bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ferragu, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Ferragu, C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

What comes after de novo? Automated lead optimization of proteins with CRADLE-1

Lead optimization remains the longest and most expensive step in pre-clinical drug discovery, typically consuming 12-36 months whilst costing $5M-$15M per candidate. We introduce O_SCPLOWCRADLEC_SCPLOWO_SCPCAP-1C_SCPCAP, an automated framework for protein engineering. While O_SCPLOWCRADLEC_SCPLOWO_SCPCAP-1C_SCPCAP supports the full process of drug discovery and industrial protein engineering pipelines, including hit identification and de novo binder design, this work focuses on its application to multi-property lead optimization across protein modalities (VHHs, scFvs, IgGs, peptides, enzymes, CRISPR systems, vaccines). We show it is 4-7x faster than rational design, as measured by the number of wet lab rounds required. We provide in-vitro validation across all of the above modalities, typically optimizing multiple properties simultaneously (single and polyspecific binding down to picomolar, activity, thermostability,...). Technically, O_SCPLOWCRADLEC_SCPLOWO_SCPCAP-1C_SCPCAP starts with pre-trained foundation protein language models (PLMs), which are fine-tuned in unsupervised fashion on evolutionary neighborhoods, in supervised fashion using lab-in-the-loop data, and then deployed in a multi-model workflow. Of additional interest, we find that (a) the end-to-end system may be run in automated fashion; (b) wet lab data may be consumed in black box fashion without knowledge of the underlying biochemical mechanisms; (c) structural data may largely be superseded by sequence-function pairs.

bioengineering↗

Crowdsourced Protein Design: Lessons From the Adaptyv EGFR Binder Competition

In this report, we summarize and analyze the 2024 Adaptyv protein design competition. Participants used computational and Machine Learning (ML) methods of their choice to design proteins that bind the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), a key drug target involved in cell growth, differentiation, and cancer development. Over 1,800 designs were submitted across two rounds. Of these, 601 proteins were selected and characterized for expression and binding affinity to EGFR, with competitors both optimizing existing binders (KD = 1.21 nM) and creating de novo binders (KD = 82 nM). All selected designs were experimentally validated using Adaptyvs automated Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI) pipeline. This competition illustrates the potential of crowdsourcing to drive creativity and innovation in protein design. However, it also exposed key challenges, such as the lack of standardized benchmarks, experimental design targets, and robust computational metrics for method comparison. We anticipate that future competitions will address these gaps and further motivate progress in computational protein design.

bioengineering↗