bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Fito, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Fito, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

genuMet: distinguish genuine untargeted metabolic features without quality control samples

MotivationLarge-scale untargeted metabolomics experiments lead to detection of thousands of novel metabolic features as well as false positive artifacts. With the incorporation of pooled QC samples and corresponding bioinformatics algorithms, those measurement artifacts can be well quality controlled. However, it is impracticable for all the studies to apply such experimental design.\n\nResultsWe introduce a post-alignment quality control method called genuMet, which is solely based on injection order of biological samples to identify potential false metabolic features. In terms of the missing pattern of metabolic signals, genuMet can reach over 95% true negative rate and 85% true positive rate with suitable parameters, compared with the algorithm utilizing pooled QC samples. genu-Met makes it possible for studies without pooled QC samples to reduce false metabolic signals and perform robust statistical analysis.\n\nAvailability and implementationgenuMet is implemented in a R package and available on https://github.com/liucaomics/genuMet under GPL-v2 license.\n\nContactLiming Liang: lliang@hsph.harvard.edu\n\nSupplementary informationSupplementary data are available at ....

bioinformatics↗

High-density lipoprotein characteristics and coronary heart disease: a Mendelian randomization study

BackgroundThe causal role of high-density lipoproteins (HDL) in coronary artery disease (CAD) has been questioned. Our aim was to analyze whether genetically determined quantitative and qualitative HDL characteristics were independently associated with CAD. MethodsWe designed a two-sample multivariate Mendelian randomization study with available genome-wide association summary data. We identified genetic variants associated with HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I quantity, HDL size, particle levels, and lipid content to define our genetic instrumental variables in one sample (Kettunen et al study, N=24,925) and analyzed their association with CAD risk in a different study (CARDIoGRAMplusC4D, N=184,305). We validated these results by defining our genetic variables in another database (METSIM, N=8,372) and studied their relationship with CAD in the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D dataset. To estimate the effect size of the associations of interest adjusted for other lipoprotein traits (potential pleiotropy) we used the Multi-trait-based Conditional & Joint analysis. ResultsGenetically determined HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I levels were not associated with CAD. HDL mean diameter ({beta}=0.27 [95%CI=0.19; 0.35]), cholesterol levels in very large HDLs ({beta}=0.29 [95%CI=0.17; 0.40]), and triglyceride content in very large HDLs ({beta}=0.14 [95%CI=0.040; 0.25]) were directly associated with CAD risk, whereas the cholesterol content in medium-sized HDLs ({beta}=-0.076 [95%CI=-0.10; -0.052]) was inversely related to this risk. These results were validated in the METSIM-CARDIoGRAMplusC4D data. Genetic variants linked to both HDL qualitative traits and CAD risk were located within LIPC, the APOE/C1/C4/C2 cluster, APOB, PCIF1-PLTP, and TTC39B. ConclusionsSome HDL characteristics related to size, particle distribution, and triglyceride content are related to CAD risk whilst HDL cholesterol levels are not. This relationship could be mediated by the hepatic lipase; the apolipoproteins E, C-I, and B; the phospholipid transfer protein; and the tetratricopeptide repeat domain protein 39B, which arise as potential therapeutic targets in cardiovascular disease.

epidemiology↗