Biology subjects

Ezard, T. H. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Ezard, T. H. G..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Assessing the application of landmark-free morphometrics to macroevolutionary analyses

The study of phenotypic evolution has been transformed by methods allowing three-dimensional quantification of anatomical form. The present state-of-the-art 3D geometric morphometrics, which relies heavily on manual landmarking, is time-consuming, prone to operator bias, and cannot effectively compare disparate shapes. Emerging automated approaches, notably landmark-free techniques, offer promise but have only been applied to closely related species. Here, we compare landmark-free approaches with high-density geometric morphometric methods on 322 mammals across 180 families. Leveraging the benefits of Poisson meshes, which combine open and closed projections, we show how landmark-free methods have greater power to differentiate major taxonomic groups. Although there is coarse correspondence in shape variation between the two methods, the finer features of the landmark-free approach likely reflect its broader sampling of the surface structure. Our study underscores the robustness of landmark-free methods for large-scale comparative analysis and helps propel morphometrics into a new era of bigger data.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2023

A standard protocol to report discrete stage-structured demographic information

O_LIStage-based demographic methods, such as matrix population models (MPMs), are powerful tools used to address a broad range of fundamental questions in ecology, evolutionary biology, and conservation science. Accordingly, MPMs now exist for over 3,000 species worldwide. These data are being digitised as an ongoing process and periodically released into two large open-access online repositories: the COMPADRE Plant Matrix Database and the COMADRE Animal Matrix Database. During the last decade, data archiving and curation of COMPADRE and COMADRE, and subsequent comparative research, have revealed pronounced variation in how MPMs are parameterized and reported. C_LIO_LIHere, we summarise current issues related to the parameterisation and reporting of MPMs that arise most frequently and outline how they affect MPM construction, analysis, and interpretation. To quantify variation in how MPMs are reported, we present results from a survey identifying key aspects of MPMs that are frequently unreported in manuscripts. We then screen COMPADRE and COMADRE to quantify how often key pieces of information are omitted from manuscripts using MPMs. C_LIO_LIOver 80% of surveyed researchers (n=60) state a clear benefit to adopting more standardised methodologies for reporting MPMs. Furthermore, over 85% of the 300 MPMs assessed from COMPADRE and COMADRE omitted one or more elements that are key to their accurate interpretation. Based on these insights, we identify fundamental issues that can arise from MPM construction and communication and provide suggestions to improve clarity, reproducibility, and future research utilising MPMs and their required metadata. To fortify reproducibility and empower researchers to take full advantage of their demographic data, we introduce a standardized protocol to present MPMs in publications. This standard is linked to www.compadre-db.org, so that authors wishing to archive their MPMs can do so prior to submission of publications, following examples from other open-access repositories such as DRYAD, Figshare, and Zenodo. C_LIO_LICombining and standardising MPMs parameterized from populations around the globe and across the tree of life opens up powerful research opportunities in evolutionary biology, ecology, and conservation research. However, this potential can only be fully realised by adopting standardised methods to ensure reproducibility. C_LI

ecology↗

bioRxiv2018

Surface sediment samples from early age of seafloor exploration can provide a late 19th century baseline of the marine environment

Ocean-floor sediment samples collected up to 150 years ago represent an important historical archive to benchmark global changes in the seafloor environment, such as species range shifts and invasions and pollution trends. Such benchmarking requires that the historical sediment samples represent the state of the environment at or shortly before the time of collection. However, early oceanographic expeditions sampled the ocean floor using devices like the sounding tube or a dredge, which potentially disturb the sediment surface and recover a mix of Holocene (surface) and deeper, Pleistocene sediments. Here we use climate-sensitive microfossils as a fast biometric method to assess if historical seafloor samples contain a mixture of modern and glacial sediments. Our assessment is based on comparing the composition of planktonic foraminifera (PF) assemblages in historical samples with Holocene and Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) global reference datasets. We show that eight out of the nine historical samples contain PF assemblages more similar to the Holocene than to the LGM PF assemblages, but the comparisons are only significant when there is a high local species temporal turnover (from the LGM to the Holocene). When analysing temporal turnover globally, we show that upwelling and temperate regions had greatest species turnover, which are areas where our methodology would be most diagnostic. Our results suggest that sediment samples from historical collections can provide a baseline of the state of marine ecosystems in the late 19th century, and thus be used to assess ocean global change trends.

paleontology↗