Biology subjects

Egger, S. W.

Publications and source records attributed to Egger, S. W..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Context-dependence of deterministic and nondeterministic contributions to closed-loop steering control

In natural circumstances, sensory systems operate in a closed loop with motor output, whereby actions shape subsequent sensory experiences. A prime example of this is the sensorimotor processing required to align ones direction of travel, or heading, with ones goal, a behavior we refer to as steering. In steering, motor outputs work to eliminate errors between the direction of heading and the goal, modifying subsequent errors in the process. The closed-loop nature of the behavior makes it challenging to determine how deterministic and nondeterministic processes contribute to behavior. We overcome this by applying a nonparametric, linear kernel-based analysis to behavioral data of monkeys steering through a virtual environment in two experimental contexts. In a given context, the results were consistent with previous work that described the transformation as a second-order linear system. Classically, the parameters of such second-order models are associated with physical properties of the limb such as viscosity and stiffness that are commonly assumed to be approximately constant. By contrast, we found that the fit kernels differed strongly across tasks in these and other parameters, suggesting context-dependent changes in neural and biomechanical processes. We additionally fit residuals to a simple noise model and found that the form of the noise was highly conserved across both contexts and animals. Strikingly, the fitted noise also closely matched that found previously in a human steering task. Altogether, this work presents a kernel-based analysis that characterizes the context-dependence of deterministic and non-deterministic components of a closed-loop sensorimotor task. New and noteworthyWe use nonparametric systems identification techniques to assess the context-dependence of deterministic and nondeterministic contributions to a closed-loop behavior. Classical approaches assume a fixed transformation between sensory input and motor output. Here, we reveal strong changes to the measured sensorimotor transformations with behavioral context. In contrast, noise within the transformation exhibited a consistent form across contexts, subjects, and species. Together, this work demonstrates how context affects the systematic and stochastic components of a closed-loop behavior.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

The predictive power of intrinsic timescale during the perceptual decision-making process across the mouse brain

Across the cortical hierarchy, single neurons are characterized by differences in the extent to which they can sustain their firing rate over time (i.e., their "intrinsic timescale"). Previous studies have demonstrated that neurons in a given brain region mostly exhibit either short or long intrinsic timescales. In this study, we sought to identify populations of neurons that accumulate information over different timescales in the mouse brain and to characterize their functions in the context of a visual discrimination task. Thus, we separately examined the neural population dynamics of neurons with long or short intrinsic timescales across different brain regions. More specifically, we looked at the decoding performance of these neural populations aligned to different task variables (stimulus onset, movement). Taken together, our population-level findings support the hypothesis that long intrinsic timescale neurons encode abstract variables related to decision formation. Furthermore, we investigated whether there was a relationship between how well a single neuron represents the animals choice or stimuli and their intrinsic timescale. We did not observe any significant relationship between the decoding of these task variables and a single neurons intrinsic timescale. In summary, our findings support the idea that the long intrinsic timescale population of neurons, which appear at different levels of the cortical hierarchy, are primarily more involved in representing the decision variable.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Neural structure of a sensory decoder for motor control

We seek to understand the neural mechanisms that perform sensory decoding for motor behavior, advancing the field by designing decoders based on neural circuits. A simple experiment produced a surprising result that shapes our approach. Changing the size of a target for smooth pursuit eye movements changes the relationship between the variance and mean of the evoked behavior in a way that contradicts the regime of "signal-dependent noise" and defies traditional decoding approaches. A theoretical analysis leads us to conclude that sensory decoding circuits for pursuit include multiple parallel pathways and multiple sources of variation. Behavioral and neural responses with biomimetic statistics emerge from a biologically-motivated circuit model with noise in the pathway that is dedicated to flexibly adjusting the strength of visual-motor transmission. Flexible adjustment of transmission strength applies much more broadly to issues in sensory-motor control such as Bayesian integration and control strategies to optimize motor behavior.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

A neural circuit model for human sensorimotor timing

Humans can rapidly and flexibly coordinate their movements with external stimuli. Theoretical considerations suggest that this flexibility can be understood in terms of how sensory responses reconfigure the neural circuits that control movements. However, because external stimuli can occur at unexpected times, it is unclear how the corresponding sensory inputs can be used to exert flexible control over the ongoing activity of recurrent neural circuits. Here, we tackle this problem in the domain of sensorimotor timing and develop a circuit-level model that provides insight into how the brain coordinates movement times with expected and unexpected temporal events. The model consists of two interacting modules, a motor planning module that controls movement times and a sensory anticipation module that anticipates external events. Both modules harbor a reservoir of latent dynamics and their interaction forms a control system whose output is adjusted adaptively to minimize timing errors. We show that the models output matches human behavior in a range of tasks including time interval production, periodic production, synchronization/continuation, and Bayesian time interval reproduction. These results demonstrate how recurrent interactions in a simple and modular neural circuit could create the dynamics needed to control temporal aspects of behavior.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

A nonlinear updating algorithm captures suboptimal inference in the presence of signal-dependent noise

Bayesian models of behavior have advanced the idea that humans combine prior beliefs and sensory observations to minimize uncertainty. How the brain implements Bayes-optimal inference, however, remains poorly understood. Simple behavioral tasks suggest that the brain can flexibly represent and manipulate probability distributions. An alternative view is that brain relies on simple algorithms that can implement Bayes-optimal behavior only when the computational demands are low. To distinguish between these alternatives, we devised a task in which Bayes-optimal performance could not be matched by simple algorithms. We asked subjects to estimate and reproduce a time interval by combining prior information with one or two sequential measurements. In the domain of time, measurement noise increases with duration. This property makes the integration of multiple measurements beyond the reach of simple algorithms. We found that subjects were able to update their estimates using the second measurement but their performance was suboptimal, suggesting that they were unable to update full probability distributions. Instead, subjects behavior was consistent with an algorithm that predicts upcoming sensory signals, and applies a nonlinear function to errors in prediction to update estimates. These results indicate that inference strategies humans deploy may deviate from Bayes-optimal integration when the computational demands are high.

neuroscience↗