Biology subjects

Francis, N. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Francis, N. J..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

TDP-43 pathology triggers SRRM4-dependent cryptic splicing of G3BP1 in ALS/FTD

Loss of nuclear TDP-43 is a defining feature of the neurodegenerative diseases amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), yet how this leads to selective neuronal vulnerability is poorly understood. Here, using human iPSC-derived neurons and a large multi-omics dataset of ALS/FTD patients, we demonstrate that TDP-43 pathology induces the inclusion of an in-frame cryptic exon in human G3BP1. The resulting CRYPTIC G3BP1 protein contains an additional 10-amino acids within the highly conserved NTF2L domain, which acts as a dominant negative and disrupts stress granule dynamics. We further show that cryptic exon inclusion in G3BP1 upon TDP-43 loss is enriched in neurons. Mechanistically, the loss of TDP-43 unmasks a binding site for the neuron-specific splicing regulator SRRM4 within intron 2 of G3BP1, enabling the inclusion of the cryptic exon. Collectively, our findings reveal that neuron-specific regulatory mechanisms intersect with TDP-43 -mediated splicing and suggest a mechanistic basis for the increased neuronal vulnerability observed in ALS/FTD.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

A two-step mechanism for creating stable, condensed chromatin by the Polycomb complex PRC1

The Drosophila PRC1 complex regulates gene expression by modifying histone proteins and chromatin architecture. Two PRC1 subunits, PSC and Ph, are most implicated in chromatin architecture. In vitro, PRC1 compacts chromatin and inhibits transcription and nucleosome remodeling. The long disordered C-terminal region of PSC (PSC-CTR) is important for these activities, while Ph has little effect. In cells, Ph is important for condensate formation, long range chromatin interactions, and gene regulation, and its polymerizing Sterile alpha motif (SAM) is implicated in these activities. In vitro, truncated Ph containing the SAM and two other conserved domains (mini-Ph) undergoes phase separation with chromatin, suggesting a mechanism for SAM-dependent condensate formation in vivo. How the distinct activities of PSC and Ph on chromatin function together in PRC1 is not known. To address this question, we analyzed structures formed with large chromatin templates and PRC1 in vitro. PRC1 bridges chromatin into extensive fibrillar networks. Ph, its SAM, and SAM polymerization activity have little effect on these structures. Instead, the PSC-CTR controls their growth, and is sufficient for their formation. To understand how phase separation driven by Ph SAM intersects with the chromatin bridging activity of the PSC-CTR, we used mini-Ph to form condensates with chromatin and then challenged them with PRC1 lacking Ph (PRC1{Delta}Ph). PRC1{Delta}Ph converts mini-Ph chromatin condensates into clusters of small non-fusing condensates and bridged fibers. These condensates retain a high level of chromatin compaction and do not intermix. Thus, phase separation of chromatin by mini-Ph, followed by the action of the PSC-CTR creates a unique chromatin organization with regions of high nucleosome density and extraordinary stability. We discuss how this coordinated sequential activity of two proteins found in the same complex may occur and the possible implications of stable chromatin architectures in maintaining transcription states.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2021

Intrinsically disordered sequences in the Polycomb protein Polyhomeotic regulate condensate formation

The Polycomb group (PcG) complex PRC1 localizes in the nucleus in the form of condensed structures called Polycomb bodies. The PRC1 subunit Polyhomeotic (Ph) contains an oligomerizing sterile alpha motif (SAM) that is implicated in both PcG body formation and chromatin organization in Drosophila and mammalian cells. A truncated version of Ph containing the SAM (mini-Ph), forms phase separated condensates with DNA or chromatin in vitro, suggesting PcG bodies may form by SAM-driven phase separation. In cells, Ph forms multiple small condensates, while mini-Ph typically forms a single large nuclear condensate. We therefore hypothesize that sequences outside of mini-Ph, which are predicted to be intrinsically disordered, are required for proper condensate formation. We identified three distinct low complexity regions in Ph based on sequence composition. We systematically tested the role of each of these sequences in Ph condensates using live imaging of transfected Drosophila S2 cells. Each sequence uniquely affects Ph SAM-dependent condensate size, number, and morphology, but the most dramatic effects occur when the central, glutamine rich IDR is removed, which results in large Ph condensates. Like mini-Ph condensates, these condensates exclude chromatin. Chromatin fractionation experiments indicate that removal of the glutamine rich IDR reduces chromatin binding, while removal of either of the other IDRs increases chromatin binding. Our data suggest all three IDRs, and functional interactions among them, regulate Ph condensate size and number. Our results can be explained by a model in which tight chromatin binding by Ph IDRs antagonizes Ph SAM driven phase separation and highlight the complexity of regulation of biological condensates housed in single proteins.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2020

High throughput screening identifies SOX2 as a Super Pioneer Factor that inhibits DNA methylation maintenance at its binding sites

Access of mammalian transcription factors (TFs) to regulatory regions, an essential event for transcription regulation, is hindered by chromatin compaction involving nucleosome wrapping, repressive histone modifications and DNA methylation. Moreover, methylation of TF binding sites (TBSs) affects TF binding affinity to these sites. Remarkably, a special class of TFs called pioneer transcription factors (PFs) can access nucleosomal DNA, leading to nucleosome remodelling and chromatin opening. However, whether PFs can bind to methylated sites and induce DNA demethylation is largely unknown. Here, we set up a highly parallelized approach to investigate PF ability to bind methylated DNA and induce demethylation. Our results indicate that the interdependence between DNA methylation and TF binding is more complex than previously thought, even within a select group of TFs that have a strong pioneering activity; while most PFs do not induce changes in DNA methylation at their binding sites, we identified PFs that can protect DNA from methylation and PFs that can induce DNA demethylation at methylated binding sites. We called the latter "super pioneer transcription factors" (SPFs), as they are seemingly able to overcome several types of repressive epigenetic marks. Importantly, while most SPFs induce TET-dependent active DNA demethylation, SOX2 binding leads to passive demethylation by inhibition of the maintenance methyltransferase DNMT1 during replication. This important finding suggests a novel mechanism allowing TFs to interfere with the epigenetic memory during DNA replication.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

RNA strand invasion activity of the Polycomb complex PRC2

Epigenetic regulation is conveyed through information encoded by specific chromatin features. Non-canonical nucleic acid structures could in principle also convey biological information but their role(s) in epigenetic regulation is not known. Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins form memory of transient transcriptional repression events that is necessary for development. In Drosophila, PcG proteins are recruited to specific DNA sequences, Polycomb Response Elements (PREs). PREs are switchable memory elements that can exist in repressed, active, or unengaged states 1,2. How PcG activities are targeted to PREs to maintain repressed states only in appropriate developmental contexts has been difficult to elucidate. Biochemically, PcG protein complexes modify chromatin to maintain gene repression 1,3,4. However, PcG proteins also interact with both RNA and DNA, and RNA is implicated in the targeting of PcG function. We find that R-loops, three-stranded nucleic acid structures formed when an RNA hybridizes to its complementary DNA and displaces the other DNA strand 5, form at many PREs in Drosophila embryos, and correlate with the repressive state. R-loops are recognized by the PcG complex PRC1 in vitro. Unexpectedly, we find that the PcG complex PRC2 has RNA strand invasion activity, which can drive formation of RNA-DNA hybrids, the key component of R-loops. Our results suggest a new mechanism for targeting PcG function through R-loop formation by PRC2 and recognition by PRC1. More generally, our findings suggest formation and recognition 6 of non-canonical nucleic acid structures as an epigenetic mechanism.

biochemistry↗