bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Fine, J. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Fine, J. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Transcranial focused ultrasound enhances behavioral and network mechanisms underlying response inhibition in humans

Response inhibition is important to avoid undesirable behavioral action consequences. Neuroimaging and lesion studies point to a locus of inhibitory control in right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG). Electrophysiology studies have implicated a downstream event-related potential from rIFG, the fronto-central P300, as a putative neural marker of the success and timing of inhibition over behavioral responses. However, it remains to be established whether rIFG effectively drives inhibition as represented by the P300 activity, and whether rIFG contributions to inhibition are conveyed through either the P300 timing or amplitude. Here, we aimed to causally uncover the connection between rIFG and P300 for inhibition by using transcranial focused ultrasound (tfUS) to target rIFG of human subjects while they performed a Stop-Signal task. By applying tFUS simultaneous with different task events, we found behavioral inhibition was improved only when applied to rIFG simultaneous with a stop signal. Applying tFUS simultaneous with the go signal or control regions had no impact on behavior. The improvement in inhibition performance caused by tFUS to rIFG during stop conditions occurred through faster stopping times that were paired with significantly shorter P300 latencies, whereas amplitude was not affected. These results reveal a causal connection between rIFG in driving response inhibition in that it may regulate the speed of stopping directly, as indexed by the reduced P300 onset latency during tFUS. Our tFUS-EEG approach provides a causal connection, in healthy humans, between prefrontal rIFG regions and downstream P300 production in service of inhibitory control.

neuroscience

Choice of Contact Points Modulates Sensorimotor Cortical Interactions for Dexterous Manipulation

Humans are unique in their ability to perform dexterous object manipulation in a wide variety of scenarios. However, previous work has used a grasping context that predominantly elicits memory-based control of digit forces by constraining where the object should be grasped. For this constrained grasping context, primary motor cortex (M1) is involved in storage and retrieval of digit forces used in previous manipulations. In contrast, when choice of digit contact points is allowed ( unconstrained grasping), behavioral studies revealed that forces are adjusted, on a trial-to-trial basis, as a function of digit position. This suggests a role of online feedback that detects digit position, rather than memory, for force control. However, despite the ubiquitous nature of unconstrained hand-object interactions in activities of daily living, the underlying neural mechanisms are unknown. Using non-invasive brain stimulation and electroencephalography, we found the role of M1 to be sensitive to grasping condition. While confirming the role of M1 in storing and retrieving learned digit forces and position in constrained grasping, we also found that M1 is involved in modulating digit forces to digit position in unconstrained grasping. Furthermore, we found that digit force modulation to position relies on sensorimotor integration mediated by primary sensory cortex (S1) and M1. This finding supports the notion of a greater contribution of somatosensory feedback of digit position in unconstrained grasping. We conclude that the relative contribution of memory and online feedback based on whether contact points are constrained or unconstrained modulates sensorimotor cortical interactions for dexterous manipulation.

neuroscience