bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Federmann, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Federmann, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Differential responses of murine embryonic stem cells (mESC) and their endothelial progeny to doxorubicin and pharmacological inhibitors of DNA repair and DNA damage response

The clinical use of the anticancer drug doxorubicin (Dox) is limited by irreversible cardiotoxicity. The detailed molecular mechanisms involved and the pathophysiological relevance of different cardiac cell types, including progenitor cells, are still unclear. Here, we investigated stress responses of murine embryonic stem cells (mESC), endothelial progenitor cells (EC d4) and terminally differentiated endothelial-like cells (EC d6) following exposure to Dox and selected pharmacological inhibitors of DNA repair and DNA damage response (DDR) (RAD51i B02 and HDACi entinostat (EST)). We found that EC d4 exhibited a pronounced Dox hypersensitivity as compared to both mESC and EC d6, which was independent of drug transport. Analysis of EdU incorporation and replication fork progression following drug treatment revealed substantial agent-specific differences between mESC and the various differentiation stages. Furthermore, cellular susceptibility to drug-induced formation of DNA damage (i.e. DSB and SSB) also changes with ongoing differentiation and drug treatment, with mESC and EC d4 / EC d6 being particular prone to enhanced residual SSB and DSB levels, respectively. Dox treatment of EC d4 did not affect their differentiation into EC d6, but caused multiple functional impairments of the surviving EC d6 progeny, including defects in mitochondrial homeostasis, barrier function related to cell-cell adhesion factors ZO1 and VE-cadherin, response to cytokine stimulation as well as LDL uptake. To summarize, we show substantial differences in the response of mESC, EC d4 and EC d6 to Dox and pharmacological inhibitors of DNA repair and DDR. Most important, treatment of EC d4 results in pronounced persisting functional impairments of differentiated EC d6, pointing to a transient particularly drug-sensitive time window during endothelial differentiation. These findings are important for hazard assessment in developmental toxicology and regenerative medicine in the context of anticancer drug-induced normal tissue damage. Highlights- EC d4 are most vulnerable towards Dox-induced cytotoxicity independent of drug transport - EC d4 and EC d6 display higher steady-state levels of drug-induced DSB as compared to mESC - Drug-induced replication stress is highest in mESC and decreases with differentiation. - Both Dox and DNA repair/DDR inhibitors damage mitochondrial homeostasis in EC d4 and EC d6 - Terminally differentiated EC d6 derived from drug-treated EC d4 display multiple functional impairments

pharmacology and toxicology↗

Overcoming acquired doxorubicin resistance of ovarian carcinoma cells by verapamil-mediated promotion of DNA damage-driven cell death

The therapeutic efficacy of anticancer therapeutics is limited by acquired drug resistance of tumor cells. Here, we aim to characterize and overcome resistance mechanisms of ovarian cancer cells to the anthracycline derivative doxorubicin (Doxo). To this end, comparative analyses of Doxo-induced stress responses of parental A2780 and Doxo-resistant A2780ADR variant were performed. A2780ADR cells revealed cross-resistance to multiple compounds, including anticancer drugs (cisplatin (CisPt), etoposide (Eto)) and DNA repair/ DNA damage response (DDR) inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, entinostat, prexasertib, rabusertib). A2780ADR cells formed significantly less DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) after Doxo exposure as compared to A2780, resulting in a mitigated DDR, reduced proliferation inhibition and attenuated apoptosis. Potential resistance mechanisms identified to contribute to Doxo resistance of A2780ADR cells include increased Doxo efflux due to increased MDR1 expression and reduced topoisomerase II protein expression. Substantial resensitization of A2780ADR cells to Doxo was achieved by both the RAC1 GTPase inhibitor EHT1864, the histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat (Est) and, most effectively, the calcium channel blocker verapamil (Ver). Notably, Ver-mediated sensitization also pertains to Eto and CisPt. The synergistic effect of Ver in combination with Doxo, which is reflected by low combination index (CI), likely involves inhibition of MDR1-mediated drug transport, leading to increased intracellular steady state levels of Doxo and elevated DNA damage formation, eventually promoting pro-apoptotic DDR. However, combination treatment with Doxo and Ver also increased the cytotoxic response of non-malignant murine cardiomyocytes (HL-1), murine embryonic stem cells (mESC) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC). Based on our data we suggest inhibition of MDR1-mediated Doxo efflux by Ver as a useful approach to overcome acquired drug resistance of A2780ADR cells because it promotes DDR-related pro-death mechanisms, yet at the price of a potentially increased risk of normal tissue toxicity. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=123 SRC="FIGDIR/small/650268v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@43c0e5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2d1c5forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a1d97borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cd4522_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOGraphical abstract:C_FLOATNO Verapamil-mediated resensitization of Doxo-resistant tumor cells.As concluded from our data we suggest that verapamil increases the anticancer efficacy of doxorubicin (Doxo) in a synergistic manner in anticancer drug resistant ovarian A2780ADR cells. This is likely due to inhibition of MDR1-mediated drug export by Ver, leading to higher intracellular steady-state concentrations of Doxo. In consequence, Doxo-mediated Topo II poisoning is promoted, eventually causing increased DNA damage (DSB) formation and activation of DDR-related signaling mechanims, which in turn impair cell proliferation and stimulate cell death. Apart from verapamil, inhibition of Rac1 GTPase-regulated signaling by EHT1864 and inhibition of HDACs class I by the HDACi entinostat are also useful to overcome Doxo resistance of A2780ADR cells, yet with the exact molecular mechanisms involved being still unclear. C_FIG

pharmacology and toxicology↗