Biology subjects

Fraessle, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Fraessle, S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Perceived Control Over Breathing Perturbations Depends on Interosensory Input and Prediction Error

Interoception and homeostatic/allostatic control are not only fundamental for survival but play a key role for maintaining somatic and mental health. Furthermore, metacognitive evaluations of these processes, such as perceived failure of allostatic regulation, have been proposed to underlie the experience of chronic symptoms, such as chronic fatigue. A central question in this regard is what mechanisms the brain uses to evaluate control over bodily states. A prominent computational proposal posits that this is achieved by monitoring of interoceptive prediction errors (PEs). However, to date, this proposal has not been tested experimentally. Here, we tested this hypothesis by applying computational process models of perceived control to data from a novel behavioural paradigm, the Respiratory Metacognition of Control Task (RMCT). The RMCT manipulates control over breathing by changing inspiratory resistive loads as a function of control achieved in a gamified prediction task. We developed and compared trial-by-trial generative models of perceived explicit control in the RMCT, using data from 50 volunteers in a pre-registered analysis. Bayesian model selection suggested that perceived control over breathing is best explained as a function of both trial-wise interoceptive outcomes (breathing with or without an inspiratory resistive load) and trial-wise PEs about respiratory resistance. These results support a longstanding computational proposal of how the brain detects failures of bodily regulation and provide a mechanistic model for understanding inter-individual differences in perceived control over bodily states.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

Bi-cross-validation: a data-driven method to evaluate dynamic functional connectivity models in fMRI

Dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) models have become increasingly popular over the past decade for characterising time-varying interactions between brain regions. However, assessing and comparing dFC models remains challenging. Here, we introduce bi-cross-validation as a general framework for evaluating dFC models and selecting key hyperparameters, such as the number of states. By jointly partitioning the data across subjects and brain regions, bi-cross-validation enables out-of-sample evaluation without re-estimating latent states on the same data used for testing, thereby avoiding circularity. Using simulated data with known ground-truth dynamics, we show that bi-cross-validation favours models that accurately capture the underlying state structure. Applying the framework to real resting-state fMRI data, we demonstrate that bi-cross-validation naturally balances goodness-of-fit against model complexity, with performance improving and then declining as model complexity increases. Finally, we use bi-cross-validation to directly compare static and dynamic FC models, showing that dynamic models underperform static models at low spatial dimensionality, but outperform static models at sufficiently high dimensionality. Together, these results establish bi-cross-validation as a principled tool for dFC model selection, evaluation, and comparison.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Bayesian Workflow for Generative Modeling in Computational Psychiatry

Computational (generative) modelling of behaviour has considerable potential for clinical applications. In order to unlock the potential of generative models, reliable statistical inference is crucial. For this, Bayesian workflow has been suggested which, however, has rarely been applied in Translational Neuromodeling and Computational Psychiatry (TN/CP) so far. Here, we present a worked example of Bayesian workflow in the context of a typical application scenario for TN/CP. This application example uses Hierarchical Gaussian Filter (HGF) models, a family of computational models for hierarchical Bayesian belief updating. When equipped with a suitable response model, HGF models can be fit to behavioural data from cognitive tasks; these data frequently consist of binary responses and are typically univariate. This poses challenges for statistical inference due to the limited information contained in such data. We present a novel set of response models that allow for simultaneous inference from multivariate (here: two) behavioural data types. Using both simulations and empirical data from a speed-incentivised associative reward learning (SPIRL) task, we show that harnessing information from two different data streams (binary responses and continuous response times) improves the accuracy of inference (specifically, identifiability of parameters and models). Moreover, we find a linear relationship between log-transformed response times in the SPIRL task and participants uncertainty about the outcome. Our analysis illustrates the benefits of Bayesian workflow for a typical use case in TN/CP. We argue that adopting Bayesian workflow for generative modelling helps increase the transparency and robustness of results, which in turn is of fundamental importance for the long-term success of TN/CP.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Thermodynamic integration for dynamic causal models

In generative modeling of neuroimaging data, such as dynamic causal modeling (DCM), one typically considers several alternative models, either to determine the most plausible explanation for observed data (Bayesian model selection) or to account for model uncertainty (Bayesian model averaging). Both procedures rest on estimates of the model evidence, a principled trade-off between model accuracy and complexity. In DCM, the log evidence is usually approximated using variational Bayes (VB) under the Laplace approximation (VBL). Although this approach is highly efficient, it makes distributional assumptions and can be vulnerable to local extrema. An alternative to VBL is Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, which is asymptotically exact but orders of magnitude slower than VB. This has so far prevented its routine use for DCM.\n\nThis paper makes four contributions. First, we introduce a powerful MCMC scheme - thermodynamic integration (TI) - to neuroimaging and present a derivation that establishes a theoretical link to VB. Second, this derivation is based on a tutorial-like introduction to concepts of free energy in physics and statistics. Third, we present an implementation of TI for DCM that rests on population MCMC. Fourth, using simulations and empirical functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, we compare log evidence estimates obtained by TI, VBL, and other MCMC-based estimators (prior arithmetic mean and posterior harmonic mean). We find that model comparison based on VBL gives reliable results in most cases, justifying its use in standard DCM for fMRI. Furthermore, we demonstrate that for complex and/or nonlinear models, TI may provide more robust estimates of the log evidence. Importantly, accurate estimates of the model evidence can be obtained with TI in acceptable computation time. This paves the way for using DCM in scenarios where the robustness of single-subject inference and model selection becomes paramount, such as differential diagnosis in clinical applications.

neuroscience↗