bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Gandia, K. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Gandia, K. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Caste, sex, and parasitism influence brain plasticity in a social wasp

Phenotypic plasticity is the capacity of a single genotype to exhibit different phenotypes, and can be an adaptive response to specific environmental and social conditions. Social insects are particularly well-suited to study plasticity, because the division of labor amongst females and the different life histories of males and females are associated with specific sensory needs. Here, we take advantage of the social wasp Polistes dominula to explore if brain plasticity is influenced by caste and sex, and the exploitation by the parasite Xenos vesparum. Within sexes, males had proportionally larger optic lobes, while females, regardless of caste, had larger antennal lobes, which is consistent with sensory needs of sex-specific life histories. Within castes, reproductive females had larger calyces, as predicted by their sensory needs for extensive within-colony interactions and forming winter aggregations, than workers who spend more time foraging for nest material and prey. Surprisingly, parasites had different effects on female and male hosts. Female workers were castrated and behaviorally manipulated by female or male parasites, but only showed moderate differences in relative allocation of different brain tissue compared to non-parasitized workers. In contrast, the testes and behavior of parasitized males were essentially unaffected, but they had smaller brains and greater relative volume of most sensory brain regions than non-parasitized males. Our results are consistent with caste and sex mediating brain plasticity in P. dominula and that the parasites manipulation can also drive differential allocation of brain regions depending on host sex.

neuroscience↗

Differential investment in visual and olfactory brain regions mirrors the sensory needs of a paper wasp social parasite and its host

Obligate social parasites evolve traits to effectively locate and then exploit their hosts, whereas hosts have complex social behavioral repertoires, which include sensory recognition to reject potential conspecific intruders and heterospecific parasites. While social parasite and host behaviors have been studied extensively, less is known about how their sensory systems function to meet their specific selective pressures. Here, we compare investment in visual and olfactory brain regions in the paper wasp Polistes dominula, and its obligate social parasite P. sulcifer, to explore the link between sensory systems and brain plasticity. Our results show opposite and significant differences, consistent with their very different life-histories, in the sensory investments between these two closely-related species. Social parasites initially invest in the optic lobes to likely locate their hosts. After host colony usurpation, the parasite increases its brain volume, with specific investment in antennal lobes, which mirrors the behavioral switch from a usurping parasite to an integrated parasitic queen of the host colony. Contrastingly, hosts initially invest in the antennal lobes and sensory processing compared to social parasites, as predicted by their need to maintain social cohesion, allocate colony tasks, and recognize con- and heterospecific intruders. Host queens show a trend of higher investment in all sensory brain regions compared to workers, paralleling differences in task allocations. Our work provides novel insights into how intraspecific brain plasticity can facilitate the unique sensory adaptations needed to perform specific tasks by the host or to transition from searching to successful host exploitation by the social parasite.

neuroscience↗