bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Gamer, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Gamer, M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Neural Substrates of Approach-Avoidance Control in Motivational Conflict

Adaptive behavior requires control over automatic tendencies to approach reward and avoid threat. Dysregulation of this control characterizes disorders such as anxiety or addiction, yet the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we investigated circuits engaged during approach-avoidance control using fMRI with concurrent eye-tracking, and behavioral measures. Forty participants (22 females) completed an approach-avoidance conflict task with free- and forced-choice trials. Each trial comprised anticipation, response (using a joystick to approach/obtain or avoid/forgo outcomes), and outcome phases. Before scanning, participants learned that conditioned stimuli (CS) predicted an aversive stimulation (avCS+), appetitive reward (appCS+), both outcomes (confCS+), or no outcome (neuCS-). Discordant responses (e.g., approaching avCS+) were slower than concordant responses (e.g., avoiding avCS+), confirming heightened control demands. Overcoming threat-driven avoidance specifically recruited the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), while suppressing reward-driven approach lacked distinct neural signatures. During anticipation, confCS+ and avCS+ showed overlapping activation in salience-control networks, including middle/anterior cingulate cortex (MCC/ ACC), anterior insula, IFG, and ventral striatum (VS). Interestingly, confCS+ evoked threat-like anticipatory neurophysiological responses (pupil dilation; ACC/insula activation) but subsequently triggered reward-like approach behavior. Multivariate pattern and psychophysiological interaction analyses revealed that this dissociation was driven by differential encoding of upcoming responses in the ventral striatum during the anticipation phase and by altered functional coupling between the VS and the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ). These findings indicate that motivational control prioritizes salience over valence and suggest a VS-rTPJ network for resolving approach-avoidance conflicts, offering novel insights into neural dynamics of flexible goal-directed behavior. Significance StatementThis study advances our understanding of how the brain dynamically resolves conflicts between approaching rewards and avoiding threats. By measuring neural activity during approach-avoidance conflicts, our study identified overlapping neural circuits for threat and conflict processing (e.g., middle/anterior cingulate, ventral striatum). It revealed that threat-like neural responses to conflicting stimuli triggered approach behaviors resembling reward-motivated actions. Critically, connectivity between the ventral striatum and the temporoparietal junction predicted individual differences in conflict resolution, linking network-level interactions to adaptive behavioral control. These findings suggest salience overrides valence in motivational control and motivate hypothesis-driven tests of network disruption in psychiatric populations.

neuroscience↗

Reduced discrimination between signals of danger and safety but not overgeneralization is linked to exposure to childhood adversity in healthy adults

Childhood adversity is a strong predictor of developing psychopathological conditions. Multiple theories on the mechanisms underlying this association have been suggested which, however, differ in the operationalization of exposure. Altered (threat) learning mechanisms represent central mechanisms by which environmental inputs shape emotional and cognitive processes and ultimately behavior. 1402 healthy participants underwent a fear conditioning paradigm (acquisition training, generalization), while acquiring skin conductance responses (SCRs) and ratings (arousal, valence, and contingency). Childhood adversity was operationalized as (1) dichotomization, and following (2) the specificity model, (3) the cumulative risk model, and (4) the dimensional model. Individuals exposed to childhood adversity showed blunted physiological reactivity in SCRs, but not ratings, and reduced CS+/CS-discrimination during both phases, mainly driven by attenuated CS + responding. The latter was evident across different operationalizations of exposure following the different theories. None of the theories tested showed clear explanatory superiority. Notably, a remarkably different pattern of increased responding to the CS-is reported in the literature for anxiety patients, suggesting that individuals exposed to childhood adversity may represent a specific sub-sample. We highlight that theories linking childhood adversity to (vulnerability to) psychopathology need refinement.

neuroscience↗

Expectation of mood improvement entails resource-dependent downregulation of negative inputs

BackgroundClinical trials of antidepressants show improvements in placebo groups of up to 80% compared to the real treatment arm. The mechanism underlying this clinically important effect has been linked to expectation induced goal-directed control. Here, we investigated how cognitive resources influence the effects of positive expectations on emotional processing. MethodsForty-nine healthy volunteers participated in a cross-over fMRI study, in which expectancy of positive emotional changes was induced by an alleged oxytocin nasal spray combined with verbal instruction. Participants performed a spatial cueing paradigm that manipulated the attention to emotional face distractors in the scanner and were characterized regarding their general ability to control attention. ResultsBehavioral findings showed placebo treatment to improve mood and to reduce distractibility by fearful over happy faces, specifically when more attentional resources were available to process faces. This aligned with neural changes in activation and functional coupling in lateral prefrontal-limbic networks indicating an expectation induced top-down regulation of aversive inputs. In addition, behavioral effects and prefrontal-parietal engagement directly correlated with trait ability to control attention. ConclusionsOur data show that placebo treatment combined with verbal instruction alone can improve mood and recruit top-down attentional selection. Changes in emotional processing critically depended on attentional context and individual control ability (i.e., contextual and general resources). These findings may be particularly relevant in patients with major depressive disorder, who often demonstrate a negativity bias and in whom placebo effects by verbal instructions alone may be limited due to reduced cognitive control capacity.

neuroscience↗

When Gaze-Pattern Similarity May Interfere With Future Memory

Human brains have a remarkable ability to separate streams of visual input into distinct memory-traces. It is unclear, however, how this ability relates to the way these inputs are explored via unique gaze-patterns. Moreover, it is yet unknown how motivation to forget or remember influences the gaze similarity and memory relationship. In two experiments, we therefore used a modified directed-forgetting paradigm and either showed blurred versions of the encoded scenes (Experiment 1) or pink noise images (Experiment 2) during attempted memory control. Both experiments demonstrated that higher levels of across-stimulus gaze similarity relate to worse future memory. Although this across-stimulus interference effect was unaffected by motivation, it depended on the perceptual overlap between stimuli and was more pronounced for different scene comparisons, than scene-pink noise comparisons. Intriguingly, these findings echo the pattern similarity effects from the neuroimaging literature and pinpoint a mechanism that could aid the regulation of unwanted memories.

neuroscience↗