bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Elya, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Elya, C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A fungal pathogen that robustly manipulates the behavior of Drosophila melanogaster in the laboratory

Many microbes induce striking behavioral changes in their animal hosts, but how they achieve this is poorly understood, especially at the molecular level. Mechanistic understanding has been largely constrained by the lack of a model system with advanced tools for molecular manipulation. We recently discovered a strain of the behavior-manipulating fungal pathogen Entomophthora muscae infecting wild Drosophila, and established methods to infect D. melanogaster in the lab. Lab-infected flies manifest the moribund behaviors characteristic of E. muscae infection: hours before death, they climb upward, extend their proboscides and affix in place, then raise their wings, clearing a path for infectious spores to launch from their abdomens. We found that E. muscae invades the fly nervous system, suggesting a direct means by which the fungus could induce behavioral changes. Given the vast molecular toolkit available for D. melanogaster, we believe this new system will enable rapid progress in understanding the mechanistic basis of E. muscaes behavioral manipulation in the fly.

animal behavior and cognition

Or22 allelic variation alone does not explain differences in discrimination of yeast-produced volatiles by D. melanogaster

Different lines of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster show variation in the ability to discriminate between volatiles produced by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae under natural (nitrogen-limiting, YVN) or laboratory (sugar-limiting, YVL) conditions. Previous work in our laboratory uncovered a strong correlation between heightened sensitivity to YVN wild D. melanogaster lines that harbored a chimeric variant of the highly variable odorant receptor 22 (Or22) locus of D. melanogaster. We sought to determine if this trend held for an extended set of D. melanogaster lines, if observed variation within chimeric and non-chimeric lines could be explained by nucleotide polymorphisms and if replacing Or22 with a chimeric allele in a non-chimeric background could confer the enhanced ability to detect YVN. In parallel, we performed crosses of chimeric and non-chimeric fly lines and assayed the behavior of their progeny for enhanced sensitivity to YVN to assess the heritability of the Or22 locus. Ultimately, we found that, while the overall trend of increased sensitivity to YVN in chimeric lines persists, there are exceptions and variation that cannot be explained by sequence variation at the Or22 locus. In addition, we did not observe increased sensitivity for YVN upon replacing the Or22 allele in a non-chimeric line (OreR) with that from our most YVN-sensitive, chimeric line (ME). Though our results do not support our hypothesis that Or22 is the primary driver of sensitivity to YVN, Or22 remains an interesting locus in the context of fly-yeast ecology.

genetics