Biology subjects

Eickhoff, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Eickhoff, S..

15 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Widespread use of invalid statistical tests in biomedical machine learning

Cross-validation is routinely used to compare performance in biomedical artificial intelligence. Standard tests ignore correlation across cross-validation folds, inflating false-positive rates. In a PRISMA-guided meta-analysis of 184 studies (impact factor [≥] 15) across 30 biomedical fields, 97% use invalid tests. Among studies with abstract-level claims supported by invalid tests, 59% rely on a spurious comparison: one that loses significance after correcting for this correlation. On average, regaining significance requires a 43% larger effect. Extending these findings to the broader literature, we estimate that spurious comparisons occur in nearly two in three studies and support abstract-level claims in nearly one in three studies. Simulations confirm false-positive rates paradoxically approach 100% when cross-validation is repeated to improve stability. We introduce SHARP, a redesign of cross-validation, which best balances false-positive control and power among 13 benchmarked tests. These results reveal widespread fragility in biomedical artificial intelligence and offer a practical route to valid comparisons.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2026

Normative Deviations Reveal Task-Evoked and Clinical Network Reorganization

Understanding how cognitive demands and pathology reshape large-scale functional connectivity (FC) requires methods that are both multivariate and region-specific. Here we introduce One-class SVM-based Connectome Anomaly Recognition (OSCAR), a normative modelling framework that detects condition-related deviations in the multivariate connectivity profile of a brain region. OSCAR learns the distribution of region-to-whole-brain connectivity patterns given a reference state sample (e.g. resting-state data; RS) using a one-class support vector machine (OCSVM). The trained models are then applied to FC profiles from a target condition (e.g., task or patient group). The outlier proportions are used to quantify the difference between the reference and target condition. We validated OSCAR on three diverse tasks and a patient cohort with early psychosis. OSCAR consistently identified condition-sensitive regions in networks known to support conflict processing, object-location memory, lexical learning, and early psychosis, respectively, including thalamic and basal ganglia regions. Moreover, it detected additional well-established task- or disease-relevant parcels not captured by the comparison method permutation-based multivariate analysis of variance (perMANOVA). Regions flagged by OSCAR were at least as close, and often closer, to independent task-activation findings than those identified by perMANOVA. These results demonstrate that OSCAR provides an interpretable, region-centred normative modelling approach that is sensitive to subtle multivariate FC deviations, and offers a practical tool for mapping condition-specific reconfigurations of functional brain networks with high external validity, in both experimental and clinical settings.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Prior Information Shapes Perceptual Evidence Accumulation Dynamics Differentially in Psychosis

Humans rely on prior information to navigate sensory uncertainty: Such priors could shape the decision process before sensory evidence is gathered (origin model), or could amplify sensory evidence dynamically (gain model). Dysfunctionalities in the utilisation of priors may underlie hallucinatory percepts and delusional ideation in psychosis, yet their impact on decision-making across sensory modalities has remained unclear. Using a perceptual target-detection task across auditory and visual domains in laboratory and online samples, we applied hierarchical drift diffusion modelling to examine how prior probabilities shape evidence accumulation in clinical and non-clinical populations. We show that in healthy individuals, prior information enhances sensory gain and decision flexibility, as represented by drift criterion and rate, consistent with the gain model. In contrast, individuals with psychosis exhibit diminished sensory gain, relying instead on pre-evidence biases, consistent with the origin model. Notably, greater positive symptom severity predicted a reduction in traditional criterion decision bias. These results suggest that sensory gain deficits may serve as a computational marker for psychosis progression, linking dysfunctional prior use to perceptual aberrancies. By demonstrating how prior information modulates evidence accumulation across sensory modalities, our study advances the understanding of psychotic perception and decision-making, offering insights for computational psychiatry and fine-tuned clinical diagnostics.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Can we predict sleep health based on brain features? A large-scale machine learning study

BackgroundsSeveral correlational or group comparison evidence highlighted robust associations between sleep health and macro-scale brain organization. However, inter-individual variability is critical in such interplay. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the role of brain imaging features in predicting diverse sleep health-related characteristics at the individual subject level using the Machine Learning (ML) approach. MethodsA sample of 28,088 participants from the UK Biobank was employed to calculate 4677 structural and functional neuroimaging markers. Then, we employed them to predict self-reported insomnia symptoms, sleep duration, easiness of getting up in the morning, chronotype, daily nap, daytime sleepiness, and snoring. To assess the predictability of brain features, we built seven different linear and nonlinear ML models for each sleep health-related characteristic. ResultsWe performed extensive ML analyses that involved more than 19 years of compute time. We observed relatively low performance in predicting all sleep health-related characteristics from brain images (e.g., balanced accuracy ranging between 0.50-0.59). Across all models, the best performance achieved was 0.59, using a linear ML model to predict the ease of getting up in the morning. In fact, a similar performance was achieved with models trained solely on age and sex, indicating that these demographic factors might be the ones driving the predictions. ConclusionsThe low capability of multimodal neuroimaging markers in predicting sleep health-related characteristics, even under extensive ML optimization in a large population sample, suggests a complex relationship between sleep health and brain organization.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Test Retest Reliability of Meta Analytic Networks During Naturalistic Viewing

Functional connectivity analyses have given considerable insights into human brain function and organization. As research moves towards clinical application, test-retest reliability has become a main focus of the field. So far, the majority of studies have relied on resting-state paradigms to examine brain connectivity, based on its low demand and ease of implementation. However, the reliability of resting-state measures is mostly moderate, potentially due to its unconstrained nature. Recently, naturalistic viewing paradigms have gained popularity because they probe the human brain under more ecologically valid conditions, thereby possibly increasing reliability. Therefore, we here compared the reliability of graph metrics extracted from resting-state and naturalistic viewing in functional networks, across two sessions. We show that naturalistic viewing can increase reliability over resting-state, but that its effect varies between stimuli and networks. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the effect of naturalistic viewing differs between two cohorts with Asian and European cultural backgrounds. Taken together, our study encourages the use of naturalistic viewing to increase reliability, but emphasizes the need to carefully select the appropriate stimulus and network for the respective research question.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Relating sex differences in cortical and hippocampal microstructure to sex hormones

Sex hormone receptors are expressed widely in both neurons and glial cells, which allows them to interact with the brains major cell groups via several molecular mechanisms. These mechanisms lead to sex differences in brain structure as well as hormone-induced plasticity in the female brain across the menstrual cycle. Adding to the literature on volumetric changes in cortical structure, here we set out to investigate sex differences in the microstructure of the human cortex in relation to sex hormones. We assessed regional variation in cortical microstructure as a function of sex, hormonal status and sex hormone receptor gene expression distribution based on quantitative intracortical profiling in vivo using the magnetic resonance imaging based T1w/T2w ratio in 992 healthy females and males of the Human Connectome Project young adult sample. We demonstrate that microstructure in isocortex and hippocampus differs regionally between males and females, that this effect varies with hormone levels of females and that implicated brain regions overlap with estrogen receptor and sex steroid synthesis gene expression. Lastly, we show that sex and sex hormone related brain structure variations are most pronounced in areas of low laminar cortical complexity (agranular cortex), which are also predicted to be most plastic based on their cytoarchitectural properties. Together, our data thus are suggestive of sex differences in cortical and hippocampal microstructure, as well as the modulatory function of sex hormones on these measures. Albeit correlative, this study underscores the importance of incorporating sex hormone variables into the investigation of brain structure and plasticity.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Converging Topographic Axes of Connectivity and Genetic Architectures Scaffold Cortical Patterning

Genetic information is involved in the gradual emergence of cortical areas since the neural tube begins to form, shaping the heterogeneous functions of neural circuits in the human brain. Informed by invasive tract-tracing measurements, the cortex exhibits marked interareal variation in connectivity profiles to reveal the heterogeneity across cortical areas. However, it remains unclear about the organizing principles possibly shared by genetics and cortical wiring to manifest the spatial heterogeneity across the cortex. Instead of considering a complex one-to-one mapping between genetic coding and interareal connectivity, we hypothesized the existence of a more efficient way that the organizing principles are embedded in genetic profiles to underpin the cortical wiring space. Leveraging on the vertex-wise tractography in diffusion-weighted MRI, we derived the global connectopies to reliably index the organizing principles of interareal connectivity variation in a low-dimensional space, which specifically captured three dominant topographic patterns along the dorsoventral, rostrocaudal, and mediolateral axes of the cortex. More importantly, we demonstrated that the global connectopies converge to the gradients of vertex-by-vertex genetic correlation matrix on the phenotype of cortical morphology and the cortex-wide spatiomolecular gradients. By diving into the genetic profiles, we found the critical role of genes scaffolding the global connectopies were related to brain morphogenesis and enriched in radial glial cells before birth and excitatory neurons after birth. Taken together, our findings demonstrated the existence of a genetically determined space to encode the interareal connectivity variation, which may give new insights into the links between cortical connections and arealization.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Is resting state fMRI better than individual characteristics at predicting cognition?

Changes in spontaneous brain activity at rest provide rich information about behavior and cognition. The mathematical properties of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) are a depiction of brain function and are frequently used to predict cognitive phenotypes. Individual characteristics such as age, gender, and total intracranial volume (TIV) play an important role in predictive modeling of rsfMRI (for example, as "confounders" in many cases). It is unclear, however, to what extent rsfMRI carries independent information from the individual characteristics that is able to predict cognitive phenotypes. Here, we used predictive modeling to thoroughly examine the predictability of four cognitive phenotypes in 20,000 healthy UK Biobank subjects. We extracted common rsfMRI features of functional brain connectivity (FC) and temporal complexity (TC). We assessed the ability of these features to predict outcomes in the presence and absence of age, gender, and TIV. Additionally, we assessed the predictiveness of age, gender, and TIV only. We find TC and FC features to perform comparably with regard to predicting cognitive phenotypes. As compared to rsfMRI features, individual characteristics provide systematically better predictions with smaller sample sizes and, to some extent, in larger cohorts. It is also consistent across different levels of inherent temporal noise in rsfMRI. Our results suggest that when the objective is to perform cognitive predictions as opposed to understanding the relationship between brain and behavior, individual characteristics are more applicable than rsfMRI features.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Comparison Between Gradients and Parcellations for Functional Connectivity Prediction of Behavior

Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) is widely used to predict behavioral measures. To predict behavioral measures, representing RSFC with parcellations and gradients are the two most popular approaches. Here, we compare parcellation and gradient approaches for RSFC-based prediction of a broad range of behavioral measures in the Human Connectome Project (HCP) and Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) datasets. Among the parcellation approaches, we consider group-average "hard" parcellations (Schaefer et al., 2018), individual-specific "hard" parcellations (Kong et al., 2021a), and an individual-specific "soft" parcellation (spatial independent component analysis with dual regression; Beckmann et al., 2009). For gradient approaches, we consider the well-known principal gradients (Margulies et al., 2016) and the local gradient approach that detects local RSFC changes (Laumann et al., 2015). Across two regression algorithms, individual-specific hard-parcellation performs the best in the HCP dataset, while the principal gradients, spatial independent component analysis and group-average "hard" parcellations exhibit similar performance. On the other hand, principal gradients and all parcellation approaches perform similarly in the ABCD dataset. Across both datasets, local gradients perform the worst. Finally, we find that the principal gradient approach requires at least 40 to 60 gradients to perform as well as parcellation approaches. While most principal gradient studies utilize a single gradient, our results suggest that incorporating higher order gradients can provide significant behaviorally relevant information. Future work will consider the inclusion of additional parcellation and gradient approaches for comparison.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

'Wanting' versus 'Needing' related value: an fMRI meta-analysis

Consumption and its excesses are sometimes explained by imbalance of need or lack of control over wanting. Wanting assigns value to cues that predict rewards, whereas needing assigns value to biologically significant stimuli that one is deprived of. Here we aimed at studying how the brain activation patterns related to value of wanted stimuli differs from that of needed stimuli using ALE neuroimaging meta-analysis approaches. We used the perception of a cue predicting a reward for wanting related value and the perception of food stimuli in a hungry state as a model for needing related value. We carried out separate, contrasts, and conjunction meta-analyses to identify differences and similarities between wanting and needing values. Our overall results for wanting related value show consistent activation of the ventral tegmental area, striatum and pallidum, regions that both activate behaviour and direct choice; while for needing related value we found an overall consistent activation of the middle insula and to some extent the caudal-ventral putamen, regions that only direct choice. Our study suggests that wanting has more control on consumption, and a needed stimuli must become wanted in order to be pursued.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Individual-Specific Areal-Level Parcellations Improve Functional Connectivity Prediction of Behavior

Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) allows estimation of individual-specific cortical parcellations. We have previously developed a multi-session hierarchical Bayesian model (MS-HBM) for estimating high-quality individual-specific network-level parcellations. Here, we extend the model to estimate individual-specific areal-level parcellations. While network-level parcellations comprise spatially distributed networks spanning the cortex, the consensus is that areal-level parcels should be spatially localized, i.e., should not span multiple lobes. There is disagreement about whether areal-level parcels should be strictly contiguous or comprise multiple non-contiguous components, therefore we considered three areal-level MS-HBM variants spanning these range of possibilities. Individual-specific MS-HBM parcellations estimated using 10min of data generalized better than other approaches using 150min of data to out-of-sample rs-fMRI and task-fMRI from the same individuals. Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) derived from MS-HBM parcellations also achieved the best behavioral prediction performance. Among the three MS-HBM variants, the strictly contiguous MS-HBM (cMS-HBM) exhibited the best resting-state homogeneity and most uniform within-parcel task activation. In terms of behavioral prediction, the gradient-infused MS-HBM (gMS-HBM) was numerically the best, but differences among MS-HBM variants were not statistically significant. Overall, these results suggest that areal-level MS-HBMs can capture behaviorally meaningful individual-specific parcellation features beyond group-level parcellations. Multi-resolution trained models and parcellations are publicly available (https://github.com/ThomasYeoLab/CBIG/tree/master/stable_projects/brain_parcellation/Kong2022_ArealMSHBM).

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Shared and unique brain network features predict cognition, personality and mental health in childhood

The manner through which individual differences in brain network organization track population-level behavioral variability is a fundamental question in systems neuroscience. Recent work suggests that resting-state and task-state functional connectivity can predict specific traits at the individual level. However, the focus of most studies on single behavioral traits has come at the expense of capturing broader relationships across behaviors. Here, we utilized a large-scale dataset of 1858 typically developing children to estimate whole-brain functional network organization that is predictive of individual differences in cognition, impulsivity-related personality, and mental health during rest and task states. Predictive network features were distinct across the broad behavioral domains: cognition, personality and mental health. On the other hand, traits within each behavioral domain were predicted by highly similar network features. This is surprising given decades of research emphasizing that distinct brain networks support different mental processes. Although tasks are known to modulate the functional connectome, we found that predictive network features were similar between resting and task states. Overall, our findings reveal shared brain network features that account for individual variation within broad domains of behavior in childhood, yet are unique to different behavioral domains.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Convergent neural representations of acute nociceptive pain in healthy volunteers: A large-scale fMRI meta-analysis

Characterizing a reliable, pain-related neural signature is critical for translational applications. Many prior fMRI studies have examined acute pain-related brain activation in healthy participants. However, synthesizing these data to identify convergent patterns of activation can be challenging due to the heterogeneity of experimental designs and samples. To address this challenge, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of fMRI studies of stimulus-induced pain in healthy participants. Following pre-registration, two independent reviewers evaluated 4,927 abstracts returned from a search of 8 databases, with 222 fMRI experiments meeting inclusion criteria. We analyzed these experiments using Activation Likelihood Estimation with rigorous type I error control (voxel height p < 0.001, cluster p < 0.05 FWE-corrected) and found a convergent, largely bilateral pattern of pain-related activation in the secondary somatosensory cortex, insula, midcingulate cortex, and thalamus. Notably, these regions were consistently recruited regardless of stimulation technique, location of induction, and participant sex. These findings suggest a highly-conserved core set of pain-related brain areas, encouraging applications as a biomarker for novel therapeutics targeting acute pain.\n\nHIGHLIGHTSO_LIPain stimulation recruits a core set of pain-related brain regions.\nC_LIO_LIThis core set includes thalamus, SII, insula and mid-cingulate cortex.\nC_LIO_LIThese regions were recruited regardless of stimulus modality and stimulus location.\nC_LI

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC CORRELATION BETWEEN SLEEP, BEHAVIOR, AND MACROSCALE CORTICAL GREY MATTER

Humans need about 7 to 9 hours of sleep per night. Sleep habits are heritable, associated with brain function and structure, and intrinsically related to well-being, mental and physical health. This raises the question whether associations between sleep, mental and physical health can be attributed to a shared macroscale neurobiology.\n\nCombining neuroimaging and behavioral genetic approaches in two independent large-scale datasets (n=1887) we demonstrate phenotypic and genetic correspondence between sleep, intelligence, and BMI. Sleep was associated with local thickness variation in frontal, temporal, and occipital cortices. Using a comprehensive multivariate approach, we identified two robust latent components highlighting the interdigitation of sleep, intelligence, BMI, and depression and their shared relation to regions in unimodal and heteromodal association cortices. Latent relationships were heritable and driven by shared additive genetic factors. These observations provide a system-level perspective on the interrelation of sleep, mental, and physical conditions, anchored in grey-matter neuroanatomy.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Empirical examination of the replicability of associations between brain structure and psychological variables

Linking interindividual differences in psychological phenotype to variations in brain structure is an old dream for psychology and a crucial question for cognitive neurosciences. Yet, replicability of the previously-reported \"structural brain behavior\" (SBB)-associations has been questioned, recently. Here, we conducted an empirical investigation, assessing replicability of SBB among heathy adults. For a wide range of psychological measures, the replicability of associations with gray matter volume was assessed. Our results revealed that among healthy individuals 1) finding an association between performance at standard psychological tests and brain morphology is relatively unlikely 2) significant associations, found using an exploratory approach, have overestimated effect sizes and 3) can hardly be replicated in an independent sample. After considering factors such as sample size and comparing our findings with more replicable SBB-associations in a clinical cohort and replicable associations between brain structure and non-psychological phenotype, we discuss the potential causes and consequences of these findings.

neuroscience↗