bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Foo, C.-S.

Publications and source records attributed to Foo, C.-S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Neural network modeling of differential binding between wild-type and mutant CTCF reveals putative binding preferences for zinc fingers 1-2

BackgroundMany transcription factors (TFs), such as multi zinc-finger (ZF) TFs, have multiple DNA binding domains (DBDs) with multiple components, and deciphering the DNA binding motifs of individual components is a major challenge. One example of such a TF is CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF), a TF with eleven ZFs that plays a variety of roles in transcriptional regulation, most notably anchoring DNA loops. Previous studies found that CTCF zinc fingers (ZFs) 3-7 bind CTCFs core motif and ZFs 9-11 bind a specific upstream motif, but the motifs of ZFs 1-2 have yet to be identified. ResultsWe developed a new approach to identifying the binding motifs of individual DBDs of a TF through analyzing chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) experiments in which a single DBD is mutated: we train a deep convolutional neural network to predict whether wild-type TF binding sites are preserved in the mutant TF dataset and interpret the model. We applied this approach to mouse CTCF ChIP-seq data and, in addition to identifying the known binding preferences of CTCF ZFs 3-11, we identified a GAG binding motif for ZF1 and a weak ATT binding motif for ZF2. We analyzed other CTCF datasets to provide additional evidence that ZFs 1-2 interact with the motifs we identified, and we found that the presence of the motif for ZF1 is associated with Ctcf peak strength. ConclusionsOur approach can be applied to any TF for which in vivo binding data from both the wild-type and mutated versions of the TF are available, and our findings provide an unprecedently comprehensive understanding of the binding preferences of CTCFs DBDs.

genomics↗

Learning RNA secondary structure (only) from structure probing data

1. Introduction 1. Introduction 2. Methods 3. Experiments 4. Discussion References The structure of an RNA molecule is critical to its function. Structured regions in an RNA molecule permit or impede the binding of proteins and small molecules, resulting in downstream effects on gene expression [24, 16]. However, accurate determination of RNA structure is an involved process, requiring tedious experimentation [8, 1, 10] or careful analysis of evolutionary constraints [9]. As such, several computational methods have been developed to determine RNA structure in silico. In this work, we focus on methods that predict an RNAs secondary structure - the set of complementary Watson-Crick basepairs. These methods may be broadly ...

bioinformatics↗