bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Fatkhullin, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Fatkhullin, B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Constructive neutral evolution explains the emergence of specialised ribosomes in diverse eukaryotes.

Throughout eukaryotic evolution, the structure of the ribosome has been highly conserved, featuring 80 common protein gene families. However, in many eukaryotes, paralogs of these proteins are present. "Specialised ribosomes" have been documented across diverse groups of eukaryotes where they play an important role in the regulation of translation of specific mRNAs. In the case of specialised ribosomes it has been documented that assembled ribosomes that contain specific paralogs can directly affect translational output. This has been proposed to contribute to the regulation of complex responses to environmental change and to coordinate cell-type specific physiology. This poses the question of whether ribosome specialisation principally emerges under an adaptive or neutral model of evolution. Using gene tree-species tree reconciliation, we test competing hypotheses regarding the evolutionary drivers of ribosome specialisation. We determine that examples of specialisation tend to emerge by independent duplication of the same ribosomal proteins in different lineages. We show that pathways to specialisation through paralog formation have arisen independent of: (i) paralog location within the 3D ribosome complex, and (ii) positive selection in these paralogs. We determine that the generalisable model of best fit for the evolution of paralog-mediated eukaryotic ribosomal specialisation is one of constructive neutral evolution. In lineages with small effective population sizes and increased complexity, the emergence and retention of ribosomal protein paralogs has provided the raw material for ratcheting and the emergence of translational regulation at the level of the ribosome.

evolutionary biology↗

Translational activity of 80S monosomes varies dramatically across different tissues

SummaryTranslational regulation at the stage of initiation can impact the number of ribosomes translating each mRNA molecule. However, the translational activity of single 80S ribosomes (monosomes) on mRNA is less well understood, even though these 80S monosomes represent the dominant ribosomal complexes in vivo. Here, we used cryo-EM to determine the translational activity of 80S monosomes across different tissues in Drosophila melanogaster. We discovered that while head and embryo 80S monosomes are highly translationally active, testis and ovary 80S monosomes are translationally inactive. RNA-Seq analysis of head monosome- and polysome-translated mRNAs, revealed that head 80S monosomes preferentially translate mRNAs with TOP motifs, short 5-UTRs, short ORFs and are enriched for uORFs. Overall, these findings highlight that regulation of translation initiation, and that protein synthesis is mostly performed by monosomes in head and embryo, whilst polysomes are the main source of protein production in testis and ovary. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=87 SRC="FIGDIR/small/600330v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (21K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12881e5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6804dborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@116fa63org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19095d6_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsO_LID. melanogaster 80S monosomes and polysomes purified from different tissues exhibit different translational activities C_LIO_LIHead and 0-2 hr embryo 80S monosomes are highly translationally active C_LIO_LITestis and ovary 80S monosomes are translationally inactive C_LIO_LIHead 80S monosomes preferentially translate mRNAs with TOP motifs, short 5-UTRs, short ORFs and are enriched for uORFs C_LIO_LIHead polysomes preferentially translate mRNAs with neuronal functions C_LI

molecular biology↗