Biology subjects

Eeles, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Eeles, C..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Detection of circular RNAs and their potential as biomarkers predictive of drug response

The introduction of high-throughput sequencing technologies has allowed for comprehensive RNA species detection, both coding and non-coding, which opened new avenues for the discovery of predictive and prognostic biomarkers. However the consistency of the detection of different RNA species depends on the RNA selection protocol used for RNA-sequencing. While preliminary reports indicated that non-coding RNAs, in particular circular RNAs, constitute a rich source of biomarkers predictive of drug response, the reproducibility of this novel class of biomarkers has not been rigorously investigated. To address this issue, we assessed the inter- lab consistency of circular RNA expression in cell lines profiled in large pharmacogenomic datasets. We found that circular RNA expression quantified from rRNA-depleted RNA-seq data is stable and yields robust prognostic markers in cancer. On the other hand, quantification of the expression of circular RNA from poly(A)-selected RNA-seq data yields highly inconsistent results, calling into question results from previous studies reporting their potential as predictive biomarkers in cancer. We have also identified median expression of transcripts and transcript length as potential factors influencing the consistency of RNA detection. Our study provides a framework to quantitatively assess the stability of coding and non-coding RNA expression through the analysis of biological replicates within and across independent studies.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

PharmacoDB 2.0 : Improving scalability and transparency of in vitro pharmacogenomics analysis

Cancer pharmacogenomics studies provide valuable insights into disease progression and associations between genomic features and drug response. PharmacoDB integrates multiple cancer pharmacogenomics datasets profiling approved and investigational drugs across cell lines from diverse tissue types. The web-application enables users to efficiently navigate across datasets, view and compare drug dose-response data for a specific drug-cell line pair. In the new version of PharmacoDB (version 2.0, https://pharmacodb.ca/), we present: (i) new datasets such as NCI-60, the Profiling Relative Inhibition Simultaneously in Mixtures (PRISM) dataset, as well as updated data from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) and the Genentech Cell Line Screening Initiative (gCSI); (ii) implementation of FAIR data pipelines using ORCESTRA and PharmacoDI; (iii) enhancements to drug response analysis such as tissue distribution of dose-response metrics and biomarker analysis; (iv) improved connectivity to drug and cell line databases in the community. The web interface has been rewritten using a modern technology stack to ensure scalability and standardization to accommodate growing pharmacogenomics datasets. PharmacoDB 2.0 is a valuable tool for mining pharmacogenomics datasets, comparing and assessing drug response phenotypes of cancer models. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIPharmacoDB 2.0 includes new and updated large pharmacogenomic datasets. The data processing for PharmacoDB is made fully reproducible through the use of the ORCESTRA platform and automated data ingestion pipelines C_LIO_LIThe new release contains enriched annotations for drugs and cell lines via connectivity to external databases, as well as new analytical methods for tissue-specific and pan-cancer biomarker discovery C_LIO_LIThe new version of PharmacoDB incorporates a scalable and reproducible framework that can accelerate the implementation of analytical pipelines including machine learning/AI for biomarker discovery in the future C_LI

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2020

KuLGaP: A Selective Measure for Assessing Therapy Response in Patient-Derived Xenografts

Quantifying response to drug treatment in mouse models of human cancer is important for treatment development and assignment, and yet remains a challenging task. A preferred measure to quantify this response should take into account as much of the experimental data as possible, i.e. both tumor size over time and the variation among replicates. We propose a theoretically grounded measure, KuLGaP, to compute the difference between the treatment and control arms. KuLGaP is more selective than currently existing measures, reduces the risk of false positive calls and improves translation of the lab results to clinical practice.

bioinformatics↗