Biology subjects

Furregoni, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Furregoni, G..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Temporal fingerprints of TMS-evoked potentials across thalamocortical circuits

BackgroundElectroencephalographic (EEG) potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) offer a direct window into cortical dynamics. Yet, a systematic exploration of their morphological features, analogous to sensory-evoked potentials, is lacking, especially for stimulation outside the motor cortex. AimTo obtain region-specific properties of frontal, parietal and occipital networks from the time course of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). Materials and MethodsWe implemented and applied an automatic procedure to compute peak-to-peak amplitude, peak latency, and inter-peak interval of TEPs recorded from 40 neurotypical subjects stimulated over left occipital (n=25), parietal (n=25), and frontal (n=25) cortices. ResultsOccipital TEPs showed the largest peak-to-peak amplitude and longest latency of the first waveform component, independently of stimulation intensity and consistent with the recruitment of a large patch of densely interconnected neurons. Concerning later components, both latency and inter-peak interval systematically decreased along the posterior-to-anterior axis, reflecting progressively faster recurrent dynamics from the alpha-dominated occipital circuitry to the tightly coupled loops between frontal cortex and subcortical structures. Parietal TEPs showed intermediate amplitude and latency measures, consistent with the heterogeneous cytoarchitectonic and connectional organization of the superior parietal cortex. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that TEP morphology is shaped by the distinct properties of the stimulated networks, with early amplitude reflecting the extent of local recruitment and later temporal features tracking the rhythm of recurrent activity. This work offers a mechanistically grounded and practically accessible approach, also released as a Python-based tool, that allows to characterize cortical reactivity across different brain-states and populations.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

The specific spatiotemporal evolution of TMS-evoked potentials reflects the engagement of cortical circuits

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) evokes electroencephalographic (EEG) responses that can persist for hundreds of milliseconds. While the first 80 ms after the pulse are widely accepted to reflect genuine cortical responses to TMS, later components have mainly been attributed to the effects of sensory co-stimulations. Here we reappraise this view by investigating the target-specificity of the spatiotemporal evolution of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). To this end, we compared TEPs elicited by targeting the premotor and primary motor cortices in 16 healthy subjects, under conditions designed to optimize TMS effectiveness on the cortex while minimizing peripheral confounds. As a counterfactual, we conducted the same comparison on the EEG responses evoked by realistic sham TMS and high-intensity somatosensory scalp stimulation. We found that EEG responses to motor and premotor TMS can exhibit distinct spatiotemporal evolutions, lasting up to 300 ms, both at the group and single-subject levels. These differences were absent or marginally detectable in both realistic sham TMS and high-intensity somatosensory scalp stimulation. Our findings suggest that, when effectiveness is optimized and peripheral confounds are controlled, TMS elicits specific long-lasting genuine EEG responses that reflect the initial engagement of specific cortical targets. These results challenge previous assumptions and highlight how TMS-EEG can be reliably used to assess large-scale properties within corticothalamic networks.

physiology↗

bioRxiv2025

Transcranial magnetic vs intracranial electric stimulation: a direct comparison of their effects via scalp EEG recordings

BackgroundSingle-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Intracranial Electrical Stimulation (IES) are widely used to probe cortical excitability and connectivity, but their electrophysiological effects have never been compared. ObjectiveThis study aims to fill this gap by using high-density scalp electroencephalogram (hd-EEG) as a common read-out to compare human brain responses to TMS and IES. MethodsThe dataset includes TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) acquired from healthy subjects (n=22) and IES-evoked potentials (IEPs) recorded from drug-resistant epileptic patients (n=31) during wakefulness. In a subset of subjects TEPs (n=12) and IEPs (n=13) were also recorded during NREM sleep. Amplitude, spectral, and spatiotemporal features of TMS and IES responses, as well as their estimated electrical fields, were compared. ResultsWe observed marked differences between TMS and IES responses. During wakefulness, IEPs are considerably larger, slower and associated with a suppression of cortical activity, whereas TEPs are characterized by multiple waves of recurrent activation. These differences are attenuated during NREM, during which both TMS and IES elicit large EEG responses associated with a prominent suppression of cortical activity. At the global level, the spatiotemporal complexity of the responses to both TMS and IES decreases consistently following the transition from wakefulness to NREM sleep. ConclusionDespite the limitations due to different subject populations (healthy vs pathological), our findings provide a first reference to parallel non-invasive and invasive brain stimulation and to interpret their differential effects. They also offer important insight on how cortical responsiveness is shaped by inhibition and adaptation mechanisms depending on input parameters and brain states. Highlights- IES evokes higher signal-to-noise EEG responses than TMS. - IES responses are larger, slower, and lead to cortical suppression. - TMS elicits faster recurrent waves, with no suppression during wakefulness. - Both TMS and IES converge to similar patterns during NREM sleep.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Thalamic feedback shapes brain responses evoked by cortical stimulation in mice and humans

Cortical stimulation with single pulses is a common technique in clinical practice and research. However, we still do not understand the extent to which it engages subcortical circuits which contribute to the associated evoked potentials (EPs). Here we find that cortical stimulation generates remarkably similar EPs in humans and mice, with a late component similarly modulated by the subjects behavioral state. We optogenetically dissect the underlying circuit in mice, demonstrating that the late component of these EPs is caused by a thalamic hyperpolarization and rebound. The magnitude of this late component correlates with the bursting frequency and synchronicity of thalamic neurons, modulated by the subjects behavioral state. A simulation of the thalamo-cortical circuit highlights that both intrinsic thalamic currents as well as cortical and thalamic GABAergic neurons contribute to this response profile. We conclude that the cortical stimulation engages cortico-thalamo-cortical circuits highly preserved across different species and stimulation modalities. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=140 SRC="FIGDIR/small/578243v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (38K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cae203org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bc5223org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b48e43org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e7fe34_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

neuroscience↗