bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Fuller, K. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Fuller, K. J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Plant structural and nutritional responses to drought differ among common pasture species

In the face of a changing climate, research indicates that more frequent and severe drought conditions are critical problems that will constrain production of high-quality forage and influence the performance of grazing animals in the future. In addition, the duration of drought and potential trade-offs between plant morphology and nutritional composition may influence plant drought adaptation strategies across pasture species, and the consequences for forage quality are not well understood. Here we present the results of a study investigating the effects of drought on biomass productivity, dead material, leaf:stem biomass allocation and nutritional composition (whole-plant and tissue-specific) across nine diverse pasture species. For this, we conducted a field experiment exposing species to a 6-month period of simulated severe drought (60% rainfall reduction during winter and spring) and samples were collected at multiple harvests. We found that drought had different, harvest-specific effects on plant biomass structure and nutritional composition among pasture species. The severity of drought impacts on productivity, but not on nutritional quality, increased with drought duration. In general, drought strongly reduced productivity, increased the percentage of dead material and had mixed effects (increases, decreases and no effect) on leaf:stem ratio and concentrations of crude protein, non-structural carbohydrates, neutral detergent fibre and lignin. Changes in plant-level nutritional quality were driven by simultaneous changes in both leaf and stem tissues for most, but not all, species. Our findings may be especially helpful for selection of adapted species/cultivars that could minimize potential drought risks on forage, thereby optimising pasture performance under future drought scenarios.

plant biology↗

Pastures and Climate Extremes: Impacts of warming and drought on the productivity and resilience of key pasture species in a field experiment

Shifts in the timing, intensity and/or frequency of climate extremes, such as severe drought and heatwaves, can generate sustained shifts in ecosystem function with important ecological and economic impacts for rangelands and managed pastures. The Pastures and Climate Extremes experiment (PACE) in Southeast Australia was designed to investigate the impacts of a severe winter/spring drought (60% rainfall reduction) and, for a subset of species, a factorial combination of drought and elevated temperature (ambient +3 {degrees}C) on pasture productivity. The experiment included nine common pasture and Australian rangeland species from three plant functional groups (C3 grasses, C4 grasses and legumes) planted in monoculture. Winter/spring drought resulted in productivity declines of 45% on average and up to 74% for the most affected species (Digitaria eriantha) during the 6-month treatment period, with eight of the nine species exhibiting significant yield reductions. Despite considerable variation in species sensitivity to drought, C4 grasses were more strongly affected by this treatment than C3 grasses or legumes. Warming also had negative effects on cool-season productivity, associated at least partially with exceedance of optimum growth temperatures in spring and indirect effects on soil water content. The combination of winter/spring drought and year-round warming resulted in the greatest yield reductions. We identified responses that were either additive such that there was only as significant warming effect under drought (Festuca), or less-than-additive, where there was no drought effect under warming (Medicago), compared to ambient plots. Results from this study highlight the sensitivity of diverse pasture species to increases in winter and spring drought severity similar to those predicted for this region, and that anticipated benefits of cool-season warming are unlikely to be realised. Overall, the substantial negative impacts on productivity suggest that future, warmer, drier climates will result in shortfalls in cool-season forage availability, with profound implications for the livestock industry and natural grazer communities.

ecology↗