bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Eldfors, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Eldfors, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Sensitivity to ATR-CHK1 pathway inhibition in AML/MDS is enhanced by SRSF2 mutations and reduced by RUNX1 loss

SRSF2 mutations occur in up to 25% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 17% of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) cases and are associated with poor prognosis, yet no mutation-directed therapy exists. Here, we aimed to identify therapeutically targetable vulnerabilities in MDS/AML with SRSF2 mutations. Ex vivo drug-sensitivity testing of bone marrow cells from AML patients and healthy donors showed that SRSF2-mutant cells are sensitive to inhibitors of CHK1, and WEE1 DNA damage response (DDR) kinases. To test causality, we engineered isogenic K562 cell line clones expressing SRSF2P95H/L/R mutations. RNA sequencing confirmed splicing aberrations characteristic of MDS/AML in these clones. We found that SRSF2P95H/L/R sensitize leukemia cells to ATR-CHK1-WEE1 inhibition. Bone marrow progenitors from Srsf2P95H and U2AF1S34F knock-in mice showed heightened sensitivity to CHK1 inhibition, corroborating the human data. In contrast, RUNX1 mutations were linked to resistance against CHK1 and WEE1 inhibition in SRSF2-mutant AML samples. Runx1 loss also caused resistance to CHK1 inhibitors in knock-in mouse progenitors harboring Srsf2P95H or U2AF1S34F, indicating that RUNX1 loss is a mechanism of resistance. In conclusion, SRSF2 and U2AF1 mutations are biomarkers of sensitivity to ATR-CHK1 pathway inhibitors, while RUNX1 mutations cause resistance. These biomarkers can support patient stratification in MDS/AML.

cancer biology↗

Whole Exome Sequencing and Single-Cell DNA Sequencing for Assessment of Clonal Heterogeneity and Evolution in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

BackgroundAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) progresses by the accumulation of somatic mutations and clonal expansion of pre-leukemic cells. Patients may respond to initial therapy, but often relapse, underscoring an evolving disease. Next generation sequencing technologies are being applied to AML for risk stratification and monitoring treatment response. We aimed to evaluate the efficiency of whole exome sequencing (WES) and single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) for determining clonal heterogeneity and evolution in AML induced by treatment, assessing strengths and limitations of each technology. MethodsWe conducted WES and scDNA-seq on samples from 6 patients with AML, including sequential samples from four patients. We identified somatic variants, clonal composition and phylogeny using both technologies and compared the results. ResultsWES detected more variants and clones due to broader coverage, while scDNA-seq provided clonality results for targeted genes revealing zygosity and rare clones. Both techniques missed clinically important variants, posing challenges for clinical application. However, they identified similar founding clones and strong correlation of variant allele frequencies and clonal prevalences. ConclusionsAs both technologies can overlook variants, multiple technologies should be utilized to understand clonality in heterogeneous diseases such as AML. Careful scDNA-seq target panel planning, utilizing knowledge obtained from bulk sequencing, can offer more information on clonal heterogeneity. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=108 SRC="FIGDIR/small/656982v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (21K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e429b1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6d650forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5eb31org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@93e735_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

genomics↗