bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Forano, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Forano, E..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Oral-stomach sampling to replace rumen-fistulated animals in ruminant nutrition research - a case study

Studies using fistulated ruminants have shed light on digestion and fermentation in the rumen and yielded tools to determine the feed efficiency of diets, limit effluents or anticipate variability in the quality of animal products. However, the ethical acceptability of such studies has been called into question. Our objective was to determine whether oral-stomach sampling (OSS) is an acceptable alternative to sampling through a ruminal cannula in characterizing the variability of rumen fluid composition induced by an acidogenic dietary challenge in dairy cows. During three four-week periods (P1, P2, P3), six rumen-fistulated cows were fed a standard diet based on supplemented corn silage (periods 1 and 3) alternating with a diet enriched with starch (period 2). Rumen juice was collected through cannulas at three locations in the rumen (reticulum, ventral sac or a mix of both) and by OSS, once per week at 0830 h, i.e. before morning feeding, and once every third week of each period at 1330 h, i.e. 4.5 hours after morning feeding. Whatever the sampling method or location, ruminal pH was lower in period 2 compared to periods 1 and 3 at 1330 h (6.21 vs. 5.57 vs. 6.12 in periods 1, 2 and 3). Ruminal pH was higher when obtained by OSS rather than cannulation, whatever the sampling location (on average, +0.44 points at 0830 h and +0.56 points at 1330 h). Mineral composition indicated a presumed dilution by saliva of OSS samples. This was also consistent with lower concentrations of volatile fatty acids. The next steps will be to analyze the associated variations in in vitro rumen fermentation parameters and microbiota composition. ImplicationsThe use of fistulated ruminants to elucidate ruminal physiology is currently controversial in society. In order to minimise, reduce or replace these experimental models, alternatives to ruminal fistula sampling are being evaluated. Here we focus on oral stomach sampling (OSS). We show that OSS can be a satisfactory alternative to cannula sampling in the evaluation of rumen fermentation parameters, especially for the molar proportion of volatile fatty acids, rumen pH, and rumen volatile fatty acid and ammonia concentrations. We also show that OSS must be standardized to avoid salivary contamination affecting the quality of the results.

physiology↗

Dynamic genome-based metabolic modeling of the predominant cellulolytic rumen bacterium Fibrobacter succinogenes S85

Fibrobacter succinogenes is a cellulolytic predominant bacterium that plays an essential role in the degradation of plant fibers in the rumen ecosystem. It converts cellulose polymers into intracellular glycogen and the fermentation metabolites succinate, acetate, and formate. We developed dynamic models of F. succinogenes S85 metabolism on glucose, cellobiose, and cellulose on the basis of a network reconstruction done with the Automatic Reconstruction of metabolic models (AuReMe) workspace. The reconstruction was based on genome annotation, 5 templates-based orthology methods, gap-filling and manual curation. The metabolic network of F. succinogenes S85 comprises 1565 reactions with 77% linked to 1317 genes, 1586 unique metabolites and 931 pathways. The network was reduced using the NetRed algorithm and analyzed for computation of Elementary Flux Modes (EFMs). A yield analysis was further performed to select a minimal set of macroscopic reactions for each substrate. The accuracy of the models was acceptable in simulating F. succinogenes carbohydrate metabolism with an average coefficient of variation of the Root mean squared error of 19%. Resulting models are useful resources for investigating the metabolic capabilities of F. succinogenes S85, including the dynamics of metabolite production. Such an approach is a key step towards the integration of omics microbial information into predictive models of the rumen metabolism.

systems biology↗

A live yeast supplementation to gestating ewes improves bioactive molecules composition in colostrum with no impact on its bacterial composition and beneficially affects immune status of the offspring

Colostrum quality is of paramount importance in the management of optimal ruminant growth and infectious disease prevention in early life. Live yeast supplementation effect during the last month of gestation was evaluated on ewes colostrum composition. Two groups of ewes (n=14) carrying twin lambs were constituted and twins were separated into groups (mothered or artificially-fed) 12h after birth. Nutrient, oligosaccharides (OS), IgG and lactoferrin concentrations were measured over 72h after lambing, and bacterial community was described in colostrum collected at parturition (T0). Immune passive transfer was evaluated through IgG measurement in lamb serum. In both groups, colostral nutrient, OS concentrations and IgG concentrations in colostrum and lamb serum decreased over time, (p < 0.01) except for lactose, which slightly increased (p < 0.001) and lactoferrin which remained stable. Bacterial population was stable over time with high relative abundances of Aerococcaceae, Corynebacteriaceae, Moraxellaceae and Staphylococcaceae in T0-colostrum. No effect of supplementation was observed in nutrient and lactoferrin concentrations. In supplemented ewes, colostral IgG level was higher at T0 and a higher level of serum IgG was observed in lambs born from supplemented mothers and artificially-fed, while no effect of supplementation was observed in the mothered lambs groups. Using a metabolomic approach, we showed that supplementation affected OS composition with significantly higher levels of colostral Neu-5Gc compounds up to 5h after birth. No effect of supplementation was observed on bacterial composition. Our data suggest that live yeast supplementation offsets the negative impact of early separation and incomplete colostrum feeding in neonate lambs. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=135 SRC="FIGDIR/small/464371v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (22K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8c4e5borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16c6cf6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1658d42org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cf0fa_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

physiology↗