bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Fraza, C. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Fraza, C. J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The Extremes of Normative Modelling

For many problems in neuroimaging, the most informative features occur in the tail of the distribution. For example, when considering psychiatric disorders as deviations from a norm, the tails of the distribution are considerably more informative than the bulk of the distribution for understanding risk, for stratifying and predicting such disorders and for anomaly detection. Yet, most statistical methods used in neuroimaging focus on modelling the bulk and fail to adequately capture extreme values occurring in the tails. To address this, we propose a framework that combines normative models with multivariate extreme value statistics to accurately model extreme deviations of a reference cohort for individual participants. Normative models are now widely used in clinical neuroscience and similar to the employment of normative growth charts in pediatric medicine to track a childs weight in relation to their age, normative models can be used with neuroimaging measurements to quantify individual neurophenotypic deviations from a reference cohort. However, formal statistical treatment of how to model the extreme deviations from these models has been lacking until now. In this article we provide such an approach, inspired by applications of extreme value statistics in meteorology. Since the presentation of extreme value statistics is usually quite technical, we begin with a non-technical introduction to the fundamental principles of extreme value statistics, to accurately map the tails of the normative distribution for biological markers, including mapping multivariate tail dependence across multiple markers. Next, we give a demonstration of this approach to the UK Biobank dataset and demonstrate how extreme values can be used to accurately estimate risk and detect atypicality. This framework provides a valuable tool for the statistical modelling of extreme deviations in neurobiological data, which could provide us with more accurate and effective diagnostic tools for neurological and psychiatric disorders.

neuroscience↗

Normative modeling of neuroimaging data using generalized additive models of location scale and shape

Normative modeling aims to quantify the degree to which an individuals brain deviates from a reference sample with respect to one or more variables, which can be used as a potential biomarker of a healthy brain and as a tool to study heterogeneity of psychiatric disorders. The application of normative models is hindered by methodological challenges and lacks standards for the usage and evaluation of normative models. In this paper, we present generalized additive models for location scale and shape (GAMLSS) for normative modeling of neuroimaging data, a flexible modeling framework that can model heteroskedasticity, non-linear effects of variables, and hierarchical structure of the data. It can model non-Gaussian distributions, and it allows for an automatic model order selection, thus improving the accuracy of normative models while mitigating problems of overfitting. Furthermore, we describe measures and diagnostic tools suitable for evaluating normative models and step-by-step examples of normative modeling, including fitting several candidate models, selecting the best models, and transferring them to new scan sites.

neuroscience↗