bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

France, L. A.

Publications and source records attributed to France, L. A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Hawks pursuing targets through clutter avoid obstacles by applying open loop steering corrections during closed loop pursuit

Collision avoidance [1-4] and target pursuit [5-8] are challenging flight behaviors for any animal or autonomous vehicle, but their interaction is even more so [9-11]. For predators adapted to hunting in clutter, the demands of these two tasks may conflict, requiring effective reconciliation to avoid a hazardous collision or loss of target. Technical approaches to obstacle avoidance rely mainly on path-planning algorithms [12], but these are unlikely to be effective during closed-loop pursuit of a maneuvering target, so collision avoidance must instead be implemented reactively during prey pursuit. For example, the pursuit-avoidance behavior of predatory flies has been successfully modelled by combining feedback on target motion with feedback on obstacle looming [13]. It is unclear, however, whether this mechanism will generalize to complex environments with many looming obstacles, and it remains unknown how aerial predators reconcile the conflict between obstacle avoidance and prey pursuit in clutter. Here we use high-speed motion capture data to show how Harris hawks Parabuteo unicinctus avoid collisions by making open-loop steering corrections during closed-loop pursuit. We find that hawks combine continuous feedback on target motion with a discrete feedforward steering correction aimed at clearing an upcoming obstacle as closely as possible at maximum span. By biasing the hawks flight direction, this guidance law provides an effective means of prioritizing obstacle avoidance whilst remaining locked-on to the target. We anticipate that a similar mechanism may be used in terrestrial and aquatic pursuit. The same biased guidance law could be used for obstacle avoidance in drones designed to intercept other drones in clutter, or in drones using closed-loop guidance to navigate between fixed waypoints in urban environments.

zoology↗

Visual versus visual-inertial guidance in hawks pursuing terrestrial targets

The flight behaviour of predatory birds is well modelled by a guidance law called proportional navigation, which commands steering in proportion to the angular rate of the line-of-sight from predator to prey. The line-of-sight rate is defined with respect to an inertial frame of reference, so proportional navigation is necessarily implemented using visual-inertial sensor fusion. In Harris hawks, pursuit of terrestrial targets may be even better modelled by assuming that visual-inertial information on the line-of-sight rate is combined with visual information on the deviation angle between the attackers velocity and the line-of-sight. Here we ask whether a new variant of this mixed guidance law can model Harris hawk pursuit behaviour successfully using visual information alone. We use high-speed motion capture to record n=228 attack fights from N=4 Harris hawks, and confirm that proportional navigation and mixed guidance using visual-inertial information both model the trajectory data well. Moreover, the mixed guidance law still models the data closely if visual-inertial information on the line-of-sight rate is replaced with purely visual information on the apparent motion of the target relative to the background. Although the original form of the mixed guidance law provides the closest fit, all three models provide an adequate phenomenological model of the behavioural data, whilst each making different predictions on the physiological pathways involved.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Optimisation of unsteady flight in learned avian perching manoeuvres

Perching at speed is amongst the most challenging flight behaviours that birds perform1,2, and beyond the capability of current autonomous vehicles. Smaller birds may touchdown by hovering3-8, but larger birds typically swoop upward to perch1,2 - presumably because the adverse scaling of their power margin prohibits slow flapping flight9, and because swooping transfers excess kinetic to potential energy1,2,10. Perching is risky in larger birds6,11, demanding precise control of velocity and pose12-15, but it is unknown how they optimize this challenging manoeuvre. More generally, whereas cruising flight behaviours such as migration and commuting are adapted to minimize cost-of-transport or time-of-flight16, the optimization of unsteady flight manoeuvres remains largely unexplored7,17. Here we show that swooping minimizes neither the time nor energy required to perch safely in Harris hawks Parabuteo unicinctus, but instead minimizes the distance flown under hazardous post-stall conditions. By combining motion capture data from 1,563 flights with flight dynamics modelling, we found that the birds choice of where to transition from powered dive to unpowered climb minimizes the distance from the landing perch over which very high lift coefficients are required. Time and energy are therefore invested to maintain the control authority needed to execute a safe landing, rather than being minimized continuously as in technical applications of autonomous perching under nonlinear feedback control13 and deep reinforcement learning18,19. Naive birds learn this behaviour on-the-fly, so our findings suggest an alternative reward function for reinforcement learning of autonomous perching in air vehicles.

animal behavior and cognition↗