bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Fatemi, S. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Fatemi, S. A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The Contribution of Circulating Endocannabinoid Tone to Individual Differences in Human Pain Sensitivity: A Quantitative Sensory Testing Study

The endocannabinoid (eCB) system--comprising cannabinoid receptors, eCBs (anandamide-- AEA, 2-arachidonoylglycerol--2-AG) and related N-acylethanolamines (NAEs; N-palmitoylethanolamide--PEA, and N-oleoylethanolamide--OEA), and metabolizing enzymes (e.g., fatty acid amide hydrolase; FAAH)--modulates nociceptive circuits in rodents. In humans, the FAAH C385A polymorphism is associated with reduced pain sensitivity, suggesting eCB tone influences individual pain differences, but this has yet to be tested. Here, we determined whether the eCB system is associated with somatosensory and pain sensitivity measured with quantitative sensory testing (QST) in 91 healthy participants (39 males, 52 females). We tested three hypotheses: (1) FAAH C385A polymorphism, cannabis use, and sex affect serum eCB/NAE concentrations; (2) FAAH C385A carriers show altered pain sensitivity versus non-carriers; and (3) baseline serum eCB/NAE concentrations are associated with QST measures. eCB/NAE concentrations were not statistically different based on sex (p > .05), based on FAAH genotype (p > .05), and based on cannabis use (p > .05). To address collinearity of AEA, OEA and PEA, we performed a principal components analysis, which identified a single component of FAAH substrates. Linear regressions found that FAAH genotype did not affect QST measures and that baseline 2-AG and FAAH substrate concentrations were not associated with QST measures, except pressure pain thresholds (PPT; p = 0.003), which were associated with AEA and OEA. Baseline eCB/NAE levels and FAAH genotype are not associated with the outcome measures of standard QST tests that rely on point estimates in healthy adult humans; nonetheless, circulating FAAH substrate levels were associated with PPT.

neuroscience↗

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for Association of Helicobacter pylori Colonization and Celiac Disease

Background and objectivesBased on some previous observational studies there is a theory that suggests a potential relationship between Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) colonization and celiac disease (CD), however, the type of this relationship is still controversial. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore all related primary studies to find any possible association between CD and human H. pylori colonization. Data sourcesStudies were systematically searched and collected from four databases and different types of gray literature to cover all available evidence. After screening, the quality and risk of bias assessment of the selected articles were evaluated. Synthesis methodsMeta-analysis calculated pooled odds ratio (OR) on the extracted data. Furthermore, heterogeneity, sensitivity, subgroups, and publication bias analyses were assessed. ResultsTwenty-four studies were included in this systematic review, with a total of 5241 cases and 132947 control people. The results of meta-analysis on 24 studies showed a significant and negative association between H. pylori colonization and CD (pooled OR= 0.58; 95% CI = 0.45 - 0.76; P < 0.001), with no publication bias (P = 0.407). The LAbbe plots also showed a trend of having more H. pylori colonization in the control group. Among subgroups, ORs were notably different only when the data were stratified by continents or risk of bias; however, subgroup analysis could not determine the source of heterogeneity. ConclusionsAccording to the meta-analysis, H. pylori has a mild protective role toward CD. Although this negative association is not strong, it is statistically significant and should be further considered. Further investigations in both molecular and clinic fields with proper methodology and more detailed information are needed to discover more evidence and underlying mechanisms to clear the interactive aspects of H. pylori colonization in CD patients. Systematic review registration number (PROSPERO)CRD42020167730

microbiology↗