bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Franco-Perez, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Franco-Perez, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Differentiating unirradiated mice from those exposed to conventional or FLASH radiotherapy using MRI

Background and purposeThe FLASH effect expands the therapeutic ratio of tumor control to normal tissue toxicity observed after delivery of ultra-high (>100 Gy/s FLASH-RT) vs. conventional dose rate radiation (CONV-RT). In this first exploratory study, we assessed whether ex-vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) could reveal long-term differences after FLASH-RT and CONV-RT whole-brain irradiation. Materials and methodsFemale C57BL/6 mice were divided into three groups: control (non-irradiated), conventional (CONV-RT 0.1 Gy/s), and ultra-high dose rates (FLASH-RT 1 pulse, 5.5 x 106 Gy/s), and received 10 Gy of whole-brain irradiation in a single fraction at 10 weeks of age. Mice were evaluated by Novel Object Recognition cognitive testing at 10 months post-irradiation and were sampled at 13 months post-irradiation. Ex-vivo brains were imaged with a 14.1 Tesla/26 cm magnet with a multimodal MRI protocol, including T2-weighted TurboRare (T2W) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. ResultsIn accordance with previous results, cognitive tests indicated that animals receiving CONV-RT exhibited a decline in cognitive function, while FLASH-RT performed similarly to the controls. MRI showed decreased hippocampal mean intensity in the CONV-RT mice compared to controls but not in the FLASH-RT group. Comparing CONV-RT to control, we found significant changes in multiple whole-brain diffusion metrics, including the mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Mean Apparent Propagator (MAP) metrics. By contrast, no significant diffusion changes were found between the FLASH-RT and control groups. In an exploratory analysis compared to controls, regional diffusion metrics were primarily altered in the basal forebrain and the insular cortex after CONV-RT, and after FLASH-RT, a trend reduction was also observed. ConclusionThis study presents initial evidence that MRI can uncover clear changes in the brain after CONV-RT but not after FLASH-RT. The MRI results aligned with the observed cognitive protection after FLASH-RT, indicating the potential use of MRI to analyze the FLASH response.

neuroscience↗

Dosimetric and biologic intercomparison between electron and proton FLASH beams

Background and purposeThe FLASH effect has been validated in different preclinical experiments with electrons (eFLASH) and protons (pFLASH) operating at a mean dose rate above 40 Gy/s. However, no systematic intercomparison of the FLASH effect produced by e vs. pFLASH has yet been performed and constitutes the aim of the present study. Materials and methodsThe electron eRT6/Oriatron/CHUV/5.5 MeV and proton Gantry1/PSI/170 MeV were used to deliver conventional (0.1 Gy/s eCONV and pCONV) and FLASH ([≥]100 Gy/s eFLASH and pFLASH) irradiation. Protons were delivered in transmission. Dosimetric and biologic intercomparisons were performed with previously validated models. ResultsDoses measured at Gantry1 were in agreement ({+/-} 2.5%) with reference dosimeters calibrated at CHUV/IRA. The neurocognitive capacity of e and pFLASH irradiated mice was indistinguishable from the control while both e and pCONV irradiated cohorts showed cognitive decrements. Complete tumor response was obtained with the two beams and was similar between e and pFLASH vs. e and pCONV. Tumor rejection was similar indicating that T-cell memory response is beam-type and dose-rate independent. ConclusionDespite major differences in the temporal microstructure, this study shows that dosimetric standards can be established. The sparing of brain function and tumor control produced by the two beams were similar, suggesting that the most important physical parameter driving the FLASH effect is the overall time of exposure which should be in the range of hundreds of milliseconds for WBI in mice. In addition, we observed that immunological memory response is similar between electron and proton beams and is independent off the dose rate.

cancer biology↗