bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Forsberg, S. K. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Forsberg, S. K. G..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Longitudinal sequencing reveals polygenic andepistatic nature of genomic response to selection

Evolutionary adaptation to new environments likely results from a combination of selective sweeps and polygenic shifts, depending on the genetic architecture of traits under selection. While selective sweeps have been widely studied, polygenic responses are considered more prevalent but challenging to quantify. The infinitesimal model makes explicit the hypothesis about the dynamics of changes in allele frequencies under selection, where only allelic effect sizes, frequencies, linkage, and gametic disequilibrium matter. Departures from this, like long-range correlations of allele frequency changes, could be a signal of epistasis in polygenic response. We performed an Evolve & Resequence experiment in Drosophila melanogaster exposing flies to a high-sugar diet as a source of environmental stress for over 100 generations. We tracked allele frequency changes in >3000 individually sequenced flies as well as population pools and searched for loci under selection by identifying sites with allele frequency trajectories that differentiated selection regimes consistently across replicates. We estimate that at least 4% of the genome was under positive selection, the result of a highly polygenic response. Most of this response was seen as small but consistent allele frequency changes over time, and there were only a few large allele-frequency changes (selective sweeps). We then searched for signatures of selection on pairwise combinations of alleles in the new environment and found several strong signals of putative epistatic interactions across unlinked loci that were consistent across selected populations. Finally, we measured differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across treatments and show that DEGs are enriched for selected SNPs, suggesting a regulatory basis for the selective response. Our results suggest that epistatic contributions to polygenic selective response are common and lead to detectable signatures.

evolutionary biology↗

When the microbiome defines the host phenotype: selection on vertical transmission in varying environments

The microbiome can contribute to variation in fitness-related traits of their hosts, and thus to host evolution. Hosts are therefore expected to be under selection to control their microbiome, for instance through controlling microbe transmission from parents to offspring. Current models have mostly focused on microbes that either increase or decrease fitness. In that case, host-level selection is relatively straightforward, favouring either complete or no inheritance. In natural systems, however, vertical transmission fidelity varies widely, and microbiome composition is often shaped by a combination of vertical and horizontal transmission modes. We propose that such mixed transmission could optimize host fitness under fluctuating environments. Using a general model, we illustrate that decreasing vertical transmission fidelity increases the amount of microbiome variation, and thus potentially phenotypic variation, across hosts. Whether or not this is advantageous depends on environmental conditions, how much the microbiome changes during host development, and the contribution of other factors to trait variation. We discuss how environmentally-dependent microbial effects can favor intermediate transmission, review examples from natural systems, and suggest research avenues to empirically test our predictions. Overall, we show that imperfect transmission may be adaptive by allowing individuals to ensure phenotypic variability in their offspring in contexts where varying environments mean that this strategy increases long-term fitness.

evolutionary biology↗

On The Relationship Between Epistasis And Genetic Variance-Heterogeneity

Epistasis and genetic variance heterogeneity are two non-additive genetic inheritance patterns that are often, but not always, related. Here we use theoretical examples and empirical results from analyses of experimental data to illustrate the connection between the two. This includes an introduction to the relationship between epistatic gene-action, statistical epistasis and genetic variance heterogeneity and a brief discussion about how other genetic processes than epistasis can also give rise to genetic variance heterogeneity.\n\nHighlightGenetic effects on the trait variance, rather than the mean, have been found in several studies. Here we discuss how this sometimes, but not always, can be caused by epistasis.

genetics↗