bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Freeman, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Freeman, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Appraising the causal relevance of DNA methylation for risk of lung cancer

DNA methylation changes in peripheral blood have been identified in relation to lung cancer risk. However, the causal nature of these associations remains to be fully elucidated. Meta-analysis of four epigenome-wide association studies (918 cases, 918 controls) revealed differential methylation at 16 CpG sites (FDR < 0.05) in relation to lung cancer risk. A two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis, using genetic instruments for methylation at 14 of the 16 CpG sites, and 29,863 cases and 55,586 controls from the TRICL-ILCCO lung cancer consortium, was performed to appraise the causal role of methylation at these sites on lung cancer. This approach provided little evidence that DNA methylation in peripheral blood at the 14 CpG sites play a causal role in lung cancer development, including for cg05575921 AHRR, where methylation is strongly associated with lung cancer risk. Further studies are needed to investigate the causal role played by DNA methylation in lung tissue.

epidemiology

Community-based benchmarking improves spike inference from two-photon calcium imaging data

In recent years, two-photon calcium imaging has become a standard tool to probe the function of neural circuits and to study computations in neuronal populations1, 2. However, the acquired signal is only an indirect measurement of neural activity due to the comparatively slow dynamics of fluorescent calcium indicators3. Different algorithms for estimating spike trains from noisy calcium measurements have been proposed in the past4-8, but it is an open question how far performance can be improved. Here, we report the results of the spikefinder challenge, launched to catalyze the development of new spike inference algorithms through crowd-sourcing. We present ten of the submitted algorithms which show improved performance compared to previously evaluated methods. Interestingly, the top-performing algorithms are based on a wide range of principles from deep neural networks to generative models, yet provide highly correlated estimates of the neural activity. The competition shows that benchmark challenges can drive algorithmic developments in neuroscience.

neuroscience