the VLAM analyses performed here, we found that lesions to the left anterior intraparietal sulcus and left supramarginal gyrus, two inferior parietal regions known to support object-directed grasping and manipulation, respectively, cause reduced neural responses for manipulable objects (compared to faces, places and animals) in the fusiform gyrus. Parietal lesions do not affect neural responses during visual processing of places in the same region of the fusiform gyrus, even though places elicit stronger responses in the fusiform gyrus than manipulable objects. Seventy-five of 109 participants took part in a common diffusion MRI protocol, permitting a connectome-wide analyses relating white matter fiber integrity to the strength of functional responses for manipulable objects in the left fusiform gyrus. This analysis demonstrated that the descending portion of the left arcuate fasciculus mediates parietal-to-temporal lobe connectivity for manipulable objects, supporting the integration of action representations with conceptual and perceptual attributes of objects. By combining voxel-based and connectome-wide lesion-symptom mapping methods with functional MRI, we have demonstrated that structural connectivity to dorsal visual pathway areas supporting skilled manual action shape category-specific neural responses for manipulable objects within the ventral visual pathway.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Mechanisms and neuroanatomy of response selection in tool and non-tool action tasks: Evidence from left-hemisphere stroke

The ability to select between potential actions is central to the complex process of tool use. After left hemisphere stroke, individuals with limb apraxia make more hand action errors when gesturing the use of tools with conflicting hand actions for grasping-to-move and use (e.g., screwdriver) relative to tools that are grasped-to-move and used with the same hand action (e.g., hammer). Prior research indicates that this grasp-use interference effect is driven by abnormalities in the competitive action selection process. The goal of this project was to determine whether common mechanisms and neural substrates support the competitive selection of task-appropriate responses in both tool and non-tool domains. If so, the grasp-use interference effect in a tool use gesturing task should be correlated with response interference effects in the classic Eriksen flanker and Simon tasks, and at least partly overlapping neural regions should subserve the 3 tasks. Sixty-four left hemisphere stroke survivors (33 with apraxia) participated in the tool- and non-tool interference tasks and underwent T1 anatomical MRI. There were robust grasp-use interference effects (grasp-use conflict test) and response interference effects (Eriksen flanker and Simon tasks), but these effects were not correlated. Lesion-symptom mapping analyses showed that lesions to the left inferior parietal lobule, ventral premotor cortex, and insula were associated with grasp-use interference. Lesions to the left inferior parietal lobule, postcentral gyrus, insula, caudate, and putamen were associated with response interference in the Eriksen flanker task. Lesions to the left caudate and putamen were also associated with response interference in the Simon task. Our results suggest that the selection of hand posture for tool use is mediated by distinct cognitive mechanisms and partly distinct neuroanatomic substrates from those mapping a stimulus to an appropriate motor response in non-tool domains.

neuroscience↗