bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Fitzpatrick, A. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Fitzpatrick, A. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Egocentric value maps of the near-body environment

Body-part centric response fields are pervasive: they are observed in single neurons, fMRI, EEG, and multiple behavioural measures. This prevalence across scales and measures makes them excellent candidates for studying systems-level neuroscience. Nonetheless, they remain poorly understood because we lack a unifying formal explanation of their origins and role in wider brain function. Here, we provide such explanation. We use reinforcement learning to analytically explain the existence of body-part centric receptive fields, also known as peripersonal field. We then simulate multiple experimental findings considered foundational in the peripersonal space literature. Our results demonstrate that peripersonal fields naturally arise from two simple and plausible assumptions about living agents: 1) they experience reward when they contact objects in the environment, and 2) they act to maximise reward. These simple assumptions are enough to explain empirical findings on stimulus kinematics, tool use, valence, and network-architecture. Our explanation provides further insight. First, it offers multiple empirically testable predictions. Second, it offers a formal description of the notion that the world-agent state is encoded in parieto-premotor cortices, using motor primitives: peripersonal fields provide building blocks that together create a short-term model of the world near the agent in terms of its future states; a successor representation. This short-term, close-range egocentric peripersonal map is analogous to the long-term, long-range allocentric spatial map of place and grid cells, which underlie locomotion and navigation to reach distant objects. Together, these allocentric and egocentric maps allow efficient interactions with a changing environment across multiple spatial and temporal scales. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=149 SRC="FIGDIR/small/504456v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (68K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c9d635org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e4b1corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@65390borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1840160_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

neuroscience↗

No effects of offline high frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation to posterior parietal cortex on the choice of which hand to use to perform a reaching task.

The current study used a high frequency TMS protocol known as continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to test a model of hand choice that relies on competing interactions between the hemispheres of the posterior parietal cortex. Based on the assumption that cTBS reduces cortical excitability, the model predicts a significant decrease in the likelihood of selecting the hand contralateral to stimulation. An established behavioural paradigm was used to estimate hand choice in each individual, and these measures were compared across three stimulation conditions: cTBS to the left posterior parietal cortex, cTBS to the right posterior parietal cortex, or sham cTBS. Our results provide no supporting evidence for the interhemispheric competition model. We find no effects of cTBS on hand choice, independent of whether the left or right posterior parietal cortex was stimulated. Our results are nonetheless of value as a point of comparison against prior brain stimulation findings that, in contrast, provide evidence for a causal role for the posterior parietal cortex in hand choice. HighlightsO_LIHigh-frequency TMS applied to the left and right posterior parietal cortex, separately, did not produce reliable aftereffects on hand choice. C_LIO_LIResponse times to initiate actions were significantly increased when reaching near the point in space where hand choice was equally probable. C_LI

animal behavior and cognition↗