bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Fukiage, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Fukiage, T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Psychophysical measurement of perceived motion flow of naturalistic scenes

The neural and computational mechanisms underlying visual motion perception have been extensively investigated over several decades, but most studies have used simple artificial stimuli such as random-dot kinematograms. Thus, it remains difficult to predict how human observers perceive optical flows in complex natural scenes. Here, we report a novel method to measure, psychophysically, optical flows perceived by human observers watching naturalistic movies, and to reveal the characteristics of human motion perception via comparison of the measured perceived flow to the ground truths and model predictions. We selected movie clips from the MPI Sintel Flow Dataset, which contains open-source computer graphics animations with ground truths. To measure the perceived vectors at a spatiotemporal point, we flashed a small dot during presentation of a brief clip and asked the observers to adjust the speed and direction of a matching random-noise stimulus, to reproduce the vector at the flashed point. The proposed method adequately estimated perceived flow, and the estimated perceived vector also indicated flow illusions, i.e., consistent deviations from the ground truths, in various ways, depending on the stimulus patterns. Comparisons with the predictions of biologically motivated models and machine vision algorithms indicated that some flow illusions were attributable to lower-level factors such as spatiotemporal pooling and signal loss, but others reflected higher-level computations including coordinate transformations that cannot be precisely predicted by existing flow estimation models. Psychophysical measurement of the optical flows that humans perceive in realistic environments constitutes a promising paradigm for advancing our understanding of visual motion perception. Significance StatementThe basic approach to studying human vision is to analyze relationships among subjective perceptual experiences, responses of neural mechanisms, and predictions of computational models. Recent technical advances have enabled researchers to access large-scale neuronal responses and model predictions for complex sensory inputs. The data on human visual perception, however, cannot be easily scaled up. Accurate measurement of rich visual experiences when viewing natural scenes remains challenging. We thus devised a novel psychophysical method to measure optical motion flows perceived by humans. We successfully visualized human-perceived flows of complex naturalistic movies and show, for the first time, ways in which human-perceived naturalistic flows agree with, and deviate from, the physical ground truths and the predictions of various visual motion models.

neuroscience↗

Do training with blurred images make convolutional neural networks closer to humans concerning object recognition performance and internal representations?

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWIt is suggested that experiences of perceiving blurry images in addition to sharp images contribute to the development of robust human visual processing. To computationally investigate the effect of exposure to blurry images, we trained Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) on ImageNet object recognition with a variety of combinations of sharp and blurry images. In agreement with related studies, mixed training on sharp and blurred images (B+S) makes the CNNs close to humans with respect to robust object recognition against a change in image blur. B+S training also reduces the texture bias of CNN in recognition of shape-texture-cue-conflict images, but the effect is not strong enough to achieve a strong shape bias comparable to what humans show. Other tests also suggest that B+S training is not sufficient to produce robust human-like object recognition based on global con-figurational features. We also show using representational similarity analysis and zero-shot transfer learning that B+S-Net does not acquire blur-robust object recognition through separate specialized sub-networks, each for sharp and blurry images, but through a single network analyzing common image features. However, blur training alone does not automatically create a mechanism like the human brain where subband information is integrated into a common representation. Our analyses suggest that experience with blurred images helps the human brain develop neural networks that robustly recognize the surrounding world, but it is not powerful enough to fill a large gap between humans and CNNs.

neuroscience↗