Biology subjects

Frach, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Frach, L..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

(Epi-)Genomic Data in the German TwinLife Study: TwinSNPs and TECS Cohort Profiles

The German Twin Family Panel TwinLife is a nationwide longitudinal study of twins and their family members. Primarily focusing on the development of social inequalities over the life course, TwinLife has been collecting data since October 2014 starting with 4,096 twin families (Ntotal = 16,951 individuals). As Germanys largest twin study to date, TwinLife has been surveying four birth cohorts of monozygotic and dizygotic same-sex twin pairs (initially [~]5, 11, 17, and 23 years old) and their families for 11 years. Survey data have been collected through five biennial face-to-face interviews with four computer-assisted telephone interviews in the years between. In addition, saliva samples were collected before the COVID-19 pandemic (2018-2020), during the pandemic (2021), and after (2022-2024). In this Cohort Profile, we describe the curation and initial analyses of molecular genetic and epigenetic data from the two TwinLife satellite projects TwinSNPs and TECS. Together, these projects currently comprise 12,108 processed DNA samples from 6,450 participants, extracted from the first two saliva collections before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We compared the subsamples with the overall TwinLife sample and provide an overview of derived polygenic scores (PGS), epigenetic clocks and other methylation profile scores (MPS). We found that PGS predicted sample attrition in TwinLife, with small but significant associations between higher PGS for educational attainment and continued participation. Epigenetic clocks derived from saliva were highly correlated with chronological age (r = .71 to r = .94) and were generally more stable over time than other MPS. PGS for epigenetic clocks were associated with the respective clock only during but not before the start of the pandemic. We discuss opportunities of combining prospectively assessed molecular (epi)genetic data in within-family designs such as TwinLife and its implications and avenues for future research.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2022

The DNA methylation landscape of the human oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR): Recommendations for future research

The oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is of interest when investigating the effects of early adversity on DNA methylation. However, there is heterogeneity regarding the selection of the most promising CpG sites to target for analyses. The goal of this study was to determine functionally relevant clusters of CpG sites within the OXTR CpG island in 113 mother-infant dyads, with 58 of the mothers having experienced childhood maltreatment (CM). OXTR DNA methylation and gene expression was analyzed in peripheral/umbilical blood mononuclear cells. Different complexity reduction approaches were used to reduce the 188 CpG sites into clusters of co-methylated sites. Furthermore, associations between OXTR DNA methylation (cluster- and site-specific level) and OXTR gene expression and CM were investigated. Results showed that, first, CpG sections differed strongly regarding their statistical utility for research of individual differences in DNA methylation. Second, cluster analyses and Partial Least Squares (PLS) suggested two clusters consisting of intron1/exon2 and the protein-coding region of exon 3, respectively, as most strongly associated with outcome measures. Third, cross-validated PLS regression explained 7% of variance in CM, with low cross-validated variance explained for the prediction of gene expression. Fourth, very high mother-child correspondence was observed in correlation patterns within the identified clusters, but only modest correspondence outside these clusters. This study characterized the DNA methylation landscape of the OXTR CpG island by highlighting clusters of CpG sites that show desirable statistical properties and predictive value. We provide a Companion Web Application to guide future studies in their choice of CpG sites.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Targeted bisulfite sequencing: A novel tool for the assessment of DNA methylation with high sensitivity and increased coverage

DNA methylation analysis is increasingly used in stress research. Available methods are expensive, laborious and often limited by either the analysis of short CpG stretches or low assay sensitivity. Here, we present a cost-efficient next generation sequencing-based strategy for the simultaneous investigation of multiple candidate genes in large cohorts. To illustrate the method, we present analysis of four candidate genes commonly assessed in psychoneuroendocrine research: Glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1), Serotonin transporter (SLC6A4), FKBP Prolyl isomerase 5 (FKBP5), and the Oxytocin receptor (OXTR). DNA methylation standards and DNA of a female and male donor were bisulfite treated in three independent trials and were used to generate sequencing libraries for 42 CpGs from the NR3C1 1F promoter region, 83 CpGs of the SLC6A4 5 regulatory region, 5 CpGs located in FKBP5 intron 7, and additional 12 CpGs located in a potential enhancer element in intron 3 of the OXTR. In addition, DNA of 45 patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and 45 healthy controls was assayed. Multiplex libraries of all samples were sequenced on a MiSeq system and analyzed for mean methylation values of all CpG sites using amplikyzer2 software. Results indicated excellent accuracy of the assays when investigating replicates generated from the same bisulfite converted DNA, and very high linearity (R2> 0.9) of the assays shown by the analysis of differentially methylated DNA standards. Comparing DNA methylation between BPD and healthy controls revealed no biologically relevant differences. The technical approach as described here facilitates targeted DNA methylation analysis and represents a highly sensitive, cost-efficient and high throughput tool to close the gap between coverage and precision in epigenetic research of stress-associated phenotypes.

neuroscience↗