bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Fornara, J. H.

Publications and source records attributed to Fornara, J. H..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Predator type and relative risk affects the repeatability of nest defense in a songbird

Interindividual differences in nest defense towards a single predator type have been shown to be repeatable in multiple species, supporting the presence of personality. Here, we assessed if the nest defense of female northern house wrens (Troglodytes aedon) was repeatable across different types of predators, which is predicted by personality and largely untested. Over three years, we placed a decoy of a common nest predator, the eastern rat snake (Pantherophis alleghaniensis), on top of nest boxes and measured female behavior. Each season, we also presented a second stimulus of varying threat level, including an eastern chipmunk decoy (Tamias striatus), a taxidermied Coopers hawk (Accipiter cooperii), and a novel object of unknown threat. We measured repeatability between each pair of threats and compared the population-level response to the snake across years. Nest defense was significantly repeatable between the snake and chipmunk, which presented similar risks. It was also repeatable between the snake and novel object despite the population-level response to the object being significantly weaker. In contrast, nest defense was not repeatable between the snake and the hawk, which posed a significant threat to adult survival that may have disrupted the consistency of the female response. Finally, the average, population-level response to the snake did not detectably differ among years, indicating stability in this behavior despite high turnover in breeding adults. These results suggest the presence of personality in nest defense, but more research is needed to evaluate the effect of high-risk predators on the repeatability of this behavior. Significance StatementDifferences among individuals in the strength of nest defense are often repeatable towards a specific predator, indicating the presence of personality. However, few studies have tested the repeatability of nest defense across different predators of varying threat levels. Personality predicts that weak/strong responders to one predator should also be weak/strong to another. We tested this prediction in female northern house wrens by placing decoys of different predators and a novel object on top of their nest boxes to measure nest defense. Nest defense was repeatable between two predators of similar risk and between a predator and a novel object of unknown risk. However, nest defense was not repeatable between a low and high-risk predator. The results suggest the presence of personality, but research is needed on the effects of high-risk predators that appear to disrupt behavioral consistency.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Risk assessment during nest defense against three simulated predators by female northern house wrens (Troglodytes aedon aedon)

Offspring predation is one of the greatest obstacles to an organisms reproductive success, but parents vary in the strength of their response to potential predators. One explanation for this variable investment is that defending current offspring has the potential to lower future reproductive success if the predator is also capable of injuring or killing the parent. Northern house wrens (Troglodytes aedon) are cavity-nesting songbirds that defend against multiple species of nest predators including small mammals, birds of prey, and snakes. Here, we used three different predator decoys: two nest predators - an eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus) and an eastern ratsnake (Pantherophis alleghaniensis) - as well as a predator of both offspring and adults - a juvenile Coopers hawk (Accipiter cooperi) - to elicit nest defense and test whether females use risk assessment to modulate their antipredator behavior. We found that antipredator behaviors were not significantly different between the two nest predators, which posed a high risk to the nestlings, but lower risk to the parents as neither species frequently captures adult wrens outside the nest box. However, female wrens never dove at or attacked the Coopers hawk while they frequently attacked both the snake and chipmunk decoys. Neighboring house wrens from adjacent territories were also less likely to respond to the hawk, but more heterospecifics mobbed the hawk than the snake decoy. Collectively, these results show that risk assessment and the strength of the antipredator response varies substantially both within and among species. Female house wrens exhibit plasticity in their nest defense behavior, and they respond to different types of predators in a way that could maximize lifetime fitness while risking the loss of their current offspring.

evolutionary biology↗