bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ferguson, S. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Ferguson, S. S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Cell Painting and machine learning for mechanistic profiling of hepatotoxic botanicals and their constituents

BACKGROUND Botanicals are widely consumed as herbal remedies and plant-derived products, but their complex and variable chemical composition presents major challenges for safety assessment. Although hepatotoxicity has been reported for several botanicals, the constituent compounds responsible and the underlying mechanisms often remain poorly characterised. OBJECTIVES We aimed to determine whether Cell Painting could identify candidate constituent drivers of botanical bioactivity and generate hypotheses about potential mechanisms of action in primary human hepatocytes. METHODS We profiled 13 botanical extracts and 85 known constituents across multiple concentrations using Cell Painting alongside assays of metabolic activity and membrane integrity. To interpret morphological phenotypes, we trained machine-learning models using a Cell Painting reference atlas of >1,000 chemicals linked to ToxCast/Tox21 molecular and cellular bioactivity annotations. RESULTS Cell Painting detected bioactivity in 11/13 botanical extracts and 46/85 constituents, compared with 9/13 extracts and 40/85 constituents in the cell-health assays, and generally detected activity at lower concentrations. For 9/13 extracts, at least one constituent was active at a lower concentration than the corresponding botanical extract, supporting the contribution of a subset of potent constituents to mixture-level responses. Aristolochia and goldenseal were the most potent extracts across Cell Painting and cell-health assays and contained highly active constituents. Reference-atlas models generated specific mechanistic hypotheses, including cytotoxicity-, endocrine-, and genotoxicity-associated responses for several botanicals and constituents. CONCLUSION These results support Cell Painting combined with machine learning as a sensitive approach for characterising cellular responses to botanicals, prioritising candidate constituent drivers of hepatotoxicity-associated phenotypes, and generating testable hypotheses about potential mechanisms of action.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

Systematic assessment of transcriptomic and phenotypic biological profiling for mechanism-based hazard assessment using target-annotated reference chemicals in renal proximal tubular epithelial cells

Integrating high-throughput in vitro data into next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) workflows requires screening strategies that yield quantitative potency estimates and mechanistically interpretable biological signals. Transcriptomic and morphological profiling are increasingly adopted for early-stage hazard identification by enabling triage of substances for resource-intensive follow-up and prioritizing candidates most likely to present meaningful risk. In this study, we aimed to characterize biological concordance and uncertainty by quantifying how well high-throughput transcriptomics (HTTr) and Cell Painting PLUS (CPP) bioactivity profiles recover target-relevant biological signals in immortalized human renal proximal tubule epithelial RPTEC/TERT1 cells using 313 reference chemicals with high-confidence target annotations. Through quality control procedures and biological activity filters we yielded 142 reference chemicals spanning 66 different targets, which were systematically evaluated for biological concentration-responses by HTTr and CPP. HTTr was evaluated using TXG-MAPr-based qualitative and quantitative gene network activity analysis. HTTr showed the most prominent activity for targets that were highest expressed in RPTEC/TERT1 cells. Active chemical-pairs showed strong gene network activity correlation albeit with different potencies. Similarly, the highest transcriptomic concordance was observed for reference chemicals acting in the same pathway, such as EGFR/MEK or PI3K/AKT/mTOR. CPP often showed high sensitivity primarily at the organelle level providing limited statistical power for chemical grouping. Collectively, the results support HTTr and CPP as complementary early-tier assays within an in vitro weight-of-evidence safety testing framework. Although CPP is suitable as a cost-effective screening modality, HTTr offers higher mechanistic resolution for mode-of-action inference in high-throughput bioactivity screening and therefore remains necessary for high-confidence mechanistic interpretation.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

High-throughput transcriptomics and benchmark concentration modeling for potency ranking of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in exposed human liver cell spheroids

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are some of the most prominent organic contaminants in human blood. Although the toxicological implications from human exposure to perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) are well established, data on lesser-understood PFAS are limited. New approach methodologies (NAMs) that apply bioinformatic tools to high-throughput data are being increasingly considered to inform risk assessment for data-poor chemicals. The aim of this investigation was to identify biological response potencies (i.e., benchmark concentrations: BMCs) following PFAS exposures to inform read-across for risk assessment of data-poor PFAS. Gene expression changes were measured in primary human liver cell microtissues (i.e., 3D spheroids) after 1-day and 10-day exposures to increasing concentrations of 23 PFAS. The cells were treated with four subgroups of PFAS: carboxylates (PFCAs), sulfonates (PFSAs), fluorotelomers, and sulfonamides. An established pipeline to identify differentially expressed genes and transcriptomic BMCs was applied. We found that both PFCAs and PFSAs exhibited a trend toward increased transcriptional changes with carbon chain-length. Specifically, longer-chain compounds (7 to 10 carbons) were more likely to induce changes in gene expression, and have lower transcriptional BMCs. The combined high-throughput transcriptomic and bioinformatic analyses supports the capability of NAMs to efficiently assess the effects of PFAS in liver microtissues. The data enable potency ranking of PFAS for human liver cell spheroid cytotoxicity and transcriptional changes, and assessment of in vitro transcriptomic points of departure. These data improve our understanding of the health effects of PFAS and will be used to inform read-across for human health risk assessment.

genomics↗

High-throughput transcriptomic evaluation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in primary human liver spheroids to inform read-across

Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are widely found in the environment because of their extensive use and persistence. Although several PFAS are well studied, most lack toxicity data to inform human health hazard and risk assessment. This study focussed on four model PFAS: perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA; 8 carbon), perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS; 4 carbon), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS; 8 carbon), and perfluorodecane sulfonate (PFDS; 10 carbon). Human primary liver cell spheroids (pooled from 10 donors) were exposed to 10 concentrations of each PFAS and analyzed at four time-points. The approach aimed to: (1) identify gene expression changes mediated by the PFAS; (2) identify similarities in biological responses; (3) compare PFAS potency through benchmark concentration analysis; and (4) derive bioactivity exposure ratios (ratio of the concentration at which biological responses occur, relative to daily human exposure). All PFAS induced transcriptional changes in cholesterol biosynthesis and lipid metabolism pathways, and predicted PPAR activation. PFOS exhibited the most transcriptional activity and had a highly similar gene expression profile to PFDS. PFBS induced the least transcriptional changes and the highest benchmark concentration (i.e., was the least potent). The data indicate that these PFAS may have common molecular targets and toxicities, but that PFOS and PFDS are the most similar. The transcriptomic bioactivity exposure ratios derived here for PFOA and PFOS were comparable to those derived using rodent apical endpoints in risk assessments. These data provide a baseline level of toxicity for comparison with other known PFAS using this testing strategy.

genomics↗