Fromel, R. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2024

Synthetic enhancers reveal design principles of cell state specific regulatory elements in hematopoiesis

During cellular differentiation, enhancers transform overlapping gradients of transcription factors (TFs) to highly specific gene expression patterns. However, the vast complexity of regulatory DNA impedes the identification of the underlying cis-regulatory rules. Here, we have characterized 62,126 fully synthetic DNA sequences to bottom-up dissect design principles of cell-state specific enhancers in the context of the differentiation of blood stem cells to seven myeloid lineages. Focusing on binding sites for 38 TFs and their pairwise interactions, we found that identical sites displayed both repressive and activating function, as a consequence of cellular context, site combinatorics, or simply predicted occupancy of a TF on an enhancer. Surprisingly, we found that combinations of activating sites frequently neutralized each other or even gained repressive function. These negative synergies convert quantitative imbalances in transcription factor expression into binary downstream activity patterns, a principle that can be exploited to build differentiation-state specific enhancers from scratch.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context

For decades, studies have noted that transcription factors (TFs) can behave as either activators or repressors of different target genes. More recently, evidence suggests TFs can act on transcription simultaneously in positive and negative ways. Here we use biophysical models of gene regulation to define, conceptualize and explore these two aspects of TF action: "duality", where TFs can be overall both activators and repressors at the level of the transcriptional response, and "coherent and incoherent" modes of regulation, where TFs act mechanistically on a given target gene either as an activator or a repressor (coherent) or as both (incoherent). For incoherent TFs, the overall response depends on three kinds of features: the TFs mechanistic effects, the dynamics and effects of additional regulatory molecules or the transcriptional machinery, and the occupancy of the TF on DNA. Therefore, activation or repression can be tuned by just the TF-DNA binding affinity, or the number of TF binding sites, given an otherwise fixed molecular context. Moreover, incoherent TFs can cause non-monotonic transcriptional responses, increasing over a certain concentration range and decreasing outside the range, and we clarify the relationship between non-monotonicity and common assumptions of gene regulation models. Using the mammalian SP1 as a case study and well controlled, synthetically designed target sequences, we find experimental evidence for incoherent action and activation, repression or non-monotonicity tuned by affinity. Our work highlights the importance of moving from a TF-centric view to a systems view when reasoning about transcriptional control.

biophysics↗