Freeman, B. G. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2018

Climate, habitat, and geographic range overlap drive plumage evolution

Organismal appearances are shaped by selection from both abiotic and biotic drivers 1-5. For example, Glogers rule describes the pervasive pattern that more pigmented populations are found in more humid areas 1,6,7, and substrate matching as a form of camouflage to reduce predation is widespread across the tree of life 8-10. Sexual selection is a potent driver of plumage elaboration 5,11, and species may also converge on nearly identical colours and patterns in sympatry, often to avoid predation by mimicking noxious species 3,4 To date, no study has taken an integrative approach to understand how these factors determine the evolution of colour and pattern across a large clade of organisms. Here we show that both habitat and climate profoundly shape avian plumage. However, we also find a strong signal that many species exhibit remarkable convergence not explained by these factors nor by shared ancestry. Instead, this convergence is associated with geographic overlap between species, suggesting strong, albeit occasional, selection for interspecific mimicry. Consequently, both abiotic and biotic factors, including interspecific interactions, are potent drivers of phenotypic evolution.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Fighting over food unites the birds of North America in a continental dominance hierarchy

The study of aggressive interactions between species has, to date, usually been restricted to interactions among small numbers of ecologically close competitors. Nothing is known about interspecific dominance hierarchies that include numerous, ecologically varied species. Such hierarchies are of interest because they could be used to address a variety of research questions, e.g. do similarly ranked species tend to avoid each other in time or space, and what will happen when such species come into contact as climates change? Here, we propose a method for creating a continental-scale hierarchy, and we make initial analyses based on this hierarchy. We quantified the extent to which a dominance hierarchy of feeder birds was linear, as intransitivities can promote local species coexistence. Using the existing network of citizen scientists participating in Project FeederWatch, we collected the data with which to create a continent-spanning interspecific dominance hierarchy that included species that do not currently have overlapping geographic distributions. Overall, the hierarchy was nearly linear, and largely predicted by body mass, although there were clade-specific deviations from the average mass-dominance relationship. Most of the small number of intransitive relationships in the hierarchy were based on small samples of observations. Few observations were made of interactions between close relatives and ecological competitors like Melanerpes woodpeckers and chickadees, as such species often have only marginally overlapping geographic distributions. Yet, these species ranks--emergent properties of the interaction network--were usually in agreement with published literature on dominance relationships between them. Interspecific dominance hierarchy, aggression, displacement, citizen science\n\nLAY SUMMARYWhen it comes to fighting over food, bigger is better but woodpeckers are best. The outcome of aggressive encounters between birds frequently determines which individual gains access to contested resources like food, but until now, little was known about such encounters between individuals of different species. We partnered with citizen scientists to record interspecific behavioral interactions at bird feeders around North America, and assembled these interactions into a continental dominance hierarchy.

ecology↗